The 2 Best Consumer Staples Stocks to Buy and Hold for Decades

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • Companies like Procter & Gamble and Colgate-Palmolive have embedded themselves so deeply into daily habits that buying their products stops feeling like a decision at all.

  • Their growth narratives are less about convincing people to switch and more about scaling trust and upgrading within it.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Colgate-Palmolive ›

Some companies that are strong investments aren't selling brands and products that I think about daily; they're just there in my everyday life, built into the flow of my day without me noticing. I'll reach for the same products every morning, not because I compared options, but because I've used them for so long it doesn't even feel like a decision anymore.

That quiet, almost invisible, presence is what makes these two consumer staples companies so powerful. They've become part of how people live, not just what they buy. And because of that, their shares are solid decade-long holds.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

An adult and child brush their teeth in the mirror.

Image source: Getty Images.

Procter & Gamble owns your morning routine

Before most people have made a single conscious decision in the morning, they have already used a Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) product -- probably several. The toothbrush next to the sink may be Oral-B. The shampoo might be Pantene or Head & Shoulders. Their deodorant is Old Spice or Secret. The laundry detergent they'll use later is Tide. None of that spending is the result of advertising working in real time. It is the result of years of habit formation that now runs on autopilot.

This is what makes Procter & Gamble something other than just a consumer goods company. It is a behavioral infrastructure company. Its products have become so deeply woven into people's daily routines that switching requires active effort, and most people, under most circumstances, have no reason or desire to make that effort. That psychological stickiness is a moat that no balance sheet can capture.

CFO Andre Schulten said it plainly during the company's most recent earnings call: "Consumers respond well if we give them a truly better proposition in the categories we are in because they see there is upside." That encapsulates my thesis in one sentence. P&G doesn't ask consumers to switch. It asks them to upgrade within brands they already trust -- from standard Tide to Tide Pods, from regular Pampers to Pampers Pure. The margin profile on those higher-tier products is meaningfully better for the company, and consumers make those moves with less psychological resistance because their relationships with the brands are already established.

What gives the next decade its particular shape for P&G is that it is now beginning that same process in earnest across Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Africa. These are markets where growing middle classes are moving from generic products to branded essentials for the first time. Procter & Gamble has done this before: It sold Tide to American households in the 1940s, established Pampers in Western Europe in the 1970s, and entered China in the 1990s.

The playbook is not new, and it has never failed to generate decades of compounding growth. Brand formation like this creates wealth. The honest truth with P&G is that it has grown large enough that its acceleration is structurally limited, and meanwhile, private-label alternatives continue improving to the point where they capture meaningful market share from value-sensitive households. Those are real pressures. But the consumer who buys a store-brand detergent during a tight economic stretch almost always returns to Tide when that stretch ends. That is not loyalty born of convenience. Procter & Gamble has been building that loyalty for 189 years.

2. Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive's (NYSE: CL) Colgate toothpaste is arguably present in more households worldwide than any other single-branded product. More ubiquitous than any fast-food logo, or virtually any technology you can name. In Brazil, India, Mexico, China, the Philippines, and throughout sub-Saharan Africa, Colgate is not one option among several -- it is the toothpaste you use.

Dentists in countries where the company has operated for decades were trained on Colgate clinical materials, learned to recommend Colgate products, and passed those recommendations on to their patients, who passed the habit to their children. The brand has embedded itself into the trusted authority network of oral health in a way that no competitor can replicate with a marketing budget -- because the trust was built not through advertising, but through professional endorsement over generations.

CEO Noel Wallace said during the company's most recent earnings call that growth was "led by emerging markets," where its brands hold the highest market share and the greatest scale advantages. The reason is not pricing or distribution alone -- it is that Colgate arrived in those markets early, built trust in communities where dental health awareness was just emerging, and became the default. That default status, once earned, is nearly permanent.

Morgan Stanley named Colgate-Palmolive its top consumer sector pick for 2026. The company also gained global toothpaste market share in the first quarter of 2026 -- a category where it already leads -- a result that suggests the brand is not defending old ground, but actively expanding.

Should you buy stock in Colgate-Palmolive right now?

Before you buy stock in Colgate-Palmolive, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Colgate-Palmolive wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $475,926!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,296,608!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 981% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 205% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 8, 2026.

Micah Zimmerman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Colgate-Palmolive. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
April NFP Lands at 8:30 AM Today — 65K Forecast, a New Fed Chair, and the Dollar at Triple-Bottom SupportApril 2026 NFP forecast 62K–70K vs March 178K. Unemployment expected 4.3%. Fed on hold at 3.50–3.75% with Kevin Warsh as new chair. DXY triple-bottom at $97.69. Trade setup inside.The Apr
Author  TradingKey
9 hours ago
April 2026 NFP forecast 62K–70K vs March 178K. Unemployment expected 4.3%. Fed on hold at 3.50–3.75% with Kevin Warsh as new chair. DXY triple-bottom at $97.69. Trade setup inside.The Apr
placeholder
WTI falls to near $93.50 after Israel, Iran signal an end to hostilitiesWest Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price loses ground after registering modest gains in the previous day, trading around $93.70 per barrel during the Asian hours on Friday.
Author  FXStreet
18 hours ago
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil price loses ground after registering modest gains in the previous day, trading around $93.70 per barrel during the Asian hours on Friday.
placeholder
WTI and Brent Futures Both Fall Below $100 Mark, Have Oil Prices and Energy Sector Peaked?WTI crude oil futures settled at $96.21 per barrel on May 6, plunging 6.3% to close below $100 for the first time in six days, marking the largest single-day decline since March 17. Brent
Author  TradingKey
Yesterday 10: 07
WTI crude oil futures settled at $96.21 per barrel on May 6, plunging 6.3% to close below $100 for the first time in six days, marking the largest single-day decline since March 17. Brent
placeholder
Bitcoin jumps to three-month high as US–Iran talks unwind oil risk premiumGlobal markets moved sharply on Wednesday as signs of progress in US–Iran negotiations triggered a rapid unwind of war-driven positions, dragging oil prices lower while lifting equities and cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin climbed above $81,000, its highest level in three months, while Brent crude fell roughly 11% to around $98 per barrel. The S&P 500 rose 0.85%...
Author  Cryptopolitan
Yesterday 06: 34
Global markets moved sharply on Wednesday as signs of progress in US–Iran negotiations triggered a rapid unwind of war-driven positions, dragging oil prices lower while lifting equities and cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin climbed above $81,000, its highest level in three months, while Brent crude fell roughly 11% to around $98 per barrel. The S&P 500 rose 0.85%...
placeholder
WTI Crude Falls Over 13% Below $90. US and Iran to Reach Truce Memorandum but Crude Supply Difficult to Recover in Short TermBefore the market opened on May 5, international crude oil losses widened, WTI crude oil futures plummeted below $90 at one point, hitting a low of $88.71, the first time since April 21,
Author  TradingKey
Yesterday 06: 16
Before the market opened on May 5, international crude oil losses widened, WTI crude oil futures plummeted below $90 at one point, hitting a low of $88.71, the first time since April 21,
goTop
quote