A new syndicate-backed stablecoin, Open USD, just launched.
Its primary innovation is routing revenue from usage to its distributors rather than to a centralized entity.
Circle is threatened by the new coin, but Tether less so.
Open USD (CRYPTO: OUSD) is a brand new stablecoin backed by a syndicate of financial businesses, and it's already clear that its existence will have major implications for the stablecoin market. It launched Sept. 30, 2026, and its supply had reached $668 million by Oct. 2, adding hundreds of millions in value over the course of just a few days. It's in direct competition with the two leaders of the stablecoin market, the USDC (CRYPTO: USDC) stablecoin offered by Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL), as well as Tether's (CRYPTO: USDT) stablecoin.
OUSD's backers are a who's who of financial heavyweights, including Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, and Coinbase, among many others; they earn rewards and equity tied to the supply and activity they drive. But why would these payment giants back a stablecoin that competes with coins they already support when they already profit from rival stablecoins? Here's what you need to know.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Image source: Getty Images.
In a nutshell, stablecoin issuers earn interest on the reserves that back the coin's value.
Those reserves are heavily composed of Treasuries and other cash equivalents. Circle shares some of its reserve revenue with the distributors of USDC, like Coinbase, whereas Tether keeps much of it and relies on crypto-native users for distribution.
Interestingly, Open USD flips that default configuration in a way that makes it significantly more likely to be widely distributed.
Its distribution partners are allowed to collect the reserve income from the portion of the supply that they distribute to their clients by default, after a small management fee; there's no one central entity that gets to keep the income. Therefore, revenue from reserves scales directly with the activity that each distribution partner is able to drive via their own efforts to promote it via their own operations and within their own payment networks. In turn, that heavily incentivizes distributors to compete for as wide and deep a distribution as possible, and it also means that competing businesses can participate in the OUSD syndicate without fear of accidentally helping their competitors.
Visa said on Sept. 8 that its stablecoin settlement volume had surpassed a $20 billion annualized pace, more than 15 times the prior year's level. Businesses can already mint their own OUSD through Mastercard and Visa's stablecoin platforms.
But neither company is picking one winner as far as their preferred stablecoin goes, despite their association with OUSD. Both run network validators, which are the computers that confirm transactions, on Circle's new Arc blockchain for stablecoins, and both say they still support USDC.
So for holders of Visa or Mastercard stock, OUSD is a cheap bet on stablecoin growth. In other words, Visa and Mastercard don't need to push OUSD to win or to grow in a general sense. They need to run more stablecoin traffic across their various payment channels to ensure that they're well positioned for the future, when the money flowing on blockchain rails could be several orders of magnitude more than it is today.
Circle has the most to lose, and OUSD is indeed a real threat to its business.
In Q2 2026, it paid $410.4 million in distribution and transaction costs, or a share of 58.5% of its $701.3 million in revenue and reserve income. Now, every distributor has an alternative to raise at its next negotiation.
Tether looks somewhat safer. Its flagship USDT stablecoin operates outside of U.S. regulations, and its U.S.-regulated stablecoin, USAT, is not in wide distribution, and it had only $183 million in circulation as of Oct. 2. So its exposure is smaller in the near term, though OUSD's 200-plus partners already include UBS and Japan's SBI Holdings.
If you hold Circle's stock, the launch of OUSD should be a reminder to reevaluate your investment thesis. Circle is nowhere near being in deep danger, but the competitive landscape just shifted against it.
Before you buy stock in Origin Dollar, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Origin Dollar wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $361,650!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,437,517!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 936% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 213% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 5, 2026.
Alex Carchidi has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Mastercard and Visa. The Motley Fool recommends Coinbase Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.