PG&E (PCG) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Thursday, October 23, 2025 at 11 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

Chief Executive Officer — Patricia Kessler Poppe

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — Carolyn J. Burke

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

TAKEAWAYS

Core EPS -- $0.50 for the third quarter and Core EPS of $1.14 for the first nine months of 2025, with the narrowed 2025 full-year non-GAAP core EPS guidance at $1.49 to $1.51.

2026 EPS Guidance -- Projected non-GAAP core EPS of $1.62 to $1.66 for 2026, representing a 9% midpoint increase over the 2025 midpoint guidance.

Long-Term EPS Growth Target -- Management set a target of at least 9% annual core EPS growth from 2026 through 2030.

Five-Year Capital Plan -- $73 billion capital plan through 2030, Supporting an average annual rate base growth of 9% from 2026 through 2030 and not requiring new equity issuance.

Wildfire Metrics -- Year-to-date CPUC reportable ignitions down over 35% from 2024 as of October 20, 2025, marking the lowest level since records began in 2015.

Undergrounding Progress -- 1,000 miles of power lines constructed and energized underground in the highest fire risk areas as of October 2025, at a 25% lower cost than initial projects.

O&M Savings -- 5¢ EPS contribution in the third quarter, 8¢ year-to-date for the first nine months, with the company on track to meet or exceed its 2% nonfuel O&M reduction target for 2025.

Tax Planning Benefit -- Accelerated deductibility methods provided an additional non-GAAP core EPS tailwind in both Q3 and the first nine months of 2025, considered upside for customer benefit and future years' protection.

Dividend Policy -- Targeting a 20% dividend payout ratio by 2028 and maintaining that level through 2030.

Fitch Credit Rating -- Parent company rating returned to investment grade, with a continued focus on maintaining FFO to debt in the mid-teens.

Data Center Pipeline -- Over 9.5 GW data center pipeline as of the third quarter of 2025, with modest attrition in earlier project phases but growth in final engineering now at 1.6 GW, of which approximately 95% is expected online by 2030.

Customer Rate Outlook -- Supported by ongoing expense reductions and anticipated load growth.

Advanced Grid Technologies -- Deployment of 8,500 new sensor devices in 2025, building on 10,000 installed in 2024, along with rollout of AI-enabled continuous monitoring and advanced grid-edge meters.

Financing Plan -- Long-term plan through 2030 built not to require new common equity, emphasizing flexibility and credit metrics supportive of investment-grade ratings.

SUMMARY

PG&E Corporation (NYSE:PCG) provided a narrowed 2025 earnings outlook and initiated upward guidance for 2026 EPS, reinforcing confidence in its long-term growth trajectory. The company highlighted tangible wildfire mitigation progress, record-setting ignition reductions year-to-date through October 20, 2025, and major advances in undergrounding while explicitly quantifying cost and performance improvements. Strategic plans through 2030 leverage substantial capital investments—without new equity needs—as management pursues comprehensive risk management and enhances customer affordability, with the plan explicitly built not to require new common equity through 2030. New regulatory, legislative, and credit rating milestones were described as ongoing tailwinds, with direct implications for future capital allocation and investor return frameworks. Leadership prioritized further technology deployment for grid reliability and outlined specific pipeline metrics supporting incremental growth from data center customers.

CEO Poppe said, "We're feeling the positive momentum of this process," in reference to wildfire fund policy and legislation.

CFO Burke stated, "This continues to be a no big bets plan," describing the capital investment approach that emphasizes incremental projects.

PG&E achieved a milestone of zero structures destroyed due to CPUC reportable fires in high-risk areas under high-risk conditions for a third consecutive year, according to Patricia Kessler Poppe.

Management reported achieving nonfuel O&M savings above target for three consecutive years and indicated confidence in maintaining this trend.

PG&E's capital plan forecasts for 2026 through 2030 exclude $2.9 billion of CapEx to be securitized under SB 254, clarifying the rate base forecast methodology.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

CPUC reportable ignition: An incident involving utility equipment that meets California Public Utilities Commission criteria for mandatory reporting due to fire risk.

GRC (General Rate Case): The regulatory proceeding in which a utility requests approval from the CPUC for revenue requirements and rates over a multi-year period.

SB 254: 2025 California legislation strengthening the Wildfire Fund structure and utility risk mitigation obligations.

