Geopolitics, stagflation, slowing growth, and a cooling labor market are all factors raising the risk of a recession.
The 2008 and 2020 recessions offer some clues as to which areas of the market might do better or worse.
Let's take a look at the numbers for multiple asset classes during past recessions to see what we can learn.
While the U.S. economy still appears to be in relatively good shape overall, a number of factors are making investors nervous. Labor market growth has slowed significantly over the past year. Consumer credit stress is on the rise.
But the biggest catalyst, of course, is the war in Iran. The month-long conflict in the Middle East has already caused crude oil prices to nearly double. Inflation rates are expected to begin moving sharply higher again, and it's taking away the Fed's ability to lower rates to add support to the economy. That has a lot of folks fearful that a recession might not be far off.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
So what might a recession do to the financial markets in 2026? It's been 17 years since the end of the housing crisis. The only recession since then happened during the COVID-19 pandemic's height. It would be safer to call that an anomaly than a garden variety economic downturn.
But that doesn't mean we can't learn a thing or two from the past. Let's break down those recessions to see how various themes performed and what we could expect today.
Image source: Getty Images.
In order to take a look back at these prior recessions, I'm going to evaluate the performance of five different popular ETFs.
(Note: I used the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF in this example instead of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) as the latter didn't launch until 2010 and wasn't available to use to demonstrate performance during the financial crisis.)
Much like the tech bubble did the most damage to technology stocks, the 2008 financial crisis did the most damage to banks, lenders, and other similar institutions. That made this bear market a little unusual in that it wasn't the riskier, growth-oriented stocks that underperformed. It was value, where most financials get categorized, that was the big laggard.
| ETF | Focus | Max drawdown (2007-2009) | Std dev of daily returns (2007-2009) | Beta (2007-2009) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | S&P 500 | -55.2% | 1.88% | 0.995 |
| VIG | Dividend growth | -46.8% | 1.58% | 0.816 |
| VYM | High yield | -57% | 1.82% | 0.992 |
| VUG | Growth | -50.7% | 1.72% | 0.975 |
| VTV | Value | -59.3% | 1.99% | 1.041 |
Data sources: YCharts.
Dividend growth stocks held up much better than the broader market and experienced significantly less risk in the process. A lot of the bigger banks were paying above-average yields, so it's not surprising to see high yielders doing comparatively poorly.
This probably isn't a good proxy for 2026, given that we don't have any one particular area or market sector that looks especially vulnerable. It could ultimately be tech, but valuations don't look nearly as out of whack as they did 25 years ago. Plus, given the outperformance we've seen from tech and growth over the past few years, it would seem much likelier that those groups would underperform, as is traditionally the case in a bear market.
This was more of a market shock that saw everything sell off pretty immediately and sharply.
| ETF | Focus | Max drawdown (2020) | Std dev of daily returns (2020) | Beta (2020) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | S&P 500 | -33.7% | 2.10% | 0.992 |
| VIG | Dividend growth | -31.7% | 2.01% | 0.819 |
| VYM | High yield | -35.2% | 2.15% | 0.951 |
| VUG | Growth | -31.8% | 2.22% | 1.018 |
| VTV | Value | -36.8% | 2.22% | 1.005 |
Data sources: YCharts.
Of the major themes, growth held up better than value, but there wasn't a big performance disparity. Losses came pretty much across the board. Dividend growth as a more defensive strategy again outperformed and did so with much less volatility, although the whipsaws of the 2020 market were much more dramatic than those of 2008.
Here are a few things that I believe could happen:
Mark Twain said: "History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes." Both the 2008 and 2020 recessions were unique, but they do provide important hints at how things could play out in a bear market today.
Before you buy stock in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 13, 2026.
David Dierking has positions in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, Vanguard Growth ETF, Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF, and Vanguard Value ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.