Apple Could Dominate the Agentic AI Market With Siri. Just Not This Siri.

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Meta's Muse is far more capable than Apple's Siri.

  • AI agents are only going to get more capable and more autonomous.

  • At some point, even die-hard Apple fans will be tempted to abandon their iPhones if high-end hardware no longer powers the most capable software.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) launched a new version of Siri just last month, and it's undoubtedly the best version of the personal agent the company has ever released. Siri can now interact like other artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots by answering more in-depth questions; it also has on-screen awareness and more personal context than before because it can search through photos, emails, and texts.

But as helpful as all of this is, just a few weeks after its launch, Siri still feels dated.

Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »

With the recent launch of Meta Platforms' (NASDAQ: META) popular Muse app, which can autonomously complete personal tasks such as booking a flight and shopping online, it's clear that Siri still doesn't measure up.

That's a problem for Apple -- and I think it's one the company can solve. But there's a lot at stake if it keeps getting agentic AI wrong.

The Apple logo on a dark background.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Apple's new threat

Most of my personal devices are Apple products, and I've been less than enthused by Siri for years now. The latest update was a big leap forward, but it essentially caught Apple up with where OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude were several years ago.

And now there's another threat.

Meta's Muse easily helps users with all sorts of tasks, including booking flights, reserving tables at restaurants, ordering groceries, buying clothes online, and more. It's the type of personal AI assistant that many tech companies have talked about for years, finally built into a simple app.

Muse has reached the top of Apple's App Store and has more than 3 million weekly users. That rapid adoption is a good sign that consumers want these capabilities, and there are some important reasons Apple should take notice.

Apple's hardware sales could be at risk

The bulk of Apple's revenue -- around 50% -- comes from selling its high-margin iPhones. The margins have taken a bit of a hit recently because of soaring memory prices, but management still estimates gross margins will be around 47%.

For decades, Apple has paired high-end devices with top-notch software that consumers mostly love. But Muse and other agents could chip away at this sentiment by offering superior capabilities.

Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan is concerned about this threat. Mohan said in an investor note last month that Muse could cut into Apple's services revenue by completing online transactions outside of Apple's ecosystem.

What's more, if more consumers view Muse as essential to their daily routines, they could shift their smartphone buying habits away from expensive iPhones and toward cheaper Android devices that run Muse just as well.

It's still too early to tell whether that will happen, but as users grow more accustomed to highly capable AI agents, paying premium prices for Apple hardware without robust AI built in may not make sense for many smartphone buyers.

Why Apple could still dominate agentic AI

The biggest hurdle for Muse, and Apple's biggest advantage, is that most users don't trust Meta with their data. A recent Oppenheimer survey found that just 8% of respondents said they trust Meta with their passwords. In contrast, 28% of respondents said they would trust Apple with their passwords.

Trust isn't the only factor in winning the agentic AI space, but it's a start. The next step is, of course, for Apple to design Siri to work better within third-party apps to complete autonomous tasks. The real problem for Apple isn't the technical know-how; it may be whether Apple's management believes the company needs to make such a leap with Siri to stay relevant.

The latest version of Siri is a step in the right direction, but as an Apple shareholder myself, I wonder how long it will be before Siri catches up to other AI agents. If Apple is in the same place it is now a year from now, after the next iteration of Siri has presumably debuted, Apple's AI software miss could turn into a hardware sales problem.

Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 14x Bigger

Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005.

But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout, a massive technology build-out that Google’s CEO says could be more profound than fire or electricity.

While everyone watches the chip designers, one "backbone" company provides the critical technology that Nvidia and AMD literally cannot function without. We’ve detailed this under-the-radar player in our new AI Playbook.

Continue »

Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Chris Neiger has positions in Apple. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
October hike odds climb toward 60% as Goldman and BofA both flip — what Warsh's "dose of accommodation" really changedRate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
Author  Irene Q.
Sep 23, Wed
Rate futures now price roughly 55% to 62% for a 25bp hike at the October 27-28 FOMC, up from about 30% before Chair Warsh's post-meeting framing that the Fed is merely "removing some accommodation." Goldman Sachs has added an October hike to its forecast and Bank of America now sees moves in both October and December. Here is the repricing, the language behind it, and the two data points that decide it.
placeholder
Strong profits, falling shares: bank earnings day one meets a memory-chip rout — with CPI and ASML aheadGoldman Sachs blew past estimates (EPS $17.01 vs $13.09 expected, profit +33%) while JPMorgan missed ($5.75 vs $5.93) and Wells Fargo fell 3% — yet the S&P 500 finished flat at 7,805.45, pinned below its record close as a memory-chip rout (SOX −2.67%, Micron under $1,000) kept the pressure on. Tonight brings the week's decider: US September CPI at 8:30 ET, then Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock and ASML before the open. Here are the levels, both cases, and the watch list.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 14, Wed
Goldman Sachs blew past estimates (EPS $17.01 vs $13.09 expected, profit +33%) while JPMorgan missed ($5.75 vs $5.93) and Wells Fargo fell 3% — yet the S&P 500 finished flat at 7,805.45, pinned below its record close as a memory-chip rout (SOX −2.67%, Micron under $1,000) kept the pressure on. Tonight brings the week's decider: US September CPI at 8:30 ET, then Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, BlackRock and ASML before the open. Here are the levels, both cases, and the watch list.
placeholder
US September CPI recap: inflation hits 3.7% as core runs hot — is an October Fed hike back on the table?September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
Author  Irene Q.
19 hours ago
September CPI landed hot: headline 3.7% y/y, core 2.6% y/y and 0.3% m/m. October hike odds jumped from ~22% to ~37% — yet the dollar faded to 101.74, gold closed higher and the S&P 500 fell 1.11%. Here is the full repricing, the levels and what to watch next.
placeholder
Gold defends $4,100 as BofA targets a break below $4,000 — why the Middle East bid is missingSpot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
Author  Irene Q.
18 hours ago
Spot gold flushed to $4,099.89, a whisker above October's $4,090 low, then rebounded to close at $4,138.25 (+0.82%) — even as US CPI ran hot. Bank of America sees gold below $4,000 within three months, citing shrinking demand and official-sector selling. Here are the levels, the drivers and what would flip the script.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - October 15, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
18 hours ago
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for October 15, 2026. Read on for the details.
goTop
quote