IT Consulting Is Not Having a Good Time

In this episode of Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Fool contributors Tyler Crowe, Matt Frankel, and Jon Quast discuss:

• Data centers might have a climate problem.
• A dive into Accenture’s earnings.
• The challenges facing the IT consulting industry.
• The SEC’s proposed change from quarterly reports to two times a year. Read our full statement at https://www.fool.com/savethe10q and learn how to submit a public comment to the SEC.

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

This podcast was recorded on June 18, 2026.

Tyler Crowe: The SaaS Apocalypse was the wrong apocalypse, today on Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I’m your host, Tyler Crowe, and today I’m joined by longtime Fool contributors, Matt Frankel and Jon Quast. We're going to get into the kind of decline, I guess, if you will, of the IT services consulting industry over the past couple of years, based on Accenture's earnings that were released earlier today. We're also going to do something a little bit different. It's a special message from Motley Fool at the end here.

But we're going to start today with a recent report on how climate could be a much bigger factor for data centers than originally thought. Now, Matt, you originally brought this idea to the table with us. What was the market missing about data centers that this report was bringing out?

Matt Frankel: Yes, so it was a study by First Street that was released today. It analyzed 97 different data center markets around the world. The headline is that nearly 90% of our global data center capacity today, not what's being built, is at an elevated risk from climate-related hazards, think flooding, think windstorms, wildfires. Most underwriting, when you're buying insurance for real estate, it still uses historical data, which isn't doing a good job of predicting how climate events perform today. I know Jon lives in Florida. This is why a lot of insurers have exited Florida because the past-looking data isn't doing a good job.

Data centers are generally expected to operate for 20-30 years, so this could become a big problem, especially as we rely more heavily on data centers for all of our AI infrastructure needs. Some of the most exposed markets are international, like, Asia Pacific is the worst, but Northern Virginia, which we would call the data center capital of the United States, has an above-average level of exposure here. Here's the key takeaway, and this is confirmed by separate research, not just this study: By 2030, more than half of data center hubs are going to find their water supplies stressed due to their cooling demand. Data centers produce a lot of heat. They actually create what are known as heat islands by warming the land around them by as much as 16 degrees in documented cases. Now, all of this can be mitigated at least on the building level. You could build buildings to be flood-resistant, and something that you see all the time in Florida. You can see power sources being upgraded. You can see cooling systems, but the stress on the supporting infrastructure, the power grids, the roads, the water supply in the local area, it's a real problem that's being overlooked.

Tyler Crowe: This is definitely a topic that's been bubbling up from time to time and kind of manifesting in various ways, and also not mentioned, like in their report, and I think we’re all hinting at it, too, is that data centers are really expensive. The cost of these and getting them right makes a lot of sense, you're saying flood-resistant buildings and whatnot. But I'm thinking of, like, Meta's Hyperion Data Center, which is being built in Northeast Louisiana, that's expected to be a $200 billion facility. If you have to insure a warehouse, that's maybe a few million dollars, that's one thing, but $200 billion insurance or trying to mitigate that risk when you're doing construction is a big deal, because over the next 20 or 30 years, who knows what's going to happen? I have a two-part question for you both. Is there a specific part of the market within this AI infrastructure data center build-out that you see this report actually impacting? Then, on a scale of 1-10, 10 being the most actionable, how actionable is this to investing in that specific market?

Jon Quast: Well, let me just start with the 1-10 scale. In isolation, I would say this report from First Street is actionably a one. I don't want to say that there's nothing wrong here with the climate whatsoever or anything wrong with the study, but let's be clear. First Watch, it's on a mission to connect climate and financial risks together. That's why it exists as a research firm. It doesn't surprise me that it's sounding the alarm a little bit here on preparedness for climate risk. Some of the key constituents here would actually push back, including some of those who are building the data centers, saying, we're very aware of the climate risks, and we're already taking measures to counter those risks. I don't think there's anything really new here personally from the First Street report.

Now, that's it, I mean, there is a huge build-out trend, and there are lots of constraints that we're running up against. It's not just climate-related. I mean, you look at just the land issue that it takes. We need more data centers for AI, or at least they want to build more data centers for AI. Guess what? A lot of people are becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the land in their city, in their county being used for that purpose. Right or wrong, that is the perception that's growing. Power is also something that's coming up against the wall. Even chips. I think this is an interesting one. There's some as far as how much compute we want to put in these data centers. Is Taiwan's Semiconductor even capable of churning out that many right now? Elon Musk would say no, which is why he's investing in the Terafab, and we need more, and there's no player out there that can supply everything that we need. There are many constraints.