O&M (Operations & Maintenance): Nonfuel operating expenses related to system maintenance and operations.

FFO to debt: The ratio of funds from operations to total debt, a credit metric used by rating agencies for financial strength assessment.

FERC formula rate: A transmission rate-setting process governed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission allowing cost recovery under a fixed methodology.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Thank you, Jonathan. Good morning, everyone. Our core earnings per share are $0.50 for the third quarter and $1.14 for the first nine months of 2025. Today, we're narrowing our full-year guidance range. We've previously shared a range of $1.48 to $1.52. The new range is $1.49 to $1.51, and we're keeping our bias toward the midpoint, which is up 10% over 2024. We're also introducing our 2026 EPS guidance range of $1.62 to $1.66. At the midpoint, this is up 9% from our 2025 midpoint. Last month, on our investor update call, we extended our five-year capital plan through 2030.

Highlights included at least 9% EPS growth each year from 2026 to 2030, a five-year capital plan of $73 billion through 2030, which supports average annual rate base growth of 9%, and a financing plan which does not require new equity also through 2030. With the 2025 California legislative session over and the enhanced protections of Senate Bill 254 in place, our team is focused on collaborating with key parties, advisers, and state agencies as the wildfire fund administrator prepares their April 1 report and recommendations for how best to socialize and mitigate climate-driven wildfire risk in the state.

This report is expected to lay out a wide range of policy options that will inform potential legislative action to stabilize the utility sector in the 2026 session. We're feeling the positive momentum of this process. With what Governor Newsom on issuing his recent executive order call a whole of government response to protect Californians from wildfire. We share the governor's sense of scale and urgency and are committed to supporting the state's efforts to meaningfully adapt California's policy construct to meet the moment. As this work continues, we know that there's no better protection for our customers and our investors than predicting and preventing catastrophic fires in the first place.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co.'s physical layers of protection are delivering. Through October 20, our total year-to-date CPUC reportable ignitions are down over 35% from 2024 levels and are running lower than any year since we started tracking these data in 2015. Despite this year having seen the second largest number of fires greater than 10 acres statewide since 2017, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. is on track for a third consecutive year of zero structures destroyed due to CPUC reportable fires in high-risk areas under high-risk conditions. We're proud of that. In spite of continued elevated climate-related risk, Pacific Gas & Electric Co.'s layers of protection from ignition prevention to hazard awareness and response are proving effective.

Contributing to this performance, we can point to several ongoing and new mitigations. About a month ago, we marked a significant milestone for our customers, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. has now constructed and energized 1,000 miles of power lines underground in the highest fire risk areas. As we've consistently said, undergrounding remains the most affordable and effective way of delivering the safety and resilience our customers deserve. Customers should not have to choose between safety and having reliable electricity. Undergrounding is the only mitigation that delivers both.

This year, we cleared vegetation in a 50-foot radius at the base of nearly 4,000 transmission structures after our data showed this approach would have contained the majority of transmission-related ignitions that we have experienced over the last three years. And we're continuing to deploy advanced sensor capabilities, including installing another 8,500 sensor devices this year, which builds on the 10,000 we rolled out last year. These low-cost sensors, coupled with our existing smart meters and our newly deployed AI-enabled machine learning model, are enabling secondary system-wide continuous monitoring. This capability allows us to detect potential faults on the system before they occur, including on the customer side of the distribution pool.

We will continue to leverage data to drive our mitigations in the field, making the system and our customers safer each and every day. In addition to executing on this important safety work, my coworkers have been leveraging our performance playbook to deliver consistent outcomes across the business for customers and investors. You can see our simple affordable model is working. Our five-year plan contemplates $73 billion of customer beneficial capital investment through 2030. At the same time, building on lowered electric rates this year and planned even lower rates for bundled electric customers in 2026, we expect customer bills in 2027 to be flat to down to where they are this year.

We are doing this by eliminating waste and delivering on our 2% O&M cost reduction goal, enabling rate-reducing load growth by partnering with our large load customers, and executing on a financial plan built with flexibility, conservatism, and credit metric targets supportive of investment-grade ratings, which will lead to interest expense savings for customers. We know that performance is power. When we perform, we will have the power to influence perceptions and outcomes. By putting customers at the heart of everything we do, and by doing what we say, our brand trust is on the rise and has been since our 2027 GRC filing started to change the narrative on affordability.

