Better Healthcare ETF: Vanguard's VHT vs. State Street's Pharmaceuticals-Focused XPH
Key Points
The Vanguard Health Care ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio and a higher dividend yield than the State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF.
The State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF provides concentrated exposure to drug manufacturers, while the Vanguard Health Care ETF covers a broader range of medical services and equipment.
While the State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF has seen stronger 1-year total returns, it has historically experienced a much deeper maximum drawdown.
- 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard World Fund - Vanguard Health Care ETF ›
Comparing the Vanguard Health Care ETF (NYSEMKT:VHT) and State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (NYSEMKT:XPH) involves choosing between broad healthcare sector coverage and a concentrated focus on pharmaceutical industry players.
These two funds represent different ways to play the healthcare market. While the Vanguard fund casts a wide net across insurers, equipment providers, and biotechnology, the State Street fund targets the drug manufacturing industry specifically. Investors often use these vehicles to capture defensive qualities and innovation-driven growth.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | XPH | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | State Street | Vanguard |
| Share price | $72.29 (as of 2026-08-20) | $323.69 (as of 2026-08-20) |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| 1-yr return (as of 2026-08-20) | 57.2% | 29.3% |
| Dividend yield | 0.5% | 1.5% |
| Beta | 0.59 | 0.60 |
| AUM | $570.6 million | $20.9 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from monthly returns over the available fund history (up to five years). The 1-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.
The Vanguard fund is the more affordable choice with an expense ratio of 0.09%, while the State Street fund charges 0.35%. Additionally, the Vanguard fund offers a higher payout, yielding 1.5% compared to the pharmaceutical fund's 0.5%.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | XPH | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | (30.9%) | (17.7%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return) | $1,574 | $1,333 |
What's inside
The Vanguard Health Care ETF provides exposure to 411 holdings, covering healthcare (99%) and technology. It operates under a passive management style and its largest positions include Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) at 13.40%, Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) at 8.84%, and AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV) at 6.45%. The fund was launched in 2004, and has paid $4.72 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$323.7 share price works out to a 1.5% yield.
The State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF is a more focused vehicle with 65 holdings entirely within the healthcare sector. It seeks to track the performance of the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, and its top holdings include Amylyx Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:AMLX) at 4.19% and MBX Biosciences (NASDAQ:MBX) at 3.05%. The fund was launched in 2006, and has paid $0.34 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$72.3 share price works out to a 0.5% yield.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
Which looks like the better buy
Investors seeking exposure to the healthcare sector have two ways to do so through the Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH). Choosing between them depends on which fund is better-suited to your individual investment goals.
XPH's pharmaceuticals focus holds the possibility for outsized gains. This makes it the better fund for growth-oriented investors who prioritize upside potential over other factors, such as dividend income and expense ratio. The fund uses an equal-weight approach, which provides the opportunity for all of its holdings to contribute to the ETF's returns.
However, XPH is more volatile than VHT, as evidenced by its larger max drawdown. Because of its singular focus, the fund is vulnerable to downturns in the pharmaceuticals industry, such as from the impact of regulatory or clinical setbacks.
VHT is for investors who want broad exposure across the healthcare sector, and is a particularly good choice for those who hold over the long term, given the fund's low expense ratio combined with its far higher dividend yield. About 34% of the ETF comprises pharmaceutical companies, so it's well-rounded and highly diversified with more than 400 holdings. That said, VHT is market cap-weighted, meaning its performance depends primarily on its large-cap stocks.
Should you buy stock in Vanguard World Fund - Vanguard Health Care ETF right now?
Before you buy stock in Vanguard World Fund - Vanguard Health Care ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard World Fund - Vanguard Health Care ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $410,024!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,372,815!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 950% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 10, 2026.
Robert Izquierdo has positions in Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AbbVie and Eli Lilly. The Motley Fool recommends Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Recommended Articles