As far as actionability, when it comes to that, I would say it's more of like a five. There are a lot of constraints that are worth thinking about. I think there's a place in your portfolio to think about smart use of limited resources. In my portfolio, for example, I have Badger meter. This is for water management. That to me just makes sense. We need to be smarter with our water, and you can do that with the products and services that Badger Meter supplies. I can see a case for Itron, which is more power management, stuff like that, but then, man, I also think about if we do run up against some walls here in the build-out, that is kind of an issue because there are some stretched valuations in the stock market. A slowdown in the build-out could impact those things. Just some things to keep an eye on.

Matt Frankel: Yes, so I would say the cooling solutions for data centers in particular are an excellent opportunity to invest in this right here. Vertiv's symbol is VRT. That's one of the most direct ways you can invest in this. They make power management systems, thermal management systems, and liquid cooling systems, all for data centers. It's already been one of the best-performing AI infrastructure stocks in recent years. But the massive cooling needs, especially as from the climate-related issues, are not totally priced in yet. I'm also at a five or so when it comes to actionability, and the reason is because the need for data center cooling was already an investible trend. This is not new because of a climate study. This is why stocks like Vertiv have performed so well. This certainly adds to the bull thesis, which is why I kind of split the difference with a five.

Tyler Crowe: I'm perplexed by this one, too, because my immediate thought when I saw this was to that point about Meta, and it's 200 billion — billion with a B — facility. I started thinking about insurance, because how the heck does a single insurance company insure a $200 billion building for something like flood insurance or/and hurricane insurance? From an actionability standpoint, I can see this being a huge risk, and almost to my thing, it's like a six or seven, but it's really hard for me to figure out specifically where that risk is located. I'm not looking at Berkshire Hathaway's GEICO doing auto and homeowner insurance, as that's going to be an essential existential risk for somebody like that, but there is somewhere along the chain of insurance that is going to be tied to these massive data center build-out, probably somewhere in the excess and surplus industry. I don't know where it is, but I definitely want to go digging and find out. Coming up after the break, we're going to talk about IT consultancies and why they're doing so lousy lately.

ADVERTISEMENT: Innovation has always kept the world moving forward, but it also comes with risk in a world that is as complex and unpredictable as it is exciting. AXA XL is facing into risk. As a leading global insurer, we constantly push the boundaries to protect your business and power your innovations.

AXA XL facing into risk for a future to be imagined. This advertisement doesn't constitute an offer or solicitation nor a description of any products or services of AXA XL.

Tyler Crowe: Now, we talked a little bit about the SaaS Apocalypse, where AI is going to eat anything software, and maybe some of that's a little overblown. Maybe some are going to do well, some are going to fail. But one place that I think is getting not nearly as much conversation related to the doom and gloom is the ICT consultancy and IT services industry because this is an industry that's hurting even worse. And just as an example, shares of Accenture are down about 17% today, as we're taping after the company reported its fiscal third quarter results. It was a story that we heard quite a bit. Numbers for the quarter look relatively fine, but it's the things that didn't really get said that had everyone worried. That's what I think we saw, right Matt?

Matt Frankel: Yes, I mean, as you said, the numbers look fine, and that's a good word for it. Revenue was up 6% year over year, basically in line with estimates. Earnings were up 9%, slightly beat estimates. Operating margin showed a pretty solid improvement, and to be fair, management is showing really good cost discipline. That's why margins are growing. That's why earnings are growing faster than revenue. But revenue guidance was narrowed to 3-4% for the full year from previous range of 3-5%, so slightly lower. There's no more sure-fire way to make a stock go down than to lower your guidance. Earnings growth is supposed to be about 10-11% for the year. It's fine, but nothing to get excited about. The guidance, like I said, is the biggest drag on the stock. The percent to 3-4% earnings growth, quite frankly, doesn't justify much more than 13 times earnings it's trading at after this drop.

