Investing in Bond ETFs? Here's How MUB and VCIT Stack Up.

Source Motley_fool

Key Points

  • VCIT and MUB both keep expenses low, but VCIT delivers a higher yield and slightly better 1-year return.

  • MUB’s municipal bonds showed a much shallower five-year drawdown than VCIT’s corporates, which signals lower historical risk.

  • MUB holds over 6,000 muni bonds for broad diversification, while VCIT focuses on investment-grade corporate bonds.

  • 10 stocks we like better than iShares Trust - iShares National Muni Bond ETF ›

The Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (NASDAQ:VCIT) and the iShares National Muni Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:MUB) both offer low-cost access to investment-grade bonds, but VCIT features a higher yield and greater interest rate sensitivity, while MUB brings broader diversification and lower historical drawdown risk.

Both VCIT and MUB target high-quality U.S. fixed income, but with different investor goals in mind: VCIT tilts toward corporate bonds for higher income potential, while MUB focuses on municipal bonds, appealing to those seeking tax advantages and diversification. This comparison highlights their structural and performance trade-offs.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVCITMUB
IssuerVanguardiShares
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
1-yr return (as of 3/26/2026)6.53%4.39%
Dividend yield4.96%3.29%
Beta1.060.9
AUM$68.5 billion$42.4 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is 30-day SEC yield as of March 24 for VCIT and March 25 for MUB.

Both funds are low-cost, with VCIT slightly more affordable on expense ratio and offering a higher yield, which may appeal to income-focused investors willing to accept more interest rate sensitivity.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVCITMUB
Max drawdown (5 y)-20.57%-11.89%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,075$1,041

What's inside

MUB holds over 6,000 investment-grade municipal bonds, providing broad exposure across the U.S. muni market. With an 18.5-year track record, MUB is designed for investors seeking diversified, tax-aware bond income, and its holdings span a wide range of maturities and geographies.

VCIT, by contrast, invests in over 2,000 investment-grade corporate bonds, with a sector allocation entirely in cash and other fixed income instruments. VCIT’s focus on corporates means more exposure to credit risk and generally higher yields than municipal bonds.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Bonds offer portfolio diversification, capital preservation, and consistent income, all of which may appeal to investors, particularly in the current uncertain market environment. Both VCIT and MUB offer exposure to investment-grade bonds and low expense ratios, meaning you’re not taking on much risk or paying high fees.

The main difference between the two ETFs is the type of bonds they hold. VCIT holds corporate bonds with a weighted average maturity of 7.4 years and tracks the Bloomberg US 5-10 Year Corp Index. These bonds typically come with higher yields to offset slightly elevated credit risk, which is why VCIT’s return, yield, and max drawdown are all higher than MUB’s.

MUB tracks the ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index and holds a large universe of municipal bonds with a weighted average maturity of 7.27 years. While the ETF’s one-year return and dividend yield may not be as exciting as VCIT’s, it does have something else going for it. Interest income from municipal bonds are free from federal — and often state and local — taxes, giving investors another way to preserve capital while realizing some potential upside and cashing in on regular income.

Should you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares National Muni Bond ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares National Muni Bond ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and iShares Trust - iShares National Muni Bond ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $497,659!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,095,404!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 912% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 26, 2026.

Sarah Sidlow has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Aave pushes DeFi expansion as V4 targets ‘inefficienceies of idle liquidity’Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
19 hours ago
Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
placeholder
Ripple CTO flags what’s behind XRP fee jumpsRipple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
19 hours ago
Ripple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
placeholder
Solana’s Golden Cross Faces a 16% Supply Exit That Could Derail the RallySolana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
Author  Beincrypto
19 hours ago
Solana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
placeholder
Bittensor (TAO) Breaks Out Toward $600, but an 80% Long Bias Stands in the WayBittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
Author  Beincrypto
19 hours ago
Bittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
placeholder
Gold’s 21% Fall Forms 106 Year Record While Bitcoin Stabilizes At $71,000Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
Author  Beincrypto
19 hours ago
Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
goTop
quote