Forget Former Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang -- This Is the Real Question Investors Need to Ask About Nvidia Stock

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Huang's resignation, which came after multiple alleged extramarital affairs, is going to be a big story for a while.

  • But for Nvidia investors, there is an even more important question, one about the company's customers.

  • Motley Fool Issues Rare "Total Conviction" Buy Alert ›

Jensen Huang, who co-founded Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) over three decades ago at a Denny's restaurant, is officially out as CEO of the artificial intelligence (AI) chip giant.

Multiple reports about multiple alleged extramarital affairs Huang had, one with a woman who may have been a Chinese spy and others with as many as two Nvidia employees, quickly led the torchbearer of AI to resign.

Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »

CFO Colette Kress has been named interim CEO. Nvidia stock has sunk over 28% in the past month.

While Huang is undoubtedly the most important CEO in AI, his departure is unlikely to slow down the sector, and Nvidia is likely to press on as the dominant chip player. But that doesn't mean Nvidia is in the clear. Forget Huang -- this is the real question investors need to ask about Nvidia stock.

Presenter in black leather jacket holding up a dual-fan graphics card on stage with colorful tech backdrop

Jensen Huang. Image source: Nvidia.

Has Nvidia's revenue included illegal chip sales to China all along?

There's no denying Huang's importance to Nvidia -- his leadership may have even commanded a premium for the stock.

But at the end of the day, Nvidia will still have the same graphics processing units (GPUs) that have significantly outperformed their competition. I guess one could argue that future innovation might not be as secure as it was, but I don't think anyone can say that definitively.

Nvidia has maintained a moat since 2006 through its CUDA programming platform, on which most software developers have been trained, which makes switching to a new system difficult. That advantage won't go away.

When it comes to the stock and the financials driving it, the real question investors need to ask concerns Nvidia's relationship with the Singaporean data center Megaspeed, which reportedly led to illegal chip sales. The alleged Chinese spy with whom Huang reportedly had an affair, Alice Huang (no relation to Jensen), was a top executive at Megaspeed.

Tech news site The Information reported this week that over $7 billion of chip sales from Nvidia to Megaspeed eventually made their way to China illegally.

Nvidia has not been able to sell chips to China since April 2025, when the U.S. government said it would require the company to obtain an export license. Since then, Chinese sales have been virtually zero, according to the company. Nvidia and Huang have lobbied President Donald Trump's administration to restart sales in the region. But even before then, Nvidia could sell only older-generation chips due to national security concerns.

What investors are likely wondering is whether Nvidia's relationship with Megaspeed is a one-off, or whether more of Nvidia's previous revenue has derived from similar relationships.

Interestingly, the independent short-seller Culper Research went short Nvidia in May of this year, betting that more of Nvidia's sales have a similar dynamic.

"We believe that in reality, over 20% of Nvidia's FY 2026 compute revenues remained driven by China via illegal GPU diversion and Southeast Asian intermediaries," Culper wrote on X in May.

More incredibly, Culper specifically called out Megaspeed and said it had uncovered documents showing the company had been financed by the Chinese tech giant Alibaba through a Singaporean shell company.

There are real financial implications, if true

If Culper's thesis, which looks a lot more plausible now, is true, that could mean real trouble for Nvidia's revenue and earnings.

While it looked like Nvidia was about to sell chips to China again in the near future, this whole matter could prompt the Trump administration to revisit export restrictions and potentially make them even stricter. Nvidia may also face tougher standards when selling chips abroad to prove they are not being illegally diverted. This could prove costly.

Now, it's also possible that Culper is wrong and the chip giant is still allowed to resume sales of chips to Chinese companies.

Ultimately, while Huang is the big headline, the bigger questions are whether a material amount of Nvidia's current and prior chip sales is being illegally diverted to China and whether Nvidia can resume sales to Chinese companies in the future.

Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?

Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $335,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,000,640!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 823% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of November 15, 2026.

Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Alibaba Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - November 11, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Nov 11, Wed
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Nvidia slid 7.7% after hours while AMD and Broadcom rose — the AI trade changed hands, it didn't breakNvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 12, Thu
Nvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
placeholder
Gold hit a one-year low while central banks bought 321 tonnes — the sellers were never the ones you thinkSpot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 13, Fri
Spot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
placeholder
Brent rose 3.3% and US crude stocks built 4.66 million barrels in the same weekBrent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 13, Fri
Brent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
placeholder
Ethereum Drops Below $2,000 After Plunging Over 20% in a Month as Odds of $1,500 Retest SurgeEthereum Plunges Over 20% in a Month, Risking a Retest of $1,500 After Losing the $2,000 Defense Line.On November 13, Ethereum (ETH) plunged more than 5%, officially falling below the key
Author  TradingKey
Nov 13, Fri
Ethereum Plunges Over 20% in a Month, Risking a Retest of $1,500 After Losing the $2,000 Defense Line.On November 13, Ethereum (ETH) plunged more than 5%, officially falling below the key
goTop
quote