AMAL Q1 2026 Earnings Transcript

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Thursday, April 23, 2026 at 11 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

• President & Chief Executive Officer — Priscilla Sims Brown
• Chief Financial Officer — Jason W. Darby
• Head of Client Segments — Sam Brown

TAKEAWAYS

• Net Revenue -- $93.4 million, representing 9.7% growth driven by broad-based deposit strength.
• Net Interest Margin -- Increased 9 basis points to 3.75%, attributed to higher-yielding commercial loan originations and reduced funding costs.
• Net Loans -- Rose $66 million, a 1.3% increase led by commercial real estate; C&I, commercial real estate, and multifamily loans collectively grew $109 million or 3.3%.
• PACE Portfolio -- Expanded by 1.2% to $1.3 billion, with $15.8 million in new assessments.
• Total Deposits -- Increased $229 million to $8.2 billion, reflecting continued momentum across political, labor, and not-for-profit segments.
• Average Noninterest-Bearing Deposits -- Rose to 41% of total deposits, supporting funding diversification.
• Super Core Deposits -- Approached 60% of on-balance sheet deposits, underscoring funding stability.
• Political Deposits -- Climbed $133 million to $1.9 billion in advance of midterm elections.
• Net Income -- Reported at $25.2 million, or $0.84 per diluted share; core net income was $24.1 million, or $0.80 per diluted share.
• Net Interest Income -- Increased 3% to $80.2 million, aligning with internal guidance.
• Core Noninterest Income -- Improved $1.1 million to $11.2 million, benefiting from higher commercial banking fees and discrete billing income.
• Expenses -- Reported expense decrease of $0.5 million; core expenses rose $0.3 million to $45.3 million, primarily due to branch renovations and professional fees.
• Core Efficiency Ratio -- Improved to 49.55% as operating scale increased.
• Tier 1 Leverage Ratio -- Remained strong at 9.33%.
• Nonperforming Assets -- Increased to $99.3 million or 1.08% of total assets, primarily from a single multifamily relationship.
• Allowance for Credit Losses -- Rose to $68.2 million, reaching 1.35% of total loans.
• Reserve Build -- $9.2 million provision associated with one borrower; reserves now $11.1 million for that relationship, impacting earnings per share by $0.23.
• Guidance Raised -- Net interest income target increased to $333 million; core pretax preprovision earnings target lifted to $183 million.
• Balance Sheet Growth Target -- Updated to approximately 8% for 2026, with year-end asset target of $9.6 billion.
• ICS Fee Income -- Increased $1 million sequentially, with management expecting continued strength through 2026.
• Second Quarter Net Interest Income Estimate -- Projected between $81 million and $83 million.
• Loan Growth Target -- Sequential net loan growth forecast at 1.5%-2%, with balanced contributions expected from C&I and multifamily portfolios.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS

• The $9.2 million incremental provision for one multifamily borrower resulted in all ten loans in that $78 million relationship being placed on nonaccrual, raising nonperforming assets and criticized and classified loans by $51.6 million.
• GAAP earnings per share were reduced by $0.23 due to this reserve; management characterized this event as isolated but with continued uncertainty around timing of resolution.
• Non-GAAP net interest margin is expected to moderately decline in the second quarter, reflecting balance sheet growth and the impact of newly nonaccrual loans.

SUMMARY

Management conveyed confidence in ongoing core earnings momentum and balance sheet stability supported by strong capital and diversified deposit growth. The sole material credit event—an isolated multifamily borrower default—drove a discrete reserve build and affected several key risk metrics but was explicitly described as contained and not representative of portfolio-wide deterioration. The company increased all major forward targets, citing accelerated asset growth, steady fee income outlook, and the durability of balanced, mission-driven funding sources. New disclosures, including a detailed breakdown of D.C. Metro real estate exposure, reflected a commitment to transparency in addressing asset quality concerns.

