Better Dividend ETF: iShares HDV's High Yields vs. ProShares NOBL's Dividend Growth

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • The iShares Core High Dividend ETF has a significantly lower expense ratio and higher trailing-12-month dividend yield than the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

  • The ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF focuses on companies with three decades of dividend growth, while the iShares Core High Dividend ETF prioritizes high current yields.

  • The iShares Core High Dividend ETF has outperformed on a 1-year total return basis and shows a lower historical max drawdown over the last five years.

  • Motley Fool Issues Rare "Total Conviction" Buy Alert ›

The iShares Core High Dividend ETF (NYSEMKT:HDV) offers a higher yield and lower expense ratio than the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NYSEMKT:NOBL), which prioritizes consistent dividend growth over at least 25 consecutive years.

While both funds target dividend-paying equities, they approach the income space from opposite ends of the strategy spectrum. The ProShares fund focuses on the stability of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats, whereas the iShares fund seeks out established companies with particularly high distributions today. This comparison looks at how these differing philosophies impact sector tilts, expense ratios, and historical risk-adjusted returns.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricNOBLHDV
IssuerProSharesiShares
Share price$58.32 (as of 2026-10-23)$30.42 (as of 2026-10-23)
Expense ratio0.35%0.08%
1-yr return (as of 2026-10-23)7.28%17.86%
Dividend yield2.0%3.2%
Beta0.730.52
AUM$11.9 billion$16.3 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

The iShares fund is significantly more affordable for long-term holders, with an expense ratio of 0.08% compared to 0.35% for the ProShares fund. Additionally, for those prioritizing current cash flow, the iShares fund offers a notably higher payout, carrying a trailing-12-month dividend yield of 3.2%.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricNOBLHDV
Max drawdown (5 yr)(-17.9%)(-15.4%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$1,389$1,863

What's inside

The iShares Core High Dividend ETF concentrates its portfolio in sectors known for robust cash flows, with exposure leaning heavily toward Consumer Staples at 27%, Energy at 25%, and Health Care at 13%. With 74 holdings, its largest positions include ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) at 9.59%, Chevron (NYSE:CVX) at 7.34%, and Abbvie (NYSE:ABBV) at 6.72%. The iShares fund was launched in 2011, and has paid $0.96 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$30.42 share price works out to a 3.2% yield.

The ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF follows a stricter quality screen, tracking an index that requires companies to have at least 25 consecutive years of dividend increases. It holds 71 stocks, primarily in Consumer Defensive at 23%, Industrials at 20%, and Financial Services at 13%. Its largest positions include Factset Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) at 1.89%, Roper Technologies (NASDAQ:ROP) at 1.82%, and Becton Dickinson and Co (NYSE:BDX) at 1.81%. It was launched in 2013, and has paid $1.17 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$58.32 share price works out to a 2% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

Generating passive income through dividend stocks is a key means for growing your wealth. The iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) offer two distinct ways to capitalize on this. Personally, I think HDV looks like the better fund, although some investors may prefer NOBL for the stability offered by long-term S&P 500 dividend payers.

HDV is my pick for many reasons. Its one-year return is far superior to NOBL's, but that's because its top holdings include oil companies that benefited from soaring fuel prices as a result of the conflict in the Middle East.

The larger factors in HDV's favor are its low expense ratio, which helps you keep more money in your pocket over time, and a robust dividend yield. The fund leans heavily toward high-cash-flow sectors like Energy and Consumer Staples, providing strong current income, although it must frequently rebalance its portfolio as a result of its screening rules.

NOBL's focus on companies that have consistently paid dividends for at least 25 years makes it arguably the higher-quality ETF. The fund uses an equal-weight approach, keeping any one company from overly impacting performance. These strengths are offset by a high expense ratio and lower dividend yield.

Should you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares Core High Dividend ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares Core High Dividend ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and iShares Trust - iShares Core High Dividend ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $334,793!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,257,420!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 874% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 31, 2026.

Robert Izquierdo has positions in FactSet Research Systems. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AbbVie, Chevron, FactSet Research Systems, and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Roper Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Anthropic files for a $2 trillion IPO — the $80.7 billion loss is the decoy, the $450 billion compute bill is the riskAnthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
placeholder
Brent's $115 front month sits $4.6 above January — the $14 spread to WTI is the supply-risk premiumDecember Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 28, Wed
December Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 29, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Oct 29, Thu
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 30, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Oct 30, Fri
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
US GDP grew 3.4% and core PCE held at 3.1% — December is now a hike trade, not a cut tradeUS Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 30, Fri
US Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
goTop
quote