Is Nvidia Worth This Much Less Without Jensen Huang?

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Jensen Huang led Nvidia to new heights, but the company can survive without him.

  • The market is losing sight of how dominant Nvidia's business is.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›

Last Sunday, Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) co-founder and then-CEO Jensen Huang admitted to having an extramarital affair with someone who is an alleged Chinese spy. In the following days, The New York Times reported that Huang also had an affair with a direct report. On Thursday, Nvidia announced Huang’s resignation.

At its peak, Nvidia had a market cap of $5.8 trillion. At market close on Friday, the stock had a market cap of $3.93 trillion. The stock is down 13% over the past week and 6% since Wednesday’s market close.

Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »

So, investors think Nvidia is worth less without Huang in the corner office. Are they right?

Presenter in black leather jacket holding up a dual-fan graphics card on stage with colorful tech backdrop

Jensen Huang. Image source: Nvidia.

From a tech standpoint, Huang has been a leader

There's no doubting the impact that Jensen Huang had on Nvidia's technical abilities. He steered the company to develop cutting-edge products in the GPU realm, along with other products to support them. Nvidia's technology is best-in-class, and with Huang stepping down from the CEO role, that fact likely won't change.

Furthermore, while Huang is unique, there are likely a handful of people within the Nvidia organization that could take over and do a great job.

The best company at leadership transitions has been Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), as it has gone through several transitions and sustained its dominance every time. While Nvidia's situation may be a bit more tumultuous than anything Apple has dealt with, Nvidia can survive.

So, investors need to make a decision about Nvidia stock. Is the only reason you invested in it because of Jensen Huang? Or is it because of Nvidia's leading technology and position within the massive AI build-out?

For me, I invested in Nvidia because of its products and positioning, although having Huang at the helm was a nice touch. The core of my Nvidia investment thesis is still intact, and even though my position is dipping due to the news breaking this week and investors panic-selling, I'm still holding course because the business will likely be just fine.

Nvidia has high visibility into next year's revenue

During last quarter's conference call, Nvidia gave guidance for 70% revenue growth in 2027. Normally, companies don't issue guidance six months in advance, but it's likely that Nvidia has pretty much all of the orders it expects to receive locked in for 2027. It's extremely unlikely that companies will start to cancel orders because of Huang's actions or resignation, so investors should be able to count on that projection.

Furthermore, the product development pipeline is already set for many years in advance. So, what's coming out is already influenced by Huang's fantastic technical mind.

Even though losing Jensen Huang will hurt Nvidia, I think the business is still a great one and in a fantastic position to deliver incredible returns going forward. Just look at how cheap Nvidia's stock has gotten due to the sell-off.

NVDA PE Ratio (Forward 1y) Chart

NVDA PE Ratio (Forward 1y) data by YCharts

Nvidia trades at about 10 times next year's earnings estimates, which is an incredibly cheap price tag for any stock, let alone one of the world's most dominant companies.

While it may take a few months for the storm surrounding Huang to subside, the market will eventually get back to valuing Nvidia's business for what it is, and the stock could provide major upside as a result. I'm not selling my Nvidia shares right now, and I don't think most investors should, either.

Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now?

Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $338,083!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,021,163!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 830% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of November 14, 2026.

Keithen Drury has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - November 11, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Nov 11, Wed
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Nvidia slid 7.7% after hours while AMD and Broadcom rose — the AI trade changed hands, it didn't breakNvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 12, Thu
Nvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
placeholder
US October PPI Preview: Fed Rate Hike Expectations Rise, PPI May Be Key Variable; How Will US Stocks, Dollar, and Gold Move?On Friday (Nov. 13) Eastern Time, the U.S. will release the October Producer Price Index (PPI). Following the October CPI once again exceeding expectations, the market will look to the PP
Author  TradingKey
Nov 12, Thu
On Friday (Nov. 13) Eastern Time, the U.S. will release the October Producer Price Index (PPI). Following the October CPI once again exceeding expectations, the market will look to the PP
placeholder
Gold hit a one-year low while central banks bought 321 tonnes — the sellers were never the ones you thinkSpot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 02: 40
Spot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
placeholder
Brent rose 3.3% and US crude stocks built 4.66 million barrels in the same weekBrent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 03: 06
Brent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
goTop
quote