• Management expects further acceleration of political, labor, and not-for-profit deposits through the midterm cycle, maintaining deposit mix advantage.
• ICS (Insured Cash Sweep) fee income is anticipated to remain robust, supporting revenue diversification ambitions.
• The balance of loan growth is expected to shift increasingly toward mission-aligned C&I and multifamily segments while closely monitoring credit and concentration risks.
• Future resolution of the single stressed borrower in the multifamily segment may involve foreclosure or asset sales, with the company prepared to take title if necessary.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

• PACE: Property Assessed Clean Energy—fixed-rate financing for energy efficiency and renewable projects, repaid via property tax bills, often seen in commercial and multifamily portfolios.
• ICS: Insured Cash Sweep—a service enabling large depositors to access multi-bank FDIC insurance through a single institution, with associated fee income for banks managing these flows.
• CPACE: Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy—PACE financing specifically for commercial real estate properties.
• Super Core Deposits: Internal classification referring to high-stability, relationship-driven deposits, considered most durable during liquidity stress.
• Section 8 Rapid Rehousing: Local and federal government-subsidized housing programs referenced as influencing certain multifamily borrower cash flows and credit performance.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Priscilla Sims Brown: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I want to begin by thanking our colleagues across the bank as always for their continued focus and execution and our customers and shareholders for their trust and partnership. Overall, we delivered a very strong first quarter that underscores the strength of our balance sheet and purpose-driven model. We grew net revenue by 9.7% to $93.4 million. We expanded net interest margin 9 basis points to 3.75%, increased on-balance sheet deposits, $229 million to $8.2 billion and maintain strong Tier 1 capital at above 9.3%. Before commenting on the additional reserves we took this quarter, I'd like to dive into our results just a bit deeper.

Our deposit franchise continued to perform exceptionally well with broad-based strength across our core segments. Political deposits increased $133 million to $1.9 billion as the midterm elections approach. The labor franchise generated $106 million of growth, and not-for-profit deposits grew $115 million. Deposit mix was also improved with average noninterest-bearing deposits increasing to 41% of total deposits. Finally, super core deposits are approaching 60% of total on-balance sheet deposits, demonstrating the stable, durable funding that is unique to Amalgamated. We chose to keep more deposits on balance sheet this quarter to drive core net interest income as the portfolio repositioning from selling lower-yielding securities is largely behind us.

We plan to manage through the midterm election cycle with sufficient off-balance sheet deposits to absorb expected political deposit outflows after the elections which should result in no borrowings post election. Loan growth was solid with net loans up approximately $66 million or 1.3% led by strong commercial real estate lending production. Loans in our growth mode categories, C&I, commercial real estate and multifamily grew $109 million or 3.3%, reflecting solid originations, healthy mission in demand and continued credit discipline. Our PACE portfolio also expanded with total assessments of $15.8 million of 1.2% and bringing our PACE portfolio to approximately $1.3 billion.

Now let me briefly address the additional reserves we took in the quarter, and Jason will have some further details as well. Included in our results was an incremental $9.2 million provision tied to a single borrower multifamily relationship that moved to nonaccrual during the quarter. The underlying collateral supports our position, and we are aggressively pursuing resolution options to preserve and optimize value. We view this as an isolated event with one borrower, which does not change our performance outlook. The reserve bill impacted earnings per share by $0.23 and yet we delivered solid core earnings of $0.80 per share.

With the momentum we saw in the quarter, we are focused on executing and delivering on our revenue and earnings targets over the balance of the year, and you will see our optimism when Jason discusses our guidance increase in just a few minutes. Looking ahead, our strategy builds on who we are and why customers choose amalgamate it mission-focused organizations and individuals who see confidence that their capital is responsibly aligned with a partner who shares their purpose. That focus resonates nationally with customers in every state enabling relationship-based banking and efficient growth within our model.

We see real opportunity to expand thoughtfully and consolidate market share in our core segments as we continue investing in people infrastructure and technology to support disciplined profitable growth, including progressing past $10 billion in assets. Now I'll turn the call over to Jason.

