Magnificent Seven, Markets, and Mailbag with CEO Tom Gardner

In this episode of Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Fool co-founder and CEO Tom Gardner joins Motley Fool contributors Tyler Crowe and Jon Quast to discuss:

• The market’s reactions to the earnings reports of Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta.
• What matters most about AI infrastructure spending.
• The rising costs for the hyperscalers: fear or opportunity?
• The lowest consumer sentiment readings of all time.
• What works when everyone is miserable.
• If it’s a problem that Nvidia’s customers are building their own chips.

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

This podcast was recorded on April 30, 2026.

Tyler Crowe: Fifty-seven percent of the Mag 7 earnings today on Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. New name. Same great investing podcast. I'm Tyler Crowe, and today I'm joined by longtime fool contributor Jon Quast, and we have a special guest today, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner. Tom, thank you for joining us today.

Tom Gardner: Pleasure to be here.

Tyler Crowe: I want to put you on spot because we just did the name change to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Give me the quick elevator pitch with the name change.

Tom Gardner: Well, the spirit of our podcasts in the Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing podcasts and our Rule Breaker Investing podcast is to present our two primary approaches to long-term investing. In the case of Rule Breakers is to look for innovative breakthrough businesses. In the case of Hidden Gems is to really look at the ownership leadership, and the financial management of companies on a growth path. Both styles are very similar. In that they both share a passion for holding stocks for the very long term, being investors in the stock market throughout our entire lives. But we have two different wrinkles on how to look at companies, and we love having those two different brands in The Motley Fool, and they're expressed here in podcast form.

Tyler Crowe: Great, we get to do this on this podcast. For today on the docket, we're going to pull a question out of the mailbag that we're getting lots of responses for. We're going to do what we're calling Tom's mystery box topic because he's the guest of honor today. But first, we're going to start with the Magnificent Seven earnings, or specifically four out of the seven, because within the past 24 hours, or at least since we posted our last show, we've had Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta all post results. It's remarkable how the market seems to be playing this. One of these things is not like the other right now. Go up and down the press releases for all four of these companies, and you more or less see the same thing: massive top and bottom line beats of analysts to the point maybe Wall Street analysts are bad at their jobs. You've got cloud revenue for all of these companies growing 20%-30%, and all are raising capital spending plans for 2026. Maybe not for the reason people are hoping, but big raises nonetheless, and yet the market reactions, we have Alphabet up 6%, Amazon's about down 1%, Microsoft down 4%, and Meta down a whopping 10% as we're recording. Jon, I'm going to go to you first. As far as what you saw, these similar reactions across the board, what were some of the big themes across all four that you saw?

Jon Quast: Well, for sure, three out of these four companies that you just mentioned, Tyler, are the large public cloud providers with Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet's Google Cloud. As you look at these three businesses, all three of them posting just massive growth, some of them acceleration on a scale that it's hard to comprehend. We're talking tens of billions of dollars added. You look at Microsoft Azure, for example, 39% year-over-year growth, but it's AI annual recurring revenue. That portion is up over 100% year over year to 37 billion, and you look at Amazon AWS, 28% growth. That's its best in over four years.

Then, here's the real surprising one: Alphabet's cloud revenue up 63% year over year. If that wasn't impressive enough, you have spending commitments, you have performance obligations. You have a backlog with this kind of a business, and Alphabet's backlog nearly doubled in a single quarter. We're talking a $460 billion backlog compared to 240 billion in the previous quarter. That tracks with what AWS is reporting, as well. It added 120 billion to its backlog in a single quarter. We're talking hundreds of billions of dollars added to future spending commitments for the public Cloud providers, and that is just massive.

Tyler Crowe: These have been walloping numbers, and as we were hinting at, this is Hidden Gem-style investing, and looking at the Magnificent Seven, the most probably well-known companies in the world, there always can be some misunderstood or hidden aspects of what is with these companies. Tom, I want to go to you and say, when you look at these four companies, differing reactions in the market for quarterly earnings, but on a long-term basis, they've all been incredible winners. When you see these four companies, what are some of the hidden aspects that you see or perhaps the misunderstood parts as you as an investor, looking at these and be like, you know, these market reactions are probably not what I'm seeing when I see these massive growth and spending backlogs.

Tom Gardner: Well, I think that the market is actually responding reasonably accurately, I think, at least in the short term, to what's playing out. Remember, as Jon pointed out, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, because their cloud businesses are racking up incredible backlog numbers, those backlogs are this is enterprise cloud revenue. This is very high-quality subscription revenue, and the demand for AI Enterprise right now is off the charts. Meanwhile, Meta does not have a cloud business and does not have backlog. Its business is advertisers, and advertisers can cancel in difficult economic times. The quality of the revenue across these businesses is very important to distinguish between the companies.

