Michael Burry Says SpaceX Isn't Worth $1 Trillion. Its AI Business Could Prove Him Wrong.

Before Space Exploration Technologies (NASDAQ: SPCX) went public in the largest debut in history at $1.8 trillion, Michael Burry of "The Big Short" fame argued that nothing in its IPO filing justified even a $1 trillion valuation.

Weeks later, he called the company a combination of a small space business, a niche telecom business, a struggling social media platform, and "CoreWeave-light," referring to the heavily indebted but fast-growing neocloud operator.

Burry's message was clear: SpaceX's businesses didn't come close to supporting its valuation.

New contracts start to change the math

Since Burry made those comments, SpaceX has produced some compelling evidence that its AI business may become more than he anticipated. After signing a string of major contracts, the division is looking less like "CoreWeave-light" and more like "Amazon Web Services-light."

Anthropic agreed to pay SpaceX $1.25 billion per month for computing power, while Alphabet's Google signed a deal worth $920 million monthly. Agreements with Reflection AI and a still-unidentified customer add another $150 million and $1.11 billion per month, respectively. Once all these customers are fully served, these contracts will bring in $3.4 billion per month -- or $40.8 billion annually.

Image source: Getty Images.

Those contracts make SpaceXAI look more like a serious player in AI compute with major customers and major deals.

But the risks Burry flagged still stand

Still, I wouldn't dismiss Burry's comments.

SpaceX spent a whopping $15.8 billion on AI infrastructure during the second quarter alone, and the division remains unprofitable. And while the deals bring into focus a path to profitability and financial viability, their enormous headline values aren't a guarantee of seeing a long-term return on investment. The contracts contain unusually short termination provisions for leases -- 90 days -- that give its customers a relatively easy out if they can find compute elsewhere -- or find they need less of it.

Burry's larger argument around AI is that the technology will eventually become commoditized -- I tend to agree. In that future, compute providers may operate closer to a utility company than to a tech company: high, ongoing costs, intense competition, and lower margins.

The incredible demand for AI compute is creating a mad dash to build as much capacity as possible. It's more than possible that this leads to an overbuild, and the current dynamic of demand outpacing supply reverses.

SpaceX has a lot to live up to

So while SpaceX's new contracts vastly improve the economics of its AI division in the short term, I'm not sure Burry will be proven wrong in the long run. To justify its enormous valuation, SpaceX's AI efforts need to not just show incredible top-line growth but also prove to be seriously profitable.

And that's before we get to its space launch business and Starlink, both of which also need to be wildly successful to justify SpaceX's current $2 trillion price tag.

Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Amazon. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.