Fed Chair Kevin Warsh and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kicked off the fourth rate-hiking cycle of the century on Sept. 16.
Trump has been exceptionally critical of the FOMC’s unwillingness to slash interest rates.
Trumpflation is a core catalyst behind soaring bond yields and the need to raise the federal funds target rate.
Additionally, rapidly rising U.S. debt and artificial intelligence (AI) hyperscalers competing for capital have quashed any discussion of interest rate cuts.
Statistically, Wall Street has enjoyed having Donald Trump in the White House. Even though some of the stock market's highest-volatility events have occurred under President Trump (e.g., the COVID-19 crash in February-March 2020 and tariff tantrum in April 2025), the average annual return of the iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI), broad-based S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC), and innovation-driven Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC) are higher under Trump than under most other presidents.
However, the bull market that's thrived under President Trump is at risk of being upended by the start of only the fourth rate-hiking cycle of the 21st century.
Missed AI’s "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we’re only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the global rollout. Continue »
President Trump has repeatedly called on the Fed to slash interest rates. Image source: Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks, courtesy of the National Archives.
On Sept. 16, Fed Chair Kevin Warsh and 11 other voting Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members raised the federal funds target rate by 25 basis points to 3.75%-4.00%. President Trump's handpicked successor to Jerome Powell has repeatedly said that inflation is too high and that the Fed will "deliver price stability."
But President Trump sees things differently. He recently told reporters that:
I'm relying on Kevin [Warsh], but he's got, you know, a very tough board. He's got a board that was put there by a lot of other people. And the interest rates are too high, they're not appropriate.
Criticizing the central bank isn't new for the president. Since the beginning of his second non-consecutive term, he was critical of now-former Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the FOMC for not slashing interest rates. For added context, the FOMC did lower the federal funds target rate six times between September 2024 and December 2025, but not quickly enough for the president's liking.
PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS HE TOLD FED CHAIR KEVIN WARSH TO "VOTE WITH THE BOARD" ON TODAY'S RATE HIKE BECAUSE "IT'S NOT GOING TO MATTER" 🇺🇸
— WOLF (@WOLF_Financial) September 17, 2026
Asked if he still has confidence in Warsh, Trump said yes, then went after the rest of the Fed.
"He's got a very tough board. He's got a board… pic.twitter.com/VdLmgxTjzZ
Trump has repeatedly argued that interest rates should be lowered to 1% or below and has admonished the central bank for hindering America's growth potential.
While it's possible that lower interest rates could fuel America's economy, the bond market believes that would be a terrible idea.
On paper, it's understandable why businesses and investors aren't too keen about the FOMC kicking off a rate-hiking cycle. Higher interest rates make it costlier to service variable-rate debt.
Additionally, the stock market's No. 1 catalyst, the artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure build-out, is being financed in part by debt. If the AI data center build-out slows, even marginally, it may spell disaster for the historically expensive bull market that's thrived under Trump.
But it's no coincidence that long-duration Treasury bond yields have ascended to the heavens this year. The 30-year Treasury bond yield has topped 5.5%, a level last seen in 2003, while the 10-year yield -- the benchmark for mortgage rates -- has soared to 5.25%, a 19-year high.
The bond market is sending a very clear message to Wall Street, investors, and even President Trump: rate cuts aren't an option due to three glaring concerns.
Image source: Getty Images.
For starters, persistently elevated inflation is problematic. While a modest level of inflation is expected in a growing economy, several of the president's policies, including tariffs and the Trump-led Iran war, have become burdensome on consumers.
President Trump's tariffs were designed to promote domestic manufacturing, protect American jobs, and make American-made goods more price-competitive with imported products. Unfortunately, adding duties to unfinished goods (e.g., steel) used to complete the manufacture of products in the U.S. can raise production costs, which are then passed on to consumers.
US Diesel prices hit another record high today at $6.53/gallon, up 74% since the Iran war began.
— Charlie Bilello (@charliebilello) September 24, 2026
The damage from skyrocketing diesel prices won’t stop at the pump.
Higher freight, farming & shipping costs will ripple through the entire economy, raising consumer prices on almost… pic.twitter.com/d4KU1QDeWx
Meanwhile, the ongoing Iran war has led to the largest modern-day energy supply disruption, pushing diesel prices to record levels.
The more entrenched Trumpflation (inflation that's driven by President Trump's policies) becomes, the more aggressive the Fed will have to be to uproot it.
The parabolic move we're witnessing in long-duration bond yields reflects bond traders' desire to receive higher compensation (i.e., higher yields) amid persistently elevated inflation.
Soaring long-duration bond yields also signal displeasure with America's unsustainable federal deficits.
In mid-August, U.S. total debt surpassed $40 trillion for the first time, fueled by annual federal deficits ranging from $1.38 trillion to $3.13 trillion over the previous six years. With the exception of 1998-2001, the federal government has run a deficit every year since 1970.
BREAKING: US national debt is forecasted to hit $48 trillion under Trump pic.twitter.com/zaY8mcEh0y
— Kalshi (@Kalshi) September 28, 2026
While Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested that lower interest rates are needed to fuel economic growth, the true benefit of lower lending rates is that they would make it considerably easier for the U.S. to service its rapidly growing debt.
However, the bond market has made it clear that lower lending rates aren't on the horizon. Even though the federal government hasn't missed an interest payment and has historically made good on its debt obligations, long-term debt holders want higher yields to offset the added risk of the U.S. continuing to pile on debt.
The third reason Donald Trump's calls for rate cuts aren't feasible concerns the aforementioned AI infrastructure build-out.
In speaking with the press after the September FOMC meeting, Fed Chair Kevin Warsh laid part of the blame for rising yields on the competition for capital among hyperscalers:
The surge in capital expenditures, which I referenced in my remarks, is real, and so-called hyperscalers are out in the market raising funding. And so the competition for capital is real, and I think it partly explains the increase in yields.
In simple terms, corporate debt issuances are competing for the same pool of investors as Treasury bond buyers. This competition is pushing up yields, making it impossible for the central bank to seriously consider reducing interest rates.
While the bond market isn't telling us how much Fed Chair Warsh and his colleagues should raise the federal funds target rate, it's made it crystal clear that interest rates aren't high enough and Fed rate hikes are appropriate, given the aforementioned headwinds.
Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $365,910!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,418,530!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 930% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 3, 2026.
Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.