Jason Darby: Thank you, Priscilla. I'll keep things moving so we can get to Q&A. On Slide 3, net income was $25.2 million or $0.84 per diluted share while core net income, a non-GAAP measure, was $24.1 million or $0.80 per diluted share. The GAAP to core difference was driven primarily by strong off-balance sheet income as ICS fee income increased $1 million versus the linked quarter. And we anticipate ICS fee income will be strong throughout 2026, and we also plan to keep more deposits on balance sheet to build the bank's core earnings power. Net interest income increased 3% to $80.2 million, in line with our quarterly guidance.

Additionally, our net interest margin expanded to 3.75% driven by higher-yielding commercial loan originations and modest reductions in overall funding costs, though we expect our net interest margin to moderately decline in the second quarter related to balance sheet growth. On Slide 4, core noninterest income increased $1.1 million to $11.2 million, primarily from higher commercial banking fees and also $0.7 million of discrete billing income. Noninterest income has continued to deliver solid growth over the past year, reflecting meaningful progress towards our 85/15 diversification objective. Expenses decreased $0.5 million, while core expenses increased $0.3 million to $45.3 million.

The rise in core expenses was mainly due to branch renovation and relocation costs and professional fees partially offset by a decrease in advertising expenses. Core expenses are tracking to our $188 million full year target. Our core efficiency ratio improved to 49.55% and demonstrating profitable scale and keeping us on track to deliver our 2026 goals. Now despite the reserve increase headwind, I'll address shortly, the quarter showed continued momentum and resilience across key metrics. Tier 1 leverage remained strong at 9.33% and revenue per share exceeded $3 for the first time in the bank's history. Illustratively, excluding the reserve build, return on average assets would have been 1.41% and return on tangible common equity, 15.76%.

And while the setback is clear, we remain encouraged by our trajectory and the strength of the franchise value we've built. Now let's go to Slide 10 and spend some time on credit quality. Last quarter, we discussed one borrower in our D.C. market that showed stress related to their use of the Section 8 rapid rehousing program resulting in increased reserves of $1.9 million across 3 loans and a related $10.3 million increase in nonaccrual multifamily loans. There were also another 3 loans totaling $26.2 million with this borrower and a minority sponsor that were moved to criticized status. At that time, we were working with this bar and the minority sponsor to restructure this portion of their portfolio.

Before we close the first quarter, the borrower indicated an expected default resulting in the classification of all 10 loans within the $78 million relationship, which included the 4 remaining performing loans of $41.5 million. Additional specific reserves, $9.2 million were established across the relationship at varying levels based on loan level assessments, including consideration of collateral values reflected in third-party appraisals, occupancy and in-place cash flows. Reserves on this borrower relationship now total $11.1 million.

We are evaluating resolution alternatives, which may include foreclosure, note sales or other exit strategies, and while the bank has not historically taken title to foreclosed properties, it is prepared to do so if necessary, and we'll engage an experienced third-party property manager to preserve and maximize value prior to disposition. As a result, nonperforming assets rose to $99.3 million or 1.08% of total assets, while criticized and classified loans increased $51.6 million primarily related to downgrades on the single borrower, I just discussed. The allowance for credit losses increased to $68.2 million, representing 1.35% of total loans, providing appropriate reserve coverage.

Excluding the provision increase discussed above, the provision expense would have been $4.2 million, primarily driven by expected consumer charge-offs and adding a specific reserve on a multifamily loan that moved to nonaccrual status during the quarter, offset by credit losses releases due to lower required reserves on C&I and consumer loans. In keeping with our practice of helpful disclosure, we have added a slide on Page 12 illustrating our D.C. Metro area real estate exposure. We believe this situation to be borrower specific and we'll be happy to answer follow-up questions. I'll wrap up by turning to guidance on Slide 13, where we are raising our targets.

Net interest income target is raised to $333 million, and core pretax preprovision earnings target is raised to $183 million. This guidance raise is connected to our new annual balance sheet growth target of approximately 8% for 2026 as we derive more core earnings power from deposit gathering. We anticipate this to have a powerful and sustained positive impact on NII growth, and we estimate net interest income to increase to between $81 million to $83 million in the second quarter. I do want to close on a positive note because we've accomplished a great deal.

