NAB's 13% profit fall was mostly accounting — the bad-debt line wasn't

Mitrade Insights — Three numbers explain National Australia Bank's full-year result, and only one of them is about credit. Cash earnings fell 13% to A$6.1bn, roughly 4% below Macquarie's forecast. An A$1.3bn software amortisation charge sits inside that figure — a non-cash accounting item. Strip it out and earnings were flat at A$7.1bn, with the final dividend held at A$1.70.
The shares did not read it that way. NAB fell as much as 7.9% to A$37.91 and was trading 6.19% lower at A$38.62 in afternoon Sydney trade, against a prior close of A$41.17.

* Chart source: TradingView (ASX: NAB, daily)
Two things stand out on the chart. The gap from A$41.17 leaves the whole October rally stranded above the current price, and the RSI is at 42.22 — well above the 30 line. This is not an oversold bounce setup; momentum has room to keep falling before it looks stretched.
What the 13% actually contains
| Line | FY2026 | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Cash earnings (reported) | A$6.1bn | −13% year on year, ~4% below the Macquarie forecast |
| Software amortisation charge | A$1.3bn | Non-cash; hits the reported number, not cash flow |
| Cash earnings ex-charge | A$7.1bn | Flat year on year |
| Final dividend | A$1.70 per share | Held, not cut |
| Bad debt charges | Sharply higher | Flagged in the result as the credit line deteriorated |
The distinction between a non-cash charge and a bad-debt charge is the difference between a bookkeeping decision and a statement about the economy. Amortisation is a schedule. Bad debts are borrowers who cannot pay, and they arrive on the P&L long after the cash rate has already moved.
The rest of the Big Four did not follow
Westpac fell around 2.4% and ANZ about 2.0%. Commonwealth Bank was roughly flat. If this were a sector-wide credit event, all four would have repriced together. The market instead singled out NAB's book — which is the correct response when one bank reports a deteriorating credit line before the others have reported theirs.
The strongest case against the accounting defence
Even after removing the A$1.3bn charge, earnings were flat, not higher — in a year when the cash rate sat at 4.85%, an 18-year high. A bank holding rates that high should be earning more on its deposit base. Flat ex-charge earnings is therefore not a clean result being misread; it is a result where the clean number already shows no growth.
What would make the 13% matter
One-off case. The amortisation schedule is a reclassification, ex-charge earnings held, the dividend held at A$1.70, and the bad-debt commentary is backward-looking. In that world the shares should reclaim A$41.17 within a few sessions, and the September-October floor of A$37.29 is never tested.
Cycle case. The bad-debt line is the leading indicator, not the trailing one. Cash rate at 4.85% with employment softening means arrears keep building for another two quarters. Westpac and ANZ report similar language at their own updates, and the market stops pricing NAB alone — the whole sector de-rates, and A$37.29 becomes the level that decides whether this is a de-rating or a trend.
The two cases are separated by one disclosure: the size and composition of the bad-debt charge. Until that is quantified, the ex-charge A$7.1bn is the number the bulls need to defend, and A$41.17 is the print that tells you which case the market has picked.
Read more
Before making any trading decisions, it is important to equip yourself with sufficient fundamental knowledge, have a comprehensive understanding of market trends, be aware of risks and hidden costs, carefully consider investment targets, level of experience, risk appetite, and seek professional advice if necessary.
Furthermore, the content of this article is solely the author's personal opinion and does not necessarily constitute investment advice. The content of this article is for reference purposes only, and readers should not use this article as a basis for any investment decisions.
Investors should not rely on this information as a substitute for independent judgment or make decisions solely based on this information. It does not constitute any trading activity and does not guarantee any profits in trading.
If you have any inquiries regarding the data, information, or content related to Mitrade in this article, please contact us via email: insights@mitrade.com. The Mitrade team will carefully review the content to continue improving the quality of the article.