In fact, when compared to our US utility peers, the second quarter 2025 residential customer engagement study by Escalant showed we had the highest annual increase in brand trust. Our data center pipeline remains robust at over 9.5 gigawatts. We've seen modest net attrition in our application and preliminary engineering phase since June. However, our projects in the final engineering stage continue to grow and advance. Most of the applications in our pipeline are for 100 megawatts or less.

This is a function of existing California regulation but also a sign that data centers designed to support AI inference models have strong and compelling reasons to want to locate in Pacific Gas & Electric Co.'s service area, which includes Silicon Valley, the home of the technology sector. Data centers of this size can be in densely populated areas, close to the end user, and benefit from Northern California's extensive existing fiber network. This makes our service area a prime location for these customers who require real-time speed to ensure an optimal user experience. We're laser-focused on making this a win-win-win for our cities, our customers, and data center developers.

For example, we partnered with the city of San Jose to identify more than 150 acres of land adjacent to our existing infrastructure and in the heart of Silicon Valley that will be power-ready for the data center selected from the city's competitive RFP issued earlier this year. Our robust pipeline with a diverse set of projects is a great opportunity for customer affordability and California's economic prosperity. Every gigawatt we bring online offers the opportunity to reduce electric bills by 1% to 2%. I'll remind you that this is upside to our plan, both in terms of customer affordability and in terms of capital growth.

Given our bias for conservative planning, our capital plan only includes about $300 million a year for this type of capital, much of which falls under our FERC formula rate. With that, I'll hand it over to Carolyn to discuss our financials.

Carolyn J. Burke: Thank you, Patty, and good morning, everyone. Here on slide eight, we're showing you our earnings walk for the first nine months of 2025. Core earnings per share are $1.14, and we're on track to deliver on our 2025 non-GAAP core EPS guidance narrowed today. As you can see, we've made additional progress towards our O&M cost savings goal, contributing 5¢ for the quarter and 8¢ year to date. We continue to see unit cost reductions in our inspection processes and savings through vendor contract renegotiations as two examples of our cost savings initiative. Another key driver is timing and other. This bucket is contributing 10¢ for the quarter and 4¢ year to date.

Both the third quarter and nine months include benefits from smart tax planning. As a result of a method change, we're able to accelerate the deductibility of certain work and recognize greater tax savings. We view this tailwind as upside available to redeploy for the benefit of our customers in addition to protecting future years. Turning to slide nine, there's no change to the extended five-year capital plan which we shared with you last month. Our planned customer beneficial investments support average annual rate base growth of approximately 9% from 2026 through 2030. Our rate base growth in turn supports annual core EPS growth of at least 9%, also through 2030.

As a reminder, our rate base forecast excludes the $2.9 billion of CapEx to be securitized under SB 254. Incrementally today, we're sharing more detail on our capital investment plan, as shown here on slide 10. This continues to be a no big bets plan. It includes many important projects over the course of the five years to improve safety, reliability, and resiliency for our customers while enabling economic growth through capacity upgrades and new business connections. To give you some examples, our plan includes a recently approved upgrade of our Helms hydro facility, enabling at least a 150 megawatt increase in generating capacity.

It also includes a substation upgrade, more than doubles electric capacity and improves reliability north of Sacramento. And it includes deployment of about 300,000 grid edge meters by 2030. These meters have distributed intelligence apps and advanced data processing which support customer electrification as well as wildfire risk reduction. Last month, I shared with you our financing guidepost, shown here again on slide 11. Importantly, our plan is built not to require a new common equity through 2030. A key consideration given where we currently trade. I also emphasize that we are continuing to prioritize investment-grade ratings, including maintaining FFO to debt in the mid-teens. Again, IG is one of the most meaningful potential affordability enablers for our customers.

I'll remind you that we're targeting a dividend payout ratio of 20% by 2028 and maintaining that level through 2030. This offers financing flexibility over the course of our plan as well as implying near-term compound DPS growth well in excess of 50% over the next three years. ARC planning also contemplates the possibility that the wild fund administrator calls for the contingent contributions authorized by SB 254. Regarding capital allocation, I'll remind you what both Patty and I shared on our September update call.

