Schwab International Equity ETF vs. Vanguard Total International Stock ETF: Two Low-Cost International ETFs, but One Offers More Growth Potential for the Next Decade

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Schwab International Equity ETF offers developed-market exposure with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with Vanguard's 0.05%.

  • Vanguard Total International Stock ETF provides broader diversification by including emerging markets in its portfolio of over 8,600 stocks.

  • Schwab offers a higher 3.1% dividend yield versus Vanguard's 2.4%, while Vanguard has greater exposure to technology and Asian growth markets.

  • Motley Fool Issues Rare "Total Conviction" Buy Alert ›

Schwab International Equity ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHF) focuses on developed international markets with a ultra-low expense ratio, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (NASDAQ:VXUS) provides broader exposure including emerging markets.

For investors seeking to diversify away from U.S. concentration, both the Vanguard and Schwab funds represent efficient, low-cost options. However, the choice between them often hinges on whether one wants exposure to the higher growth potential of emerging markets or prefers the relative stability of developed economies alone. This comparison examines how these geographic tilts impact performance and portfolio construction.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVXUSSCHF
IssuerVanguardSchwab
Share price$82.53 (as of 2026-10-23)$26.79 (as of 2026-10-23)
Expense ratio0.05%0.03%
1-yr return (as of 2026-10-23)13.3%16.6%
Dividend yield2.4%3.1%
Beta0.790.84
AUM$163.2 billion$67.9 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

The Schwab fund is the more affordable option with a 0.03% expense ratio, slightly undercutting the 0.05% fee of the Vanguard fund. While both maintain low costs by industry standards, investors focused on maximizing income may also notice that the Schwab fund provides a higher trailing distribution yield.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVXUSSCHF
Max drawdown (5 yr)(28.8%)(28.8%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$1,469$1,561

What's inside

The Schwab International Equity ETF focuses exclusively on developed markets. By tracking the FTSE Developed ex-US Index, it provides concentrated exposure to established international markets. Its portfolio weights are targeted with Financials at 25%, Industrials at 17.5%, and Information Technology at 16%. With around 1,400 holdings, its largest positions include Samsung Electronics (KOSE:A005930) at 3.12%, SK Hynix (NASDAQ: SKHY) at 2.57%, and ASML Holding (NASDAQ:ASML) at 2.39%. The fund launched in 2009 and has paid $0.84 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$26.8 share price works out to a 3.1% yield.

The Vanguard Total International Stock ETF has its focus on emerging markets, resulting in a much larger portfolio of roughly 8,600 holdings. The inclusion of smaller cap stocks and emerging regions offers a more exhaustive representation of the non-U.S. equity universe. It concentrates in Financials at 23%, Technology at 19%, and Industrials at 15%. Top positions include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE:TSM) at 4.3%, Samsung Electronics (OTC:SSNLF) at 2.3%, and SK Hynix at 1.7%. The fund launched in 2011 and has paid $1.98 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$82.5 share price works out to a 2.4% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

This is a close one, but if I had to hold one of these ETFs for the next decade, I would choose the Vanguard Total International Stock ETF. Both funds have meaningful exposure to the artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout, but through somewhat different investments. Schwab holds established semiconductor leaders like Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and ASML, which supply memory chips and advanced manufacturing equipment critical to AI development.

Vanguard owns these same companies but adds Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, a leading producer of advanced AI chips. This gives Vanguard exposure to another critical part of the semiconductor supply chain rather than an entirely different investment theme.

The more important distinction is geographic diversification. Schwab focuses on developed markets, providing exposure to established economies alongside a higher dividend yield and slightly lower expenses. Vanguard extends into emerging markets, such as China and India, offering access to additional long-term growth opportunities. This broader reach into emerging markets brings greater risks but, for investors building an international portfolio over the next decade, Vanguard looks like the better buy.

Should you buy stock in Schwab International Equity ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Schwab International Equity ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Schwab International Equity ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $334,631!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,312,844!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 893% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 31, 2026.

RJ Fulton has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Anthropic files for a $2 trillion IPO — the $80.7 billion loss is the decoy, the $450 billion compute bill is the riskAnthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
placeholder
Brent's $115 front month sits $4.6 above January — the $14 spread to WTI is the supply-risk premiumDecember Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 28, Wed
December Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 29, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Oct 29, Thu
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 29, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 30, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Oct 30, Fri
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 30, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
US GDP grew 3.4% and core PCE held at 3.1% — December is now a hike trade, not a cut tradeUS Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 30, Fri
US Q3 GDP rose 3.4%, above the 3.1% estimate, while September headline PCE hit 3.6% and core held at 3.1%. December hike odds are near 90%; inventories, AI capex and energy explain why.
goTop
quote