Identical Tech Exposure, Lower Cost or Greater Liquidity? VGT vs. FTEC

Source Motley_fool

Key Points

  • FTEC matches VGT on sector and top holdings, but charges a slightly lower expense ratio

  • Both ETFs delivered nearly identical 1-year and 5-year returns, with minimal differences in risk and drawdown

  • VGT boasts much larger assets under management and greater trading liquidity compared to FTEC

  • 10 stocks we like better than Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Information Technology Index ETF ›

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (NYSEMKT:VGT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (NYSEMKT:FTEC) both target U.S. technology stocks with similar sector allocations and top holdings, but VGT commands far greater assets under management and higher daily trading volume, while FTEC edges out with a marginally lower expense ratio.

Both VGT and FTEC are passively managed funds focused on the U.S. information technology sector, offering exposure to major players like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. This comparison looks at their costs, performance, risk, and portfolio details to help investors assess which may better fit their needs.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVGTFTEC
IssuerVanguardFidelity
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
1-yr return (as of 2026-03-24)23.7%24.1%
Dividend yield0.42%0.44%
Beta1.321.31
AUM$126.5 billion$15.96 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

FTEC is slightly more affordable, charging a 0.08% expense ratio versus VGT’s 0.09%, but VGT delivers a marginally higher dividend yield at 0.5% compared to FTEC’s 0.4%.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVGTFTEC
Max drawdown (5 y)-35.07%-34.95%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,035$2,057

What's inside

FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, holding 294 stocks across the technology sector. Its largest positions are Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA) at 18.25%, Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) at 15.41%, and Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT) at 10.07%. The fund launched in October 2013 and, like VGT, is nearly 98% weighted to technology, with small allocations to industrials and financial services. There are no leverage, currency hedging, or ESG quirks.

VGT is similarly concentrated: 98% in technology, with top holdings in NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL), and Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), though it owns slightly more companies at 310. Both funds provide broad, cap-weighted exposure to U.S. tech giants, with minimal sector or holdings differences.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

When two ETFs hold nearly identical technology stocks in similar weights ,the real difference is how they are managed, not what they invest in. That is the case with the Vanguard Information Technology ETF and the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

Both funds are dominated by the same group of mega-cap companies, with Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft accounting for a substantial portion of returns. Their broader holdings are also closely aligned, which keeps performance differences minimal over time. The main distinctions are cost and scale. FTEC charges a slightly lower fee, while VGT’s larger size and heavier trading volume can support tighter spreads and smoother execution.

For investors, the choice is less about different technology exposure, but about finding the most efficient way to invest in it. A lower expense ratio can benefit long-term holders, while greater liquidity may matter more for larger positions or frequent trading. In practice, both funds deliver nearly the same portfolio, so the decision comes down to whether cost or trading efficiency carries more weight for you.

Should you buy stock in Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Information Technology Index ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Information Technology Index ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Msci Information Technology Index ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $497,659!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,095,404!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 912% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 26, 2026.

Eric Trie has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia and is short shares of Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Aave pushes DeFi expansion as V4 targets ‘inefficienceies of idle liquidity’Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
16 hours ago
Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
placeholder
Ripple CTO flags what’s behind XRP fee jumpsRipple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
16 hours ago
Ripple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
placeholder
Solana’s Golden Cross Faces a 16% Supply Exit That Could Derail the RallySolana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
Author  Beincrypto
16 hours ago
Solana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
placeholder
Bittensor (TAO) Breaks Out Toward $600, but an 80% Long Bias Stands in the WayBittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
Author  Beincrypto
16 hours ago
Bittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
placeholder
Gold’s 21% Fall Forms 106 Year Record While Bitcoin Stabilizes At $71,000Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
Author  Beincrypto
16 hours ago
Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
goTop
quote