And even as we work through the specific challenge, our fundamentals are strong. we've delivered consistent revenue growth, exceptional deposit gathering, continued loan growth, disciplined cost management and solid capital, all of which keep us confident in our ability to deliver on our targets for the balance of the year and into the future. We're now ready for questions. Operator?

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of David Konrad with KBW.

David Konrad: I've got a few questions here. One on the credit, obviously. Just talk a little bit about -- I mean 2 questions here, a little bit about your comfort with loan-to-value of about 85% on this relationship and maybe closer to 60% on the rest of your D.C. exposure. So as you work through this, a, do you think you have enough margin here with that loan to value? And then, b, this is probably a more difficult question, but any idea on any thoughts on the strategy like timing of resolution, what we should expect over the coming quarters?

Jason Darby: Sure. David, it's Jason. I'll answer the second question first and then talk a little bit more about the LTVs. From a resolution perspective, it's difficult to say the news is fairly new to us, and there were ongoing negotiations with the borrower that have since been changed. So where this just will end up from a resolution perspective, I don't have the best answer for you in terms of predictability. But what I can say is the reserving that we took for the current quarter was really designed to limit any volatility that you might see going through the P&L into future quarters.

And if I think about broadly how timing might play out, we talked last quarter about this borrower relationship and where it was heading and there were 3 loans that were classified as nonaccrual at that point in time, totaling about $10.3 million. those would probably be the most likely to resolve sooner. The other ones where there is better collateral value and the bank is considering pursuing foreclosure amongst other options, there may be a longer tail on that, but I am confident that the volatility through the P&L will be well contained with the amount of reserves that we put up in the current quarter. And maybe that leads into an answer now on the valuation.

And we think of this borrower relationship and we are best to carve it out of that, DC profile that we provided for investors in the earnings deck. So we think of this as a separate situation from a value perspective. If I look broadly across the relationship, it's 10 different loans that total $78 million, four them or $41 million weren't performing status before we received notification of the intent not to pay. So the reserve that we put in place that now totals $11 million effectively get us to that 85% valuation.

And we think that we took a very conservative approach with that valuation at this point in time, for the purpose of making sure that we accounted for cost to sell or other types of embedded expense that might be recognized in relation to the situation that we're going to have to deal with here for the next few quarters. But the reality of it is we think that, that reserve is pretty well contained at the moment. I wouldn't say that it's evenly distributed across all the loans.

I think it's more weighted towards some of the loans that we previously disclosed and what I also hope is that, that allows for us to have staged exits to the property situation as time unfolds.

David Konrad: Okay. That makes sense. Maybe moving to better news, the outlook, the improved outlook. Net interest income for the full year, the net $331 million to $333 million range, just wondered, Jason, if you could break down a little bit on the guide in terms of how you think both NIM will progress through the year, but also the balance sheet side as well? I mean you talked a little bit about that going into next quarter.

Jason Darby: Certainly. Yes, I think the balance sheet size, let's start there because that will be a key driver of how the margin will ultimately start to play out. But the balance sheet ought to end up on a spot basis at around $9.6 billion. It's potentially moving around a little bit, but that's moving up about $400 million from our original target. So we had originally targeted 5% growth going to $9.2 billion. We're now targeting $9.6 billion by the end of the year or around 8% growth.

Now we've gotten through a fair amount of that in the first quarter or the first quarter alone, the balance sheet grew to about $9.2 billion, and that was about $400 million of growth right there -- I'm sorry, $300 million of growth right there. So we're going to start to see the benefit of that asset expansion rolling through NII. We've projected $81 million to $83 million of NII for the second quarter, and we expect that to ramp upward as we continue to go throughout the year. And so as I think about the margin, we will see a little bit of compression when we get into the second quarter.

