Treasury Safety or Higher Yield From Corporate Bonds? VGSH vs. VCSH

Source Motley_fool

Key Points

  • Both funds charge an identical ultra-low expense ratio, but Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF offers a slightly higher yield.

  • VCSH has outperformed VGSH over the past year but carries a higher maximum drawdown and volatility.

  • Both portfolios are highly diversified, but VCSH holds corporate bonds while VGSH focuses strictly on U.S. Treasuries.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF ›

Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (NASDAQ:VGSH) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (NASDAQ:VCSH) differ mainly in their underlying bond types, risk profiles, and recent yield, with both charging the same minimal expense but VCSH offering a modestly higher payout and higher risk.

Both VGSH and VCSH aim to deliver current income with limited price swings, but they take different routes: VGSH sticks to U.S. Treasuries, while VCSH invests in high-quality corporate bonds. This comparison explores their cost, performance, risk, and portfolio makeup to help investors decide which ETF best fit their needs.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVGSHVCSH
IssuerVanguardVanguard
Expense ratio0.03%0.03%
1-yr return (as of 2026-03-25)3.78%4.89%
Dividend yield3.95%4.34%
Beta0.250.41
AUM$32.67 billion$48.3 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

Both funds are equally affordable at a 0.03% expense ratio, but VCSH may appeal to those seeking a higher payout, as its yield edges past VGSH by 0.5 percentage points.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVGSHVCSH
Max drawdown (5 y)-5.72%-9.46%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$948$958

What's inside

Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) invests in investment-grade corporate bonds, aiming for income with only modest price movement. With more than 2500 investment grade corporate bonds and over 16 years of history, the fund’s top positions include United States Treasury Note/Bond ,and Bank of America Corp. The portfolio is diversified across hundreds of investment high-quality bonds, providing broad exposure across the corporate credit space.

Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH), by contrast, exclusively owns U.S. Treasury securities. Its largest allocations are to various Treasury notes and bonds, offering a pure-play on government credit quality and minimizing exposure to corporate credit risk.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Investors use short-term bond funds for stability, income, and lower volatility than stocks. The key consideration is whether the bond exposure is to U.S. government bonds or corporate debt. This distinction is central when choosing between the Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF and the Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF.

Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) invests exclusively in U.S. Treasury securities, so its returns depend primarily on short-term government yields. With minimal credit risk, the fund typically performs well during periods of market caution. In contrast, Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) invests in investment-grade corporate bonds, offering a higher yield but greater sensitivity to business conditions and investor sentiment toward corporate credit, rather than just to interest rates.

Investors should consider the intended role of this portfolio segment during market downturns. VGSH provides a straightforward Treasury allocation for defensive capital. VCSH offers higher income but increases exposure to corporate borrowers, making it more sensitive to economic cycles and shifts in credit market sentiment.

Should you buy stock in Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $497,659!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,095,404!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 912% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 26, 2026.

Eric Trie has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Aave pushes DeFi expansion as V4 targets ‘inefficienceies of idle liquidity’Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
17 hours ago
Aave Labs is targeting new avenues to unlock project unlock capital efficiency while attracting new users in two recent moves by the project as it charges ahead toward its V4 upgrade.  On one hand, the project introduced Aave’s V4 Reinvestment Module, a new component of V4’s unified liquidity design. That adds on to the article […]
placeholder
Ripple CTO flags what’s behind XRP fee jumpsRipple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
Author  Cryptopolitan
17 hours ago
Ripple’s XRP Ledger (XRPL) has been dealing with high transactions and fees lately. David Schwartz tried to settle the debate around why transaction costs can escalate even without a clear trigger. This comes in when the global digital assets market is trying to recover in phases amid the geopolitical chaos. The cumulative crypto market cap […]
placeholder
Solana’s Golden Cross Faces a 16% Supply Exit That Could Derail the RallySolana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
Author  Beincrypto
17 hours ago
Solana (SOL) price rose over 5% since March 24, reclaiming the $92 zone as a potential golden cross takes shape on the 4-hour chart.However, on-chain data reveals that a key holder cohort has been qui
placeholder
Bittensor (TAO) Breaks Out Toward $600, but an 80% Long Bias Stands in the WayBittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
Author  Beincrypto
17 hours ago
Bittensor (TAO) price surged over 10% in the past 24 hours and 22% over the past week, extending a breakout from a cup and handle pattern on the daily chart.The rally is backed by fading sell-side pre
placeholder
Gold’s 21% Fall Forms 106 Year Record While Bitcoin Stabilizes At $71,000Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
Author  Beincrypto
17 hours ago
Gold, the long-standing store of value, has recorded its worst consecutive losing streak in over a century. The yellow metal fell from $5,193 to $4,098 at its worst, a decline of nearly 21%, before re
goTop
quote