Based on progress in the 2025 legislative session and encouraging signals that the state is serious about pursuing further reform in phase two, we see the investment plan we have shared with you as best delivering for our customers and investors now and for the long run. That being said, we'll continue to take a disciplined approach when it comes to capital allocation. If we were to reach a point where we aren't seeing clear indications of progress, we would certainly consider reallocating some capital towards more immediate shareholder return. Of course, always being mindful of our credit metrics.

A key differentiator of the Pacific Gas & Electric Co. story is our performance playbook and focus on waste elimination to deliver better outcomes for our customers. To that end, we've achieved nonfuel O&M savings in excess of our target for three years running. And I'm confident that we will meet or exceed our 2% reduction target again this year. We're also on track to make meaningful improvements in our capital to expense ratio this year and beyond. In 2024, we invested 90¢ of capital for every dollar of expense. We forecast that this year, we'll invest $1.20 of capital for every dollar of expense.

On the regulatory and policy front, we expect a proposed decision on our cost of capital application in November. And as Patty said, important milestones are coming up as stakeholders weigh in to the second phase of SB 254. I'll end here on slide 14 with a reminder of our value proposition enabled by our differentiated performance. We're executing on our simple affordable model by generating annual cost savings for the benefit of our customers, enabling load growth with our five-year capital investment plan, and improving our balance sheet. I'm pleased Fitch has taken the first move to return our parent rating to investment grade. This is just the beginning.

As we continue to prove out our philosophy that performance is power. And now I'll hand it back to Patty.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Thank you, Carolyn. The fundamentals of the Pacific Gas & Electric Co. playbook are undeniable. Strong layers of physical risk mitigation improving every day. Ample runway to continue reducing nonfuel O&M. Rate-reducing load growth serving customers and California's prosperity, improving credit ratings and balance sheet health, and our differentiated rate case proposal as a critical proof point. All of which provide a path for customer bills to be flat to down in 2027 from today. These performance fundamentals set the stage for constructive legislation, but more importantly, a framework that creates prosperity for customers and investors. With that, operator, please open the lines for questions.

Krista: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. We also ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Your first question comes from the line of Steven Isaac Fleishman with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.

Steven Isaac Fleishman: Hi. Good morning. Thanks for the time. And so just on the SB 254, is there any better sense of these steps whether those would be made available that we can see, or are we gonna really more see things toward the end of the process?

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Yeah. Thanks, Steve. On the process front, you know, we do we aren't sure what the CEA is gonna share publicly. We do know just process-wise, the stakeholder abstracts are due November 3, right around the corner. Full submissions by December 12, State agencies will submit final recommendations by January 30, and then that final study from the CEA April 1. We don't know what of those will be public. We're waiting to see that ourselves, but we do know those are the milestone dates.

Steven Isaac Fleishman: Okay. Understood. And then maybe just on the just any at this point, on the cost of capital case, are we just basically waiting for proposed order that process is done otherwise.

Carolyn J. Burke: Yeah. Steve, this is Carolyn. Good morning. Yeah. No. We are. We're we're we're as we've said in the past, we believe we put a really strong case forward, and the PD is expected in November 2025.

Steven Isaac Fleishman: Okay. I will stick to the rules and move on to the next question. Thank you.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: All right. Thanks, Steve.

Krista: Your next question comes from the line of David Keith Arcaro with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

David Keith Arcaro: Hey. Good morning. Thanks. Good morning, David. Morning. I guess, would you expect the policy reform recommendations next April to be prescreened with, like, the legislature and kind of have buy-in advance of then going into the session. You know, is this something that we should have give you a little bit more confidence that kind of vetted and should have a good chance of making it through?

Patricia Kessler Poppe: So guess as we talk about this, David, let's just back up a little bit and talk about where we are, and then we'll talk about where we're going. You know, first and foremost, what we saw from the legislature this year is that they took action. Look. There was concerns, certainly about the fund durability and the risk than that was to shareholders. In the event that the fund were depleted and the disallowance cap was dissolved. So I do wanna just step back and remind everyone this legislature and our governor took action, very quickly. And we're thankful for the action that they took.