There'll be a little bit of nonaccrual impact from the loans that we've just discussed that we'll have to bake into the margin. But as we continue to move throughout the year, we're expecting to see it expand and expand modestly from where we are today. I wouldn't expect it to be materially different, but I do expect it to expand to be modestly above where we are today after accounting for a slight reduction or compression in margin in the second quarter. I don't know if I got everything there, was there a follow-on you wanted to ask you on the guidance?

David Konrad: No, no. That was perfect. And maybe the last one for me is just the fee income outlook as well with some of the changes there.

Jason Darby: Yes, fee income. We're actually quite happy about that. It's been gradually but noticeably growing. I think where we are throughout the rest of the year is going to be ratable to what we saw in the first quarter on a core basis with modest improvement, the GAAP number was a little bit higher because of the fact that we had nice ICS income, and we had a little bit of BOLI that was discrete benefit that we received. But overall, I think we're looking at just about $9.8 million to $10 million per quarter in fee interest income, and that will be evenly distributed across nice growth in Commercial Banking and continued acceleration of trust-related revenue as well.

Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Justin Crowley with Piper Sandler.

Justin Crowley: Just wanted to go back to the multifamily relationship that migrated in the quarter. Can you give a little more detail on what was so unique or isolated about the situation and with this borrower, and just what gets you to a point where you're feeling good about risk in the rest of the portfolio?

Priscilla Sims Brown: Justin, we're going to be somewhat limited, obviously, as we are in the midst of negotiations with this borrower on talking about it in too much detail, though, I'm sure you'd love to know more, you can understand where we are on that. I guess I'll just start by reiterating some of the points we've made, which is this reserve build and nonaccrual increase is driven by this one single borrower event primarily. And what happened was pretty clear. It was a notice of intent to default which occurred after the quarter, but before we closed the books. There was no broad portfolio weakness. The notice triggered an accounting requirement that moved additional previously performing loans into nonaccrual.

And then the borrower does have ties to DC Rapid Rehousing and Section 8 programs as well, but management really wants you to clearly understand that this was the borrower's behavior and financial condition is the driver, not the subsidy program itself. We review the exposure across Rapid Rehousing more broadly. We looked at exposure across the broader D.C. metro profile. And when I say that, I mean not just DC directly, but the states surrounding it. So we really, really looked carefully at that whole kind of metro area to see whether there were any other sort of similar characteristics.

We also, as you know, have provided quite a lot of detail on our New York portfolio in the past. That's still there. We looked at that real carefully. We looked at California, be it a smaller portfolio. We found very little, and we certainly see no -- we see limited migration just outside of this relationship in any of these other areas besides what we've disclosed. I would also just say that the reserves were established conservatively upfront to limit future P&L volatility. But we also want to retain flexibility to pursue an exit, an accelerated resolution, if that proves to be the right thing for preserving value for shareholders.

Sam and Jason, I don't know if there's anything you want to add to that?

Justin Crowley: Okay, this was -- I mean -- yes. I mean -- so this -- it wasn't specific to the Section 8 housing program. This was more borrower specific in terms of what has driven the weakness in the situation.

Priscilla Sims Brown: Rapid Rehousing and Section 8 are different. Section 8 is a federal program. Rapid Rehousing is a city program which is established to take people generally off the street and give them housing temporarily under a year. And that's what we looked at really carefully. We looked again at all of the Rapid Rehousing relationships we have. This borrower certainly had an overdependence on the program. But the issues here were specific to the borrower himself, his own behaviors and his own financial condition.

Justin Crowley: Okay. Got it. And then I guess, shifting gears a little. On political deposits, you saw the increase for the quarter, a little bit of a slowdown from last quarter, but still moving higher. Just wondering if you could provide some color on what you're seeing there and how you think that trends as we head into the midterms later this year?

Priscilla Sims Brown: Yes, Sam, I'll ask you to address that, but what I will say is, Justin, as you've observed and you've seen it in our deck, there's a general trend that continues to follow on each cycle, which is it builds over time, each trough is bigger than the trough before it. So they keep climbing the low points bigger than the low before and the high point is bigger than the high point before. And we don't see any indication that this will be different. And Sam, I don't know if you have any other...

