SCHD vs NOBL: Which ETF is the Best Buy for Your Dividend Goals?

Source Motley_fool

Key Points

  • SCHD charges a much lower fee and delivers a higher dividend yield than NOBL.

  • NOBL tilts more toward consumer defensive and industrials, while SCHD leans heavily on energy and healthcare.

  • While one ETF focuses on yield, the other is oriented towards dividend growth

  • 10 stocks we like better than ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF ›

Both the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHD) and the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NYSEMKT:NOBL) target dividend-focused U.S. equities, but SCHD stands out for its lower cost and higher yield, while NOBL offers a more diversified sector mix.

The ETFs take distinct approaches: SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, whereas NOBL invests at least 80% of its total assets in component securities of its index, with a minimum of 40 equally weighted stocks and no single sector comprising more than 30% of index weight.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricSCHDNOBL
IssuerSchwabProShares
Expense ratio0.06%0.35%
1-yr total return (as of 2026-03-21)13.8%5.7%
Dividend yield3.5%2%
Beta0.650.76
AUM$98.2 billion$10.9 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

SCHD comes in as the more affordable option, charging just 0.06% annually versus NOBL’s 0.35%. SCHD also delivers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to income-focused investors looking for a stronger payout.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricSCHDNOBL
Max drawdown (5 y)-16.82%-17.91%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,267$1,229

What's inside

NOBL holds around 70 stocks, with no single sector allowed to exceed 30% of the portfolio. The fund’s largest sector exposures are industrials (22.5%), consumer defensive (22.09%), and financial services (13.08%). Top holdings as of March 20 include Chevron (NYSE:CVX), ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM), and Linde (NASDAQ:LIN), each making up less than 2% of assets. The fund has a 12.4-year track record. This equally weighted approach aims to reduce concentration risk and maintain broad exposure to established dividend growers.

In contrast, SCHD holds 101 names, leaning more heavily on energy (19.88%), consumer defensive (18.5%), and healthcare (16.2%). Its largest positions are ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), Lockheed Martin Corp (NYSE:LMT), and Chevron, each at around 4.8%–5% of assets, creating a more top-heavy profile. Both funds avoid leverage, currency hedging, and other structural quirks.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF offers a much higher dividend yield than the ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF. That’s because SCHD is yield-oriented, investing in stocks offering high yields. However, the fund’s underlying index, the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100™ Index, ensures that its companies have a strong dividend track record and selects its constituents using financial ratios. That means only high-quality companies make it to the ETF.

NOBL Chart

NOBL data by YCharts

NOBL, on the other hand, focuses on dividend growth instead of yields, investing only in Dividend Aristocrats®. The term Dividend Aristocrats® is a registered trademark of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of the S&P 500 Global (NYSE:SPGI). It is an elite group of S&P 500 companies that have raised their dividends for at least 25 consecutive years. These are established companies in their respective industries with strong financials that can support regular, growing dividends.

The combination of a higher yield with significantly lower fees (expense ratio) makes SCHD a superior dividend ETF to own. NOBL, however, is a better fit for investors seeking dividend stability, as its constituents have a long track record of dividend raises.

Should you buy stock in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $495,179!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,058,743!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 898% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 23, 2026.

Neha Chamaria has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron, ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF, and S&P Global. The Motley Fool recommends ConocoPhillips, Linde, and Lockheed Martin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Trump’s 48-Hour Ultimatum to Iran Just Sent Markets Into Monday With No Exit PlanUS stock futures fell at Sunday’s open after President Trump gave Iran 48 hours to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz, threatening to “hit and obliterate” the country’s power plants starting with the l
Author  Beincrypto
4 hours ago
US stock futures fell at Sunday’s open after President Trump gave Iran 48 hours to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz, threatening to “hit and obliterate” the country’s power plants starting with the l
placeholder
Is Every Bank Launching a Stablecoin Quietly Building the Case for XRP?XRP (XRP) fell 3.74% to $1.39 on March 22, trading 62% below its July 2025 all-time high of $3.65, as open interest collapsed 75% from its peak and leveraged positions continued to unwind.The price de
Author  Beincrypto
4 hours ago
XRP (XRP) fell 3.74% to $1.39 on March 22, trading 62% below its July 2025 all-time high of $3.65, as open interest collapsed 75% from its peak and leveraged positions continued to unwind.The price de
placeholder
Will TRUMP Holders $70 Million Flash Selling Push Price To Historic Lows?Official Trump (TRUMP) price is trading at $3.21, down 1.32% on the day, after surrendering nearly all of a 49.65% rally that peaked on March 13.The token now sits 3.2% above its all-time low of $2.70
Author  Beincrypto
4 hours ago
Official Trump (TRUMP) price is trading at $3.21, down 1.32% on the day, after surrendering nearly all of a 49.65% rally that peaked on March 13.The token now sits 3.2% above its all-time low of $2.70
placeholder
Gold Just Had Its Worst Week Since 1983: Here’s Where Smart Money May Go NextGold’s sharpest weekly decline in over four decades is rattling global markets and forcing a rethink of what constitutes a “safe haven” in today’s macro environment.The precious metal, long viewed as
Author  Beincrypto
4 hours ago
Gold’s sharpest weekly decline in over four decades is rattling global markets and forcing a rethink of what constitutes a “safe haven” in today’s macro environment.The precious metal, long viewed as
placeholder
Iran responds forcefully to Trump's latest threats targeting Iran’s power plantsIran answered President Donald Trump’s 48-hour warning to hit Iran’s power plants if Tehran did not open the Strait of Hormuz within two days. Iran’s military answered by saying any U.S. strike on non-military energy sites would trigger attacks in return. That put the focus back on the waterway that carries a huge share of […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
4 hours ago
Iran answered President Donald Trump’s 48-hour warning to hit Iran’s power plants if Tehran did not open the Strait of Hormuz within two days. Iran’s military answered by saying any U.S. strike on non-military energy sites would trigger attacks in return. That put the focus back on the waterway that carries a huge share of […]
goTop
quote