And there's some key benefits that I just want to reinforce that have been achieved already. I think there's a lot of obviously, focus on phase two, but let me just remind us what happened in phase one. You know, that protecting the fund and through the continuation account and our disallowance cap was a very important continuation of AB 1054. But there were several improvements to AB 1054 that I just wanna hit really quickly, and I'll get to your process question. You know, moving the disallowance cap date to the date of ignition. I'm gonna call that the unsung hero of SB 254.

A lot of people haven't talked about that, but moving that disallowance kept date to the date of ignition versus after the entire prudence determination process protects investors in the billions of dollars range of lower exposure through the disallowance cap and any dollars that the IOU would have to pay back to the fund. That reduces that exposure dramatically. That was a big improvement. We also, of course, had no upfront contributions. And with a significant portion of the contributions from the IOUs to the fund as a contingent call. Only in the event of a future large utility cost fire that jeopardizes the liquidity of the fund.

That was a much improved source of or method of refueling the fund versus how it was done the first time. And of course, all new IOU contributions to the fund act as credits, against the future regulatory disallowance that, again, was a big improvement. And, individual utility funding has been rebalanced, reducing the amount that certainly Pacific Gas & Electric Co. is paying into the fund by about 25%. So I say all that, as just a reminder to everyone that we have some significant improvements as a result of this phase one process of SB 254. We were very thankful that the governor had leaned in so strongly, though, on phase two.

You know, he did not have to issue an executive order. Their study bills are issued all the time. He wanted to make it clear, I think, that the actions of the CEA and the report and the recommendations and then potential action by the legislature in 2026 was a top priority for him through that executive order. And his comments about a whole of government approach to wildfire is, very important, I think, for California, for our citizens, for all of our customers, and everyone who lives here. Just a very important step to take.

Now what we know is that the comprehensive language that he shared, in both that was both in the actual legislation and in his executive order was good to see. I would suggest it's just flat out too soon to say what the best answer gonna be. We're gonna see this range of proposals. You know, the dates I just reviewed with Steve are the dates that the process will work. Obviously, the governor and the legislative leaders will be having conversation as this process unfolds. And but I would expect that the CEA report should be providing some really good recommendations the legislature on which to act.

David Keith Arcaro: Excellent. No. I appreciate all that color. And the context there for the entire process. Thank you for that. Then maybe a bit of a bit of a separate question here. From what you can tell, is the undergrounding decision still on track for this year? And how should we think about that? Could that still lead to a future acceleration of your undergrounding activities in future GRCs?

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Yep. Procedurally, currently on October 30 here, just a couple days, commission meeting. Currently, the final recommendations on the ten-year undergrounding procedure will be, on it currently is on the agenda. All that to say, you know, we certainly have expressed concern with some of the requirements and some of the methodology associated with determining which miles should be undergrounded. And so we'll be watching closely as the commission provides that direction next week. I will say that you know? And I shared this in our prepared remarks. We do believe that undergrounding remains the appropriate mitigation in some of our miles, not all miles. And I think that's important for people to understand.

Know, the miles that we've been talking about are in our highest risk areas where today, customers are experiencing 10 or more outages as a result of our safety methods. Our safety methods with enhanced power line safety settings certainly reduces the risk for customers and keeps customers safe. However, the outages that go with that safety choice are not acceptable. And so in these areas, we need to have a higher risk reduction through undergrounding and a better customer experience through a resilient energy system, that can stand up for through all sorts of kind weather conditions, both fire hazard conditions as well as extreme snow conditions, etcetera.

So we are we are we continue to be bullish about undergrounding as the most affordable means of both reducing risk and providing resiliency in these highest risk miles and we'll continue to advocate for that. We'll be working with the commission on the time, you know, depending on their timing. On our ten-year filing, and we obviously will need to meet the requirements that the commission outlines. But just to remind everyone, as part of our 2027 GRC, we did include a bridging strategy in the event the ten-year plan were delayed in some way. We did propose bridging strategy to continue our current of undergrounding, which is about 300 miles a year.

And I'm happy to report, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, that we did hit a key milestone of a thousand miles underground, and we've done that. At a 25% lower cost than when we started. And so we continue to improve the cost for customers while we improve their safety and resilience.

David Keith Arcaro: Okay. Great. That's helpful. Thanks so much.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Thanks, David.