Tyler Crowe: Yes, the SaaS Apocalypse has been a topic that's often covered in financial media, and certainly, we've dipped our toes into it from time to time. It makes for pretty good chatter, and at the same time, there's a lot of people who have stocks in the SaaS Apocalypse trade that have not done so well recently. Now, thesis thesis that kind of had mixed results so far. Well, we haven't probably spent enough time is on this IT consultancy apocalypse. Over the past decade, shares of Accenture are up a meagre 32%, and it's after probably almost a 50% drop from their high. Accenture is one of the best-performing IT consultancies over that time. You look at companies like Globant or EXL Services. These are all companies that are doing far worse, and it's really impacting not just like any single company, but anybody who's invested in this industry is really hurting.

Matt Frankel: Yes, I mean, Tyler, we've sold some of those in our Hidden Gem services throughout The Fool and for that reason because it's an undercovered story, but it is really hurting lately, and I mean, on the other side of it, we've added some stocks that have IT consultancy businesses, but do a lot of other things that are getting ahead of the AI curve. I'm going to mention one of those in just a minute, but it's we have been seeing this for a while now.

Tyler Crowe: Yes, and this is I feel like a quandary for most investors because so far the financial numbers for all of these mentioned IT services companies they're still OK. Revenue is still growing. It's not as good as it was, but I wouldn't say like five-alarm fire sort of things. A lot of the stock decline has been basically drastic changes in market sentiment and stock valuation resets. I want to get both of your opinions on this one, and, Jon, I'm going to go to you first. These valuations, deeply depressed stock prices. Is there a company in this industry that's worth considering or based on what you've seen from AI and some of the threats we've seen recently, is this just like a no-go area until they can figure out how to compete or build businesses that are more complementary to AI?

Jon Quast: Yes, for me, the IT space is completely uninvestable right now, it's a no-go. Now, that said, I mean, it's just a space that's going to be full of losers, I think. Now, not to say there's not going to be any winners in the space, but I just prefer to avoid the entire space, because there are so many land mines out there. You mentioned that the numbers are still OK, and that is a good point, but the counterpoint to that is we do want to sell our businesses before the numbers turn bad. If we have a reasonable suspicion that the numbers could turn negative in the future, then we kind of want to get out in front of that before it actually manifests, because at that point, the stock is probably going to be even down more than it is right now.

As we look out in the IT space, I do think this kind of a business gets tougher the further I look out and there's reasons for this. I do think that personalized advice from a human person is a dying art form. For better or for worse, I would personally say probably a little bit more towards the worst, but it is being replaced by AI, this personalized input into your business, into your life. AI is doing that more and more than a human. I think you could make the argument that ChatGPT is already the world's largest mental health services provider. We can say, you shouldn't be going to ChatGPT for mental health assistance.

Maybe that's right, but people are, and that's the point here. Think about somebody like Tim Ferriss, recently coming out. This is the author of The Four-Hour Work Week. Recently coming out and saying that his sales in 2026 are trending 80% lower than in 2022, based on the data he has so far, and that is a very steep 50 or greater than 50% drop off this year in his sales compared to last year, and last year was another huge drop off. Increasingly, you're seeing where somebody would have gone to a book like that before and said, how can I personalize this for me? Now just going straight to the AI and saying, How can you personalize this concept for me, and it does it for you, and we kind of have this sense that AI knows me better, that it can personalize it better, that we can even guide it to tell us a little bit what we want. I think that's what we're all looking for, whether we like to admit it or not, whereas a person might tell you something you don't want to hear. We are doing this more and more. I think the business space is happening more and more that way. Businesses were maybe going to Accenture to get advice on how to implement AI, and now you can really just ask AI how to implement itself.

Matt Frankel: Yes, so, I mean, if you believe that Accenture's revenue is going to stabilize at that 3% to 5% long term growth rate, it could be a solid value here. I mean, you'll get a nearly 4% dividend yield while you the business produces over $10 billion of free cash flow a year, and you're getting it at a low double-digit earnings multiple. I'm not buying it, but there could be value there. One that is on my radar, and it's the most recent position I've bought in my portfolio is IBM. They have an IT consulting business that they consider kind of their legacy business. It's been under pressure just like Accenture's, but they also have their infrastructure business, their mainstream business, the mainframe business, their software business. There are several areas of their business, including those where AI adoption is actually a major tailwind.