Sam Brown: Yes. Justin, it's Sam. I would just add a couple of quick points. I think you're exactly right that we see these political deposits very much on track with prior trend. We're very pleased with our ability to have demonstrated all the way back to 2018, the predictability and the repeatable nature of how those deposits come in and out. And at $133 million, certainly excellent growth, that would also just point you to the really strong diversified growth across all of our segments that contributed to this.

Certainly, same political labor, nonprofit, all contributing over $100 million to our base, really smooths those ins and outs out and have contributed to quarter after quarter, how our great team has been able to continue to grow the book.

Priscilla Sims Brown: That's a great point, Sam, because it's been the trend for quite a while now. We really are seeing strength not only in additional deposits to existing clients, but also new clients across segments.

Justin Crowley: Okay. Got it. I appreciate that. And then just on loan growth. A lot of that once again coming from the multifamily side, is that like -- is that an area that you think continues to drive loan growth from here? What's the right way to think about that complexion as we get through the year?

Sam Brown: Yes. Great question, Justin. We're really pleased with the pipeline we've got ahead of us. Certainly, at 250% RBC, we still have a lot of availability under a concentration limit. The pipeline has a lot of -- there's plenty of exposure for market rate from strong mission-aligned subsidy programs like those benefit from 421a in New York, all with really tightly underwritten financial metrics, ratios and also, we've got a lot of addition of enhanced structural protections that reflect our elevated standards as we continue to grow the company. So I think you'll see strong growth, strong risk metrics, and we're going to continue to keep going and all the ways you would want to see us perform.

Jason Darby: Yes. So I'll just quickly add. I think the targets that we set out about 1.5% to 2% sequential loan growth in the net book, we're prepared to stay with those targets. We think they're very appropriate. Obviously, we're balancing between our grow more portfolios and those that are running off. So we'll expect to see a little bit higher growth rate just in the portfolios of C&I, multifamily and [indiscernible] versus the net book. And then we still have our PACE portfolio targets as well, Justin.

So you should think of those as complementary from a growth perspective on the asset side, and the opportunity for the bank to continue to have balance in loan generation is something that we are very focused on. So we did have a nice quarter with multifamily. We expect to see a little bit more balance between our C&I and multifamily portfolios as we move throughout the balance of the year to help meet those targets.

Justin Crowley: Okay. Great. And you mentioned on the PACE side as you continue to add to that portfolio. And I think in the past, you talked a lot about a lot of potential, specifically in the CPACE area. So -- and I think you have talked at length about the partnership that you're in. So just curious how you're thinking about growing that book as that business ramps higher?

Sam Brown: Yes. Justin, it's Sam again. CPACE has been really tremendous for us. You obviously saw a really nice number in the last quarter. You saw more growth this quarter. We really like the pace at which those assets are coming on, no pun intended. That announcement of that partnership with Electrify in October has been very strong. We're seeing a lot of contribution to the pipeline for that. And I think you're going to see this continue to be a strong component of how we're going to grow the asset base, and we're picking up some nice yield growth over the quarter as well.

Operator: We have no further questions at this time. Ms. Sims Brown, I'd like to turn the floor back over to you for closing comments.

Priscilla Sims Brown: Thank you, operator, and thank you all for listening in. As we step back and think about the quarter, we feel that it was a very strong quarter. We delivered solid execution across the franchise, which allowed us to favorably revise our guidance. We're building on a consistent pattern of quarterly outperformance. Our financial and capital position remains strong. Our balance sheet is built to withstand adverse scenarios and at the same time, we're well positioned for accelerated disciplined growth. And just as importantly, this quarter reinforces our risk discipline. When we identified an issue, we acted early, we acted conservatively.

We expanded the disclosure to you and we confirm that the impact is contained without losing momentum anywhere else in the business. That combination of performance, discipline and capital strength is exactly how we are positioning the bank for the long term. We thank you for your support, and we look forward to answering your questions after this call.

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.