Krista: Your next question comes from the line of Julien Patrick Dumoulin-Smith with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Julien Patrick Dumoulin-Smith: Hey. Good morning, company and team. Thank you guys very much. Sir. Hey. Thank you. Just wanted to follow-up. Actually, if I can push a little bit more on the phase two piece, how do you think about that conversation fitting into a broader, more comprehensive focus in the state on reform of insurance? Just wanna understand what your understanding of the scope of the conversation is in the coming year, as well as if there is any nuance to break apart as far as inverse condemnation. I get that IC perhaps is maybe a bridge too far or at least it seems like a big ask.

Are there other ways to dissect this that are relevant that folks should be thinking about? Again, I don't wanna preempt the study per se that's coming out, but how do you think about strict liability conversations more broadly here? As best you can tell. I get it's early.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Yeah. Julian, if I had a crystal ball, you know, I would say that it's too soon to say. The, you know, the governor's comments in his executive order and in the actual legislation itself were clear that it's a whole of government approach to insurance and utilities. Look. Utilities are so important to California's future. We at Pacific Gas & Electric Co. power the tech industry. We power the future prosperity of our state. We think there's a big case to be made that our financial health and our customers' well-being are essential ingredients to California's future.

So we'll look forward to how the study plays out, and we'll look forward to fruitful discussions with many parties to determine the best way to protect customers, preventing catastrophic wildfire in the first place, and then having the right response and a means of compensation for those people who are harmed. So I do look forward to the whole of government approach that the governor's outlined.

Julien Patrick Dumoulin-Smith: Awesome. Excellent. And then just following up a little bit on the nuance of the data center pipeline. It was down slightly here, but you can speak a little bit to what transpired there with the 500 megawatt reduction. But more broadly, as you think about this actually coming into fruition, would you anticipate being able to raise capital as you drive more bill from data center realization, or is that more about the how having a more of a linear read to build reductions writ large?

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Yeah. So I would suggest and this is great news. The most important numbers to look are the ones that are getting closer and closer to construction. So the final engineering numbers went up. And we expect of that 1.6 gigawatts in final engineering, about 95% to be online by 2030. So and some of that's online will be online as soon as next year. So all that to say that I would suggest that our pipeline is rich. There's a lot of that kind of opening of the funnel is a very fluid number. I had a call this week with another customer that's not reflected in those numbers.

So trust me when I say those numbers move a lot, and that's the I think that's good because we're really taking a stand here that any of this new large load that we add here in California is gonna be beneficial to customers. And investors because what that means is we'll be able to invest in the capital to deploy particularly, transmission to build out the and some of the distribution, system to build out that new large load for those customers. But the new revenue from that large load more than offset the cost for customers to fund that CapEx, so we can grow our returns and yet reduce bills for customers.

It's a really important win for California. And then you layer in the tax benefits local property, and sales tax to local communities. I'm in continual conversation with community leaders mayors, etcetera, who are very bullish about this as a source of growth and new revenue for our cities to provide new housing to provide new public safety options. And so there's really a lot of momentum here across the state to make sure that we bring online this new load. Yeah. And maybe I'll just add to your second part of your question there, Julian, as we think about additional capital for these additional data centers. We think about it in three distinct possibilities.

You know, one could make the plan bigger. We could make the plan bigger, but perhaps that's the least likely given that given our current stock valuation. There's also the potential to make the plan better as you went to right, in terms of affordability and driving affordability for our customers by bringing in this beneficial load from data centers. That's a strong possibility. And then we also could just simply make the plan longer in terms of extending our above average growth runway. So that's the way we're thinking about it. And as I said, it's more likely the second or third and not the first.

Julien Patrick Dumoulin-Smith: Yep. Absolutely. Thank you, guys.

Krista: Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Carly S. Davenport with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Carly S. Davenport: Good morning. Thank you so much for taking the questions. Maybe just to start on some of the commentary on the credit side, you obviously highlighted the Fitch upgrade in your prepared remarks. Just curious if anything you can share on conversations with the other agencies and sort how you're thinking about milestones on the path to potential upgrades there as well.

Carolyn J. Burke: Yep. We continue to have good conversations with both Moody's and S&P. And as you know, Fitch just did the upgrade. I would say they're looking for what you're looking for, which is progress on phase two, and that's a that would be a significant trigger for them as they think about our investment grade. They both indicated that, you know, our financial credit metrics meet their investment grade criteria to really looking at the regulatory environment. Moody's is on a typical cycle where we see action in the first quarter, but again, that's really up to their internal assessment of the regulatory environment as well.

