XRP has dropped over 60% from its July peak despite major bullish catalysts like the SEC case resolution and ETF launches coming to fruition.
Ripple's most widely adopted banking product doesn't actually require XRP.
Ripple's pivot toward its own RLUSD stablecoin could weaken demand for XRP.
The cryptocurrency XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) has lost more than 60% of its value since peaking near $3.65 last July. It now trades around $1.38, roughly the same price it was before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) dropped its case against Ripple and before spot XRP exchange-traded funds (ETFs) -- like the Canary XRP ETF -- launched in the U.S. Two of the biggest catalysts bulls had been waiting years for have come and gone, and the token is right back where it started.
And yet, Ripple -- the company behind XRP -- is in the strongest position it's ever been in. Its RLUSD stablecoin has crossed $1.6 billion in market capitalization. Ripple spent more than $2 billion on acquisitions last year, including a prime brokerage clearing over $3 trillion annually. The company was even granted a national trust bank charter.
Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
And according to Motley Fool Research, this is happening as more people than ever own crypto.
So why is XRP still down? And where will XRP's price be five years from now?
The banking system's adoption of Ripple's technology should, in theory, drive demand for the token. That's the narrative that has made XRP one of the most popular cryptocurrencies on the market. But this misunderstands how banks actually use Ripple's products.
RippleNet (Ripple has recently rebranded its products, but it's useful to use the names people know) is a settlement system that enables faster, cheaper cross-border transactions. But it's essentially a messaging service, and banks use it without ever touching XRP. This is the product that 300-plus banking partnerships -- including Bank of America and Santander -- actually rely on.
Image source: Getty Images.
On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) -- again, since rebranded, but ODL is what people know -- is the product that uses XRP as a bridge asset, converting dollars to XRP and then into the destination currency. Bulls argue that growing ODL adoption will drive token demand, but this doesn't really hold up.
ODL primarily serves smaller institutions -- fintechs and remittance providers, not major banks. Thus, its volume is much smaller compared to RippleNet. And institutions immediately convert in and out of XRP, meaning each buy is instantly matched with a sell, further limiting any sustained demand.
And now Ripple itself has pivoted hard toward stablecoins. The company spent $200 million to acquire the stablecoin payments platform Rail and now prominently features "integrate stablecoin payments into your business" on its website. That's an issue for XRP because RLUSD can function as an alternative bridge asset in ODL transactions, offering the same speed with more price stability. That's a no-brainer for banks that prize little above safety and stability.
Ripple wins either way. XRP holders don't.
In five years, Ripple will likely be a thriving payments infrastructure company -- even more so than today. With a bank charter, a growing stablecoin, a prime brokerage, and 300-plus institutional partnerships, the company has built something real.
But even if Ripple's products genuinely transform cross-border banking, I don't think XRP holders will benefit. The token's utility within its own ecosystem is being quietly replaced by a stablecoin that Ripple itself created. In five years, I see the cryptocurrency XRP struggling to keep up with the broader market, or worse.
Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $514,000!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,105,029!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 930% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 187% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 17, 2026.
Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.