Better Clean Energy ETF: VanEck's Nuclear-Focused NLR vs. the iShares ICLN Targeting Renewables

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF focuses on a concentrated 29-holding portfolio of nuclear energy companies.

  • The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is more affordable with an expense ratio of 0.38% compared to 0.52% for the VanEck fund.

  • The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF outperformed over the last year with an 11.0% total return, compared to a 21.8% loss for the VanEck fund.

  • 10 stocks we like better than VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Uranium And Nuclear ETF ›

The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NYSEMKT:NLR) offers targeted exposure to the nuclear power chain with a higher yield, while the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (NASDAQ:ICLN) provides lower-cost, broad diversification across renewable electricity and equipment.

Energy investors often choose between different paths toward global decarbonization. While some prefer the growth potential of solar and wind, others look to the steady, carbon-free baseload power provided by nuclear energy. Comparing these two funds reveals significant differences in their portfolio concentration, expense structures, and historical risk profiles, providing a clearer view of how each might fit into a long-term investment strategy.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricICLNNLR
IssueriSharesVanEck
Share price$17.28 (as of 2026-10-09)$103.35 (as of 2026-10-09)
Expense ratio0.38%0.52%
1-yr return (as of 2026-10-09)11.0%(21.8%)
Dividend yield1.1%3.1%
Beta1.41.5
AUM$2.2 billion$3.5 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

The iShares fund is more affordable for cost-conscious investors, featuring a 0.38% expense ratio that is 14 basis points lower than its peer. However, the VanEck fund may appeal to income-oriented investors; its 3.1% yield provides a higher payout than the 1.1% distribution offered by the iShares portfolio, representing a yield gap of nearly 2.0 percentage points.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricICLNNLR
Max drawdown (5 yr)(66.7%)(37.5%)
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$865$2,145

What's inside

The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF concentrates its 29 holdings within the nuclear power value chain, focusing heavily on energy, utility, and industrial companies. Its portfolio includes uranium miners and nuclear-focused utilities, with top holdings such as Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) at 9.20%, Cameco (NYSE:CCJ) at 8.23%, and Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE:PEG) at 8.21%. It was launched in 2007, and has paid $3.17 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$103.4 share price works out to a 3.1% yield.

The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF provides much broader diversification with 105 holdings involved in renewable electricity and electrical equipment. It filters its portfolio with an ESG screen and focuses on solar, wind, and other sustainable power solutions. Its largest positions include Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) at 9.70% and First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) at 6.97%. It was launched in 2008, and has paid $0.18 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$17.3 share price works out to a 1.1% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

Which looks like the better buy

Those seeking to invest in the clean energy movement have the opportunity to gain exposure to a range of companies in this arena through the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Now is a good time to buy, because the artificial intelligence boom has created strong demand for energy that does not rely on fossil fuels among the tech companies funding the global AI infrastructure buildout. Choosing between these two funds depends on the factors that matter most to you.

NLR has historically outperformed ICLN and offers a larger dividend. It gives you exposure to the entire nuclear supply chain from uranium mining to reactor operation. However, it sports a higher expense ratio, and nuclear projects are capital-intensive, slow-building, and sensitive to interest rates and regulatory hurdles.

ICLN delivers superior diversification with over 100 holdings compared to NLR's scant 29 stocks. It also screens to weed out companies connected to military contracting, tobacco, shale energy and other such factors. While it has delivered a lower total return over five years, the fund significantly outperformed NLR over the past year, which suggests the boon promised by AI could be starting to play out.

Should you buy stock in VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Uranium And Nuclear ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Uranium And Nuclear ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Uranium And Nuclear ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $379,986!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,404,152!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 948% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 215% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of October 14, 2026.

Robert Izquierdo has positions in First Solar. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bloom Energy, Cameco, Constellation Energy, and First Solar. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
October hike odds climb toward 60% as Goldman and BofA both flip — what Warsh's "dose of accommodation" really changedRate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
Author  Irene Q.
Sep 23, Wed
Rate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
placeholder
Strong profits, falling shares: bank earnings day one meets a memory-chip rout — with CPI and ASML aheadGoldman Sachs blew past estimates (EPS $17.01 vs $13.09 expected, profit +33%) while JPMorgan missed ($5.75 vs $5.93) and Wells Fargo fell 3% — yet the S&P 500 finished flat at 7,805.45, pinned below its record close as a memory-chip rout (SOX −2.67%, Micron under $1,000) kept the pressure on. Tonight brings the week's decider: US September CPI at 8:30 ET, then Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock and ASML before the open. Here are the levels, both cases, and the watch list.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 14, Wed
Goldman Sachs blew past estimates (EPS $17.01 vs $13.09 expected, profit +33%) while JPMorgan missed ($5.75 vs $5.93) and Wells Fargo fell 3% — yet the S&P 500 finished flat at 7,805.45, pinned below its record close as a memory-chip rout (SOX −2.67%, Micron under $1,000) kept the pressure on. Tonight brings the week's decider: US September CPI at 8:30 ET, then Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock and ASML before the open. Here are the levels, both cases, and the watch list.
placeholder
US September CPI recap: inflation hits 3.7% as core runs hot — is an October Fed hike back on the table?September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 05: 52
September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
placeholder
Gold defends $4,100 as BofA targets a break below $4,000 — why the Middle East bid is missingSpot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 06: 57
Spot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 15, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
23 mins ago
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
goTop
quote