Carly S. Davenport: Great. Thank you for that color. And then maybe just on the O&M front, you know, you've executed really well there. Relative to your targets for a number of years now. I guess just you know, help us frame out what it would take for you to have the confidence substantially raise that target, or just curious if that is a potential driver of upside as you think about the 2026 range that you've introduced here?

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Yeah. I'll just say that I just continue to be really odd and proud of my of our Pacific Gas & Electric Co. coworkers and their use of the lean playbook and driving waste out of the system. As you indicated, three years in a row running, and we are on target to meet or exceed the 2% this year. I have no lack of confidence that's gonna continue just you know, we've made, as we indicated, we're seeing significant progress on our capital expense ratio, but we're still fourth quarter. We still have lots of opportunity to go. So I would say that continues to be a driver of our simple, affordable model.

We are continuing to look at our numbers and where there's opportunity. We're not at the point where we're thinking about raising that. We're not raising that 2% for this year, but it is definitely a driver for affordability and our earnings.

Carly S. Davenport: Great. Thank you for the time.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Thanks, Carly.

Krista: Your next question comes from the line of Aidan Kelly with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Aidan Kelly: Good morning. Morning, Amy.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Morning.

Aidan Kelly: Yeah. Just wondering, how comfortable are you with 2026 EPS guidance before you have, you know, resolution on the cost of capital proceeding? I guess just any detail on what outcome ranges are contemplated in this outlook would be great.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Yeah. I think you can rest assured that we plan conservatively. We think we filed a good cost of capital proceeding, or filing. We think there's no lack of evidence that our actual cost of capital is up. All that to say, though, as we build out our plan, and I think you've can start to really see the pattern year after year after year that despite a variety of circumstances, we ride that roller coaster so you don't have to. And we deliver what we say. You know, I think we could all agree. It's a choppy year, and there's been a lot of conversation here in California, and yet we continue to deliver.

And, that's what I want everyone just to get comfortable with that we will plan conservatively under a variety of scenarios and make sure that we're in a position to deliver for customers and investors very consistently.

Aidan Kelly: Got it. That's, that's clear. And then on the storage front, I guess, looks like some, you know, positive momentum here for commerciality with your completion of the CRC energy storage microgrid, with Volt Energy or Energy Vault last month. You know, just curious to what extent do you see this project as, a blueprint for other hires communicate communities as you kinda think about the reliability concerns during, like, safety shutoffs?

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Yeah. We're really excited about that project, and we definitely have other communities that we're preparing to do similar installations. We have every time we do these, we learn. This will be another opportunity for us to learn. Look. Our ideal scenario is that, number one, we have less outages through infrastructure built for purpose, aka undergrounding. And then in cases where public safety power shutoffs are a necessary part of our safety toolkit, which they are, minimize exposure by sectionalizing devices by some of these microgrids to harden, to protect downtown so that they can have critical services during a public safety power shutoff. We wanna make these outages invisible to our customers and keep them safe.

So that's the whole suite of operational opportunities that we have. We're gonna continue to pursue those.

Aidan Kelly: Great. Thanks. I'll leave it there.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Thanks, Aidan.

Krista: Your next question comes from the line of Gregg Gillander Orrill with UBS. Please go ahead.

Gregg Gillander Orrill: Morning, Greg. Hi. Thanks for taking the question. How do you how do you think about the direction of the payout ratio beyond 2028 if that's possible to know at this stage?

Carolyn J. Burke: Well, as we have indicated in our last call that we are growing the dividend to a 20% payout to 2028 and then maintaining it through 2030 at 20%.

Gregg Gillander Orrill: Got it. That's helpful. Thank you.

Krista: And that concludes our question and answer session. I will now turn the conference back over to Patricia Kessler Poppe, Chief Executive Officer, for closing comments.

Patricia Kessler Poppe: Thanks, Krista. Well, thank you, everyone. We appreciate you joining us. You know, as I hope you hear today, we're on full speed here at Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Our entire team is working to deliver for our customers and for you, our investors, every day. You can expect nothing less. With that, we look forward to seeing you at EEI.

Krista: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation and you may now disconnect.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.