EEM Offers Focused Growth While IXUS Provides Broad Safety

Source Motley_fool

Key Points

  • EEM charges a much higher expense ratio than IXUS but delivered a stronger 1-year total return as of March 2026.

  • IXUS holds nearly 4 times as many stocks, offering broader international diversification, while EEM concentrates on emerging markets with a heavy technology tilt.

  • EEM's volatility and historical drawdowns have been higher than IXUS, reflecting greater risk exposure.

  • 10 stocks we like better than iShares - iShares Msci Emerging Markets ETF ›

Both iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEMKT:EEM)and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (NASDAQ:IXUS)are popular iShares offerings for international exposure, but they serve distinct purposes: IXUS provides comprehensive access to developed and emerging non-U.S. stocks, while EEM zeroes in on large- and mid-cap companies from emerging markets. EEM carries a substantially higher expense ratio and narrower portfolio than IXUS, but it also posted a stronger one-year total return and leans more heavily into technology and emerging-market equities.

This comparison breaks down their cost, diversification, sector tilts, and risk profiles to help investors assess which approach may better fit their goals.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricIXUSEEM
IssueriSharesiShares
Expense ratio0.07%0.72%
1-yr return (as of 3/26/2026)26.05%32.5%
Dividend yield2.9%1.9%
Beta10.96
AUM$52.4 billion$25.6 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

EEM is much more expensive to hold than IXUS, with a 0.72% expense ratio versus just 0.07% for IXUS. IXUS also offers a higher dividend yield, with a 2.9% 12-month trailing yield as of Feb. 28, 2026 compared to EEM’s 1.94%.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricIXUSEEM
Max drawdown (5 y)-30%-37.8%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,426$1,212

What's inside

EEM focuses exclusively on emerging markets, with a pronounced tilt toward technology (34%), followed by financial services (21%) and consumer discretionary stocks (10%). The fund holds more than 1,000 companies, but its top names make up a large portion of assets: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing at 13.2%, Samsung Electronics at 5.5%, and Tencent Holdings at 3.8%. EEM has a long track record (23 years) and no unusual structural quirks.

IXUS, by contrast, spreads its more than 4,000 holdings across both developed and emerging markets, with financial services (23%), information technology (15.8%), and industrials (15.6%) as the largest sectors. Its top holdings, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing at 3.6%, Samsung Electronics at 1.5%, and ASML Holding at 1.4%, are less concentrated, providing broader diversification than EEM.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Investors looking to diversify their holdings are often told to look into international markets. While that’s solid advice, there are still some decisions to be made when it comes to allocating your dollars to international stocks. One of the biggest differences between EEM and IXUS is the type of international markets they invest in. EEM focuses on emerging markets only, that is, markets in developing nations like Brazil, Russia, India, China, and Taiwan. Emerging markets can be exciting investments, characterized by rapid industrialization, high GDP growth, and increased consumption. But there’s a downside to all this excitement: Emerging markets can be volatile, both economically and politically, and currency fluctuation is a concern.

IXUS mitigates the risk of investing in emerging markets by also holding stocks in developed international markets. This provides diversification away from domestic stocks, but with a little more stability and a higher dividend yield than EEM. Both ETFs hold Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing in the No. 1 position, which has been a lucrative bet amid the artificial intelligence boom. But TSMC makes up 13.2% of EEM’s portfolio and only 3.6% of IXUS’, a demonstration of IXUS’ broader diversification.

Should you buy stock in iShares - iShares Msci Emerging Markets ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in iShares - iShares Msci Emerging Markets ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and iShares - iShares Msci Emerging Markets ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $497,659!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,095,404!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 912% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 26, 2026.

Sarah Sidlow has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and Tencent. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Aave pushes DeFi expansion as V4 targets ‘inefficienceies of idle liquidity’Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
20 hours ago
Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
placeholder
Ripple CTO flags what’s behind XRP fee jumpsRipple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
20 hours ago
Ripple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
placeholder
Solana’s Golden Cross Faces a 16% Supply Exit That Could Derail the RallySolana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
Author  Beincrypto
20 hours ago
Solana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
placeholder
Bittensor (TAO) Breaks Out Toward $600, but an 80% Long Bias Stands in the WayBittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
Author  Beincrypto
20 hours ago
Bittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
placeholder
Gold’s 21% Fall Forms 106 Year Record While Bitcoin Stabilizes At $71,000Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
Author  Beincrypto
20 hours ago
Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
goTop
quote