President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Feb. 24.
Trump believes tariffs can meaningfully replace the modern-day income tax -- but extensive revenue data from the U.S. Treasury suggests otherwise.
Additionally, two studies from four New York Federal Reserve economists intimate that Trump's tariffs are doing more harm than good to consumers and Wall Street.
On Feb. 24, President Donald Trump delivered his highly anticipated State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. His speech outlined accomplishments and milestones reached since taking office -- e.g., the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI), S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), and Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) have all hit several record-closing highs -- as well as laid out select policy proposals for the upcoming year.
Of note, Trump championed tariffs as "one of the primary reasons for our country's stunning economic turnaround." He went so far as to proclaim that tariffs could one day prominently replace the income tax:
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
[As] time goes by, I believe the tariffs, paid for by foreign countries, will, like in the past, substantially replace the modern-day system of income tax, taking a great financial burden off the people that I love.
But can tariffs really replace the income tax? Diving into the data tells the whole story.
President Trump speaking to a joint session of Congress. Image source: Official White House Photo.
According to data from the U.S. Treasury, the federal government collected $5.23 trillion in revenue for fiscal year (FY) 2025 (the government's fiscal year ends on Sept. 30). Approximately 51% ($2.66 trillion) was traced back to individual income taxes.
By comparison, customs duties, which include tariffs on goods imported into the country, accounted for about 4% of FY 2025 revenue.
Based on data from the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model, the tariffs recently struck down by the Supreme Court that President Trump implemented under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) resulted in roughly $175 billion in revenue for the federal government. Meanwhile, in June 2025, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected annual tariff revenue would average $300 billion over the next decade.
Statistically, actual and estimated tariff figures are miles apart from income tax revenue. Even if the CBO's average annual estimate proved accurate, it would only make up 11% of the revenue brought in from the individual income tax in FY 2025.
What's more, even with added tariff revenue, the federal government ran a $1.78 trillion deficit in FY 2025. The data make clear that there's virtually no chance of tariffs replacing the income tax anytime soon, if ever.
Image source: Getty Images.
Moreover, two comprehensive studies from four New York Federal Reserve economists writing for Liberty Street Economics suggest tariffs may be doing more harm than good for consumers and the stock market.
Less than two weeks ago, the four economists examined who's ultimately been paying for the tariffs established under IEEPA. According to "Who Is Paying for the 2025 U.S. Tariffs?," U.S. importers bore the cost of Trump's tariffs between 86% and 94% of the time (the authors broke their analysis into three separate periods, ranging from January through November 2025).
A separate study ("Do Import Tariffs Protect U.S. Firms?") released in December 2024 examined the impact of Trump's China tariffs in 2018-2019 on the public companies impacted by them. The economists found that, on average, public companies experienced declines in employment, labor productivity, sales, and profits from 2019 to 2021 due to Trump's China tariffs.
Not only are tariffs unlikely to substantially replace the income tax, but they appear to be more of a hindrance than a help to the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite.
Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $409,970!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,174,241!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 889% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 192% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of February 25, 2026.
Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.