VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF offers a lower-volatility profile and a higher 1.9% dividend yield compared to State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF.
State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF provides broad exposure with 155 holdings, whereas VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF is concentrated in 26 major drugmakers.
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF delivered a $1,619 total return on a $1,000 investment over five years, significantly higher than the $1,267 return from State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF.
The VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (NASDAQ:PPH) offers concentrated exposure to established global drugmakers and higher yields, while the State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (NYSEMKT:XBI) provides a diversified, higher-volatility play on smaller-cap biotechnology innovation.
Both funds offer paths into the healthcare sector but serve very different roles in a diversified portfolio. One focuses on the established stability and cash flows of global pharmaceutical giants, while the other captures the high-risk, high-reward nature of early stage biotechnology research. This analysis examines which profile fits your strategy.
| Metric | XBI | PPH |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | SPDR | VanEck |
| Share price | $156.86 (as of 2026-08-13) | $111.52 (as of 2026-08-13) |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.36% |
| 1-yr return (as of 2026-08-13) | 76.0% | 33.6% |
| Dividend yield | 0.4% | 1.9% |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.45 |
| AUM | $10.7 billion | $979.8 million |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
While the management fees are virtually identical, the income profiles differ greatly. The VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF provides a significantly higher payout for income-seeking investors, offering a 1.9% yield compared to just 0.4% for the State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF.
| Metric | XBI | PPH |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (54.0%) | (20.3%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,267 | $1,619 |
The VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF concentrates its assets in the healthcare sector, specifically targeting companies involved in the production and sales of pharmaceuticals. Its largest positions include Eli Lilly & Co (NYSE:LLY) at 19.99%, Merck (NYSE:MRK) at 10.19%, and Novartis (NYSE:NVS) at 10.10%. With only 26 holdings, it is far more top-heavy than its biotech rival. The fund was launched in 2011. VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF has paid $2.17 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$111.5 share price works out to a 1.9% yield.
The State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF also maintains 100% healthcare exposure but employs a modified equal-weighted approach to track the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. Its largest positions include Twist Bioscience (NASDAQ:TWST) at 1.73%, Oruka Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ORKA) at 1.57%, and Apogee Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ:APGE) at 1.52%. It provides exposure to 155 different companies, mitigating the risk of any single clinical trial failure. The fund was launched in 2006. State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF has paid $0.57 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$156.9 share price works out to a 0.4% yield.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Pharmaceutical giants and biotechnology start-ups represent different bets on the future of medicine. Established drugmakers like Eli Lilly and Merck generate billions in revenue from products already on the market, fund their own research, and return income to shareholders along the way. The smaller biotech companies are playing a different game entirely. Most are racing to get a single drug approved, and the difference between a successful trial and a failed one can move a stock by 50% overnight.
That risk profile is baked into both funds. PPH's concentration in proven pharmaceutical heavyweights means investors get income and relative stability, but limited exposure to the explosive upside that comes when a smaller company hits it big. XBI's equal-weight approach across 155 primarily small-cap names means the fund captures that upside when the biotech cycle turns, and absorbs the full force of the downside when it doesn't.
XBI has dramatically outperformed PPH over the past year, riding a strong small-cap biotech rally driven by M&A activity and a busy FDA approval calendar. For investors who want pharmaceutical income and stability, PPH is the stronger choice today. For those who believe the biotech innovation cycle has further to run, XBI is the higher-conviction, higher-risk bet.
Before you buy stock in SPDR Series Trust - SPDR S&P Biotech ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SPDR Series Trust - SPDR S&P Biotech ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $409,970!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,381,040!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 969% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 215% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2026.
Sara Appino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Eli Lilly, Merck, and Twist Bioscience. The Motley Fool recommends SPDR Series Trust - SPDR S&P Biotech ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.