Whenever you have an industry that's in the midst of disruption and uncertainty, I like to look for companies that do a lot of other things well, too. The recent confluent acquisition certainly moves IBM further from relying on their legacy revenue streams. Management is also doing a great job of being on the forefront of new trends. I can't name a publicly traded company that's further along in quantum computing, just to name one example. IBM is the way I would play the space right now, and I have, but I wouldn't be buying Accenture or any of the other peer plays.

Jon Quast: To circle back to what Matt was saying about Accenture possibly being a value here or at least laying out, but it does make a little bit of sense from a value perspective. If you're in that camp, just keep in mind a few things with Accenture, announcing over $4 billion in cybersecurity acquisitions today, and the acquired businesses don't earn a profit. When you think about the future earnings of Accenture, they're going to come down more than likely, at least temporarily while these things scale. Also, the acquisitions it made at 20 times enterprise value to annual recurring revenue. That's not exactly cheap. The perceived value with Accenture, just be careful when you're looking at those backward-looking metrics. I might not be quite the value that it seems to be, and the acquisitions that it's making kind of aggressively are what is going to cause the future value.

Tyler Crowe: Well, certainly, the outlook for these is probably one of the less certain times we've seen in the IT consulting services. We're going to do something a little bit differently in the next segment, and it's actually just gonna be me. I want to say thank you to Jon and Matt before we go off to the break. We'll talk to you guys this time next week.

ADVERTISEMENT: AI risk isn't always easy to see. There are unapproved tools and agents with too much access to systems. Unmanaged AI exposure isn't just a threat. It's untenable, but with the right security partner, you can prioritize risk and take control. Get the context you need to take action and reduce your exposure. Take your AI risk from untenable to tenable. Tenable, your exposure ends here. Learn more at tenable.com.

ADVERTISEMENT: Nobody asks to have a lifetime of memories slowly erased. Nobody asks to have a loved one not recognize them. Nobody asks to feel lonely and confused, but today, you could change this by leaving a gift in your will to Alzheimer's Society. You'll help fund life-changing support, vital campaigning, and groundbreaking research to tackle Britain's biggest killer. Discover the impact your gift can make. Search Alzheimer's Society Wills.

Tyler Crowe: Hey, Fools, it's just me for this last segment because we, The Motley Fool, want to take a moment to talk about something important happening right now that affects every individual investor. The SEC is proposing to allow public companies to cut their financial reporting in half from four times a year to twice a year. The stated goal is to reduce short-term, short-term thinking in corporate America, and we do. We think that's a noble goal, but this isn't the fix that we're looking for. Here's the thing. When you own a stock, you're a part-owner of that business. Management works for you. Quarterly reports are your regular look inside the business you own, the financials, the trends, management's own account of what's happening and why. Institutional investors and big Wall Street firms can get this in so many ways and spend millions of dollars and have armies of analysts to figure this stuff out.

We as individual investors don't have those resources. We have quarterly reports. You cut that to twice a year, and you double the information gap between insiders and the rest of us. The research backs this up. When the U.K. tried something similar, corporate investment behavior didn't change at all. The only thing that changed was how much information individual investors had to work with. 26 years ago, The Motley Fool community helped pass Regulation Fair Disclosure by flooding the SEC with comment letters. It was pivotal in leveling the playing field between Wall Street and individual investors. We can do it again. The public comment window for this proposal closes on July 6. No, you can head to fool.com/savethe10q to read our full breakdown and submit your comment. The link for this special request is also going to be in the show notes. It takes five minutes, and it matters. This is your market. This is your business. We want you to make your voice heard.

That's all the time we have for today. I'm going to hit disclosure when I'm gonna get out of here just by myself. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. Don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements, sponsored content, and provide for informational purposes only. See our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks to producer Barb Chen and the rest of The Motley Fool team. For Matt, Jon, and myself. Thanks for listening, and we'll chat again soon.

Jon Quast has positions in Badger Meter. Matt Frankel, CFP® has positions in Berkshire Hathaway and International Business Machines. Tyler Crowe has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Accenture Plc, Berkshire Hathaway, Globant, International Business Machines, Itron, Meta Platforms, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Tesla, and Vertiv. The Motley Fool recommends ExlService and recommends the following options: long January 2028 $260 calls on Accenture Plc and short January 2028 $280 calls on Accenture Plc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.