Warren Buffett admitted to several costly mistakes in his legendary investing career, including a $431 million investment that "rather promptly" went to zero.
Yet Berkshire Hathaway stock has returned millions of percentages since 1965 thanks to, in Buffett's words, "about a dozen truly good decisions."
This handful of winners overwhelm his losing picks thanks to the asymmetrical nature of investing.
One of the most admirable features of Warren Buffett's 83-year investing career (he bought his first stock at age 11) is how freely he admits to mistakes at Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B). In each of his annual letters to shareholders, he could simply tout Berkshire's massive historical outperformance, and highlight his biggest winners.
But the Oracle of Omaha, who analyzed Dale Carnegie's book How to Win Friends and Influence People as a youth, seems to have taken the book's 12th Principle, to admit mistakes "quickly and emphatically," to heart. In his letters and public statements, he shines a light on his missteps and mistakes he says are purely his own.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks »
Yet you can't achieve a return from 1965 to 2024 of 5,500,000% without getting a few things right. What most people don't understand is that in Buffett's case, it really does come down to getting just a few things right. In his own words, Berkshire's multimillion-percent rise came down to "about a dozen truly good decisions -- that would be about one every five years."
To understand the power of just a few good ideas, consider two investments that Buffett made in 2011 that turned out very differently.
In 2011, Buffett announced that, despite his long-standing aversion to investing in technology firms, he had invested $10.7 billion in International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM) buying 64 million shares. Explaining his decision, he suggested that IBM had the "moat," or protection in its business model from competitors, that he cherishes in investments, saying, "It's a company that helps IT departments do their job better. There is a lot of continuity to it."
But Buffett got his IBM bet wrong. For most of the time that Berkshire held shares, the tech titan was on a 22-quarter streak of declining revenue. By 2018, Buffett had sold his last shares, hinting that the company faced stronger competition than he had reckoned with.
Now, the IBM investment wasn't a total disaster for Berkshire Hathaway, or even unprofitable. While shares trended lower since 2011, dividends allowed the investment to eke out an estimated 5% overall gain. But given how the S&P 500 returned around 16% in that time frame, it stung for a $10.7 billion investment to return just 5% over seven years.
But also in 2011, Berkshire made a much more promising investment in buying shares of Visa (NYSE: V). In the 14 years since, Visa shares have risen from Buffett's average initial purchase price of around $22 per share to about $340 per share today, a more than 15-fold increase. Along the way, Visa hiked its dividend by 1,687%, giving Berkshire an effective 12.1% yield on its initial investment.
Outcomes like this are what Buffett means by when he said in his 2022 letter, "The weeds wither away in significance as the flowers bloom." The gains from these rare, "about once every five years" home runs can overwhelm flat investments like the IBM disappointment, or even missteps like his 1993 investment in Dexter Shoe, in which his $433 million position "rather promptly" went to zero.
Image source: Getty Images.
It's a striking coincidence that the total amount Buffett invested in Visa is almost identical to the amount lost on the Dexter Shoes blunder. In the former instance, the initial investment turned into a 15-bagger, plus an explosively growing income stream resulting from 14 prodigious dividend hikes. In the latter, shares went to zero.
Put them together, accounting for the fact that Buffett added to his Visa position in later years, and it's about a 277% increase, not including dividends. This asymmetrical upside shows how weeds "wither in significance" as Berkshire's winning picks extend their run.
Before you buy stock in Visa, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Visa wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $604,044!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,220,149!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,064% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 194% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of November 10, 2025
William Dahl has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway, International Business Machines, and Visa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.