Is QQQ or VUG the Better Growth ETF? Here's What Investors Need to Know.

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • QQQ carries a higher expense ratio than VUG and has delivered a slightly stronger 5-year total return.

  • Both ETFs are extremely liquid, with QQQ showing a somewhat lower volatility profile and similar tech-heavy sector allocations.

  • QQQ has a longer track record than VUG, but both funds are well-established.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

The Vanguard Growth ETF (NYSEMKT:VUG) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (NASDAQ:QQQ) both target U.S. large-cap growth stocks, but QQQ is more expensive and concentrated, while VUG offers broader diversification at a lower fee.

Both funds are popular choices for large-cap growth exposure, with VUG tracking the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index and QQQ mirroring the NASDAQ-100 Index. Each leans heavily into technology and consumer-facing giants, but their differences in cost, holdings count, and performance may appeal to different types of investors.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVUGQQQ
IssuerVanguardInvesco
Expense ratio0.04%0.20%
1-yr return (as of Dec. 12, 2025)14.4%16.6%
Dividend yield0.42%0.46%
Beta (5Y monthly)1.231.19
AUM$353 billion$403 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

VUG is markedly more affordable with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared to QQQ’s 0.20% fee. QQQ offers a slightly higher dividend yield at 0.46%, but the difference is minimal and unlikely to drive most decisions between these two funds.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVUGQQQ
Max drawdown (5 y)-35.61%-35.12%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,984$2,033

What's inside

QQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index, holding 101 stocks with a sector allocation of 55% technology, 17% communication services, and 13% consumer cyclical, as of December 2025.

Its top holdings are Nvidia, making up 9.09% of the fund's total assets, Apple at 8.75%, and Microsoft at 7.73%. The fund has a long operating history of nearly 27 years, making it one of the most established growth ETFs on the market.

VUG, by contrast, splits its portfolio across 160 stocks, with a similar sector tilt: 53% technology, 14% communication services, and 14% consumer cyclical. Its largest positions mirror QQQ's, but the holdings make up a slightly larger portion of the fund's total assets. Launched in 2004, it has a long track record but not quite as extensive as QQQ.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

QQQ and VUG are similar in many ways. They're both popular and established large-cap growth ETFs with a tilt toward technology, and they contain the same top holdings. While QQQ has a slight edge with its one- and five-year total returns, the difference is minimal.

There are two main factors differentiating these two ETFs: fees and diversification.

QQQ has a much higher expense ratio, at 0.20% compared to VUG's 0.04%. In other words, investors can expect to pay either $20 or $4, respectively, per year in fees for every $10,000 invested.

That may seem insignificant, but it can potentially add up to thousands of dollars for long-term investors and those with large account balances.

Also, VUG contains nearly 60 more stocks than QQQ, and that increased diversification can be both an asset and a risk. A greater number of stocks can sometimes help reduce volatility during periods of instability; however, there's also a greater chance that lower-performing stocks will drag down the fund's total returns.

Over the last five years, the two ETFs have seen roughly the same earnings. Where you choose to buy, then, will depend mostly on how much diversification you're seeking as well as how much you're willing to pay in fees.

Glossary

ETF: Exchange-traded fund; a basket of securities traded on an exchange like a stock.
Expense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges its investors.
Dividend yield: The annual dividends paid by a fund divided by its share price, shown as a percentage.
Beta: A measure of an investment's volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
AUM: Assets under management; the total market value of assets a fund manages on behalf of investors.
Max drawdown: The largest percentage drop from a fund's peak value to its lowest point over a specific period.
Sector allocation: The distribution of a fund's investments across different industry sectors.
Index tracking: When a fund aims to replicate the performance of a specific market index.
Large-cap: Refers to companies with large market capitalizations, typically over $10 billion.
Total return: The investment's price change plus all dividends and distributions, assuming those payouts are reinvested.
Concentration: The degree to which a fund's assets are invested in a small number of holdings.
Growth stocks: Shares in companies expected to grow earnings faster than the market average.

Where to invest $1,000 right now

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 972%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 195% for the S&P 500.

They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of December 8, 2025

Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Macro Analysts: Hawkish Japan Could Push Bitcoin Below $70KAnalysts predict Bitcoin may face further declines towards the $70,000 mark if the Bank of Japan raises interest rates as expected.
Author  Mitrade
13 hours ago
Analysts predict Bitcoin may face further declines towards the $70,000 mark if the Bank of Japan raises interest rates as expected.
placeholder
Ethereum Price Slips Lower — $3,000 Looms as the Key BattlegroundEthereum is attempting to recover from a $3,026 low but remains below $3,200 and the 100-hour SMA, with a bearish trend line near $3,175 capping rebounds as bulls need a clean break above $3,200 to target $3,250–$3,400, while a drop below $3,050 risks a retest of $3,000 and $2,940.
Author  Mitrade
16 hours ago
Ethereum is attempting to recover from a $3,026 low but remains below $3,200 and the 100-hour SMA, with a bearish trend line near $3,175 capping rebounds as bulls need a clean break above $3,200 to target $3,250–$3,400, while a drop below $3,050 risks a retest of $3,000 and $2,940.
placeholder
Gold remains bid as lack of Fed clarity and geopolitical frictions persistGold (XAU/USD) advances modestly on Friday as traders seem to book profits ahead of the weekend, yet clings to gains of over 0.51% after reaching a seven-week high of $4,353. At the time of writing, XAU/USD trades at $4,302 as traders digest comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) officials.
Author  FXStreet
17 hours ago
Gold (XAU/USD) advances modestly on Friday as traders seem to book profits ahead of the weekend, yet clings to gains of over 0.51% after reaching a seven-week high of $4,353. At the time of writing, XAU/USD trades at $4,302 as traders digest comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) officials.
placeholder
Wall Street Sounds Alarm: "Bitcoin's Four-Year Cycle Invalidated" - Will the Crypto Bull Market Persist?Wall Street Challenges Bitcoin's CyclicalityTradingKey - Recently, Wall Street firms led byJPMorgan, Bernstein, and ARK Invest ignited debate, asserting Bitcoin's four-year cycle is broken. They claim
Author  TradingKey
Dec 12, Fri
Wall Street Challenges Bitcoin's CyclicalityTradingKey - Recently, Wall Street firms led byJPMorgan, Bernstein, and ARK Invest ignited debate, asserting Bitcoin's four-year cycle is broken. They claim
placeholder
Ethereum Price Eyes an Upside Break — But $3,350 Has Other IdeasEthereum is consolidating above $3,200 and its 100-hour SMA after defending $3,150, with a bullish trend line support at $3,180 and an upside breakout hinging on a clean move through $3,320–$3,350, while a drop below $3,150 would reopen $3,040–$3,000 support.
Author  Mitrade
Dec 12, Fri
Ethereum is consolidating above $3,200 and its 100-hour SMA after defending $3,150, with a bullish trend line support at $3,180 and an upside breakout hinging on a clean move through $3,320–$3,350, while a drop below $3,150 would reopen $3,040–$3,000 support.
goTop
quote