Then I will just add that the capex spend, so not only we're talking about the quality of the revenues, but the capex spend that is so dramatic, we're talking about these four companies collectively spending over $600 billion in capex this year. I've never seen anything like this in human history on this scale. But when we talk about Meta capex, they're spending again, against advertising markets where there are some real questions about consumer confidence; the consumer drives 70% of the U.S. economy. It's a very different thing that's developing at Microsoft, Amazon, and particularly Google right now, again, with that enterprise spend. When they spend capex at Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, they're trying to catch up to cloud demand. They're basically saying our numbers were lower than they should have been this quarter because we cannot meet the demand. The same is not true for Meta right now in their capex. They're spending more into zones of uncertainty out there.

I think the market reaction has been accurate and I will just say, again, the AI solutions is the primary driver. Let's take just Google Cloud. That's where the real business growth is. These are these enterprises across every industry now are racing to introduce AI solutions into their product solution suite in life. These are lucrative, resilient and very distributed spins for a company like Google. I'm not surprised to see the stock up here, and I think Google's business is looking very, very good today.

Tyler Crowe: I want to drill down into something that you talked about with capital spending, you know, over $600 billion for these four companies alone. If we extend out to the whole magnificent seven universe, we're talking almost three-quarters of $1 billion in annual capital spending on all of this. All these companies raised their capex spending for the year, but it wasn't because they're like, we need to build more. A lot of what they were saying they're raising it for was the prices of things are going way up. Jon, you mentioned in some of our show notes beforehand, like, memory costs are going way up, but it's all the downstream effects that we're seeing, talking about, even down to the electricians that are doing the installations and stuff like that. So I want to pose this to both of you, and I'll start with Tom, and then we'll go to Jon. When you see these massive raises in capital spending, do you see that as risks for the big spenders or opportunities as investors in those downstream companies that are building out the AI infrastructure?

Tom Gardner: Well, I do start by seeing incredible opportunities downstream. I mean, we're seeing the AI infrastructure build out, as you mentioned, the cost of memory rising, so companies like Micron, what an amazing stock it's been. I mean, this is a company that has been through incredible cycles in its history. It's now looking at evaluation in the hundreds of billions of dollars at Micron, so I really like to look downstream. There is a part of me that wonders when we're going to get some government intervention on the Mag 7 because these are truly some of the largest monopolies. They're competing with each other. They're also drawing a lot of free data from the general public, and I think there are going to be pressures coming to bear on some of the Mag 7 companies from a regulatory standpoint. Maybe, maybe not in the immediate future, but I mean, it's got to be coming.

But downstream in this capex spend, I mean, you have construction companies. You've got HVAC cooling. You have just tremendous opportunities in subcategories like photonics. These spends are going to have a dramatic impact downstream on companies that maybe they were somewhat flat-line businesses, and now the electrification boom is turning them into high-growth, margin-rising companies with rising returns on invested capital. I'm continuing to look downstream for investments. But I'd say out of the group that we've talked about so far, certainly, I'm most interested in Google coming out of these earnings.

Jon Quast: One of the interesting things here for me, Tyler is, yes, Amazon said, memory has skyrocketed. Meta pointed out that when it increased its guidance for capital expenditures, the majority of that is due to higher component pricing, particularly memory. Microsoft said that $25 billion was added to its capex, and a lot of that has to do with memory as well. You look at that and you start questioning, what does that mean? Counterintuitively, perhaps, this is actually good for the public clouds, and here's why. Dell has talked about how many of these large enterprises really want to try to control their cost more and bring some of the AI compute in house with on premise servers and things like that.

But when the component pricing is skyrocketing as it is, it actually can drive people to these public cloud companies. I think that's a lot of what we're seeing here in the incredible rise in the backlog. Some of these enterprises are saying, Man, maybe we can't do this on premise like we thought we could, and we're going to need more compute from these public Cloud companies. The higher memory costs and the higher component costs, yes, it does increase the capex, but perhaps it does make these public Cloud services even more attractive.

Tyler Crowe: I would love to drill down in this a little bit more, but we actually have that in our mailbag later on the thing. Coming up next, we're going to open up Tom's mystery topic of the day. Obviously, since we have the CEO of The Motley Fool with us here today, we gave him guest honors and said, since you are the guest, we wanted to leave it open to you and say, What direction do you want to go in, and we'll really go like, unscripted off the cuff. Tom, what is the mystery topic of the day?

Tom Gardner: The mystery topic of the day is consumer sentiment. When we look at the University of Michigan's consumer confidence scores, I mean, these are analyses across 600 households. Scoring system has gone back to 1952. We are at the lowest reading in history. Typically, this sentiment score might break down along political lines, but, of course, it's scoring income and age, and education, as well as key factors. Yet all categories are showing numbers at historic lows. The economy right now is being powered by supertech, and those large technology companies are also sending some signals to the marketplace by cutting the size of their workforce as they're growing, and you see Meta laying off 8,000 people and cutting back on 6,000 jobs it had listed while spending tens of billions of dollars in capex. The drive to AI compute is a much more aggressive spend in society than the drive for employment. We're just seeing that rippling in the white collar market right now, and large tech, but what's going to happen with the impact across the marketplace as this spreads out across every industry, and we see that AI tooling really does drive greater productivity gains, will deliver higher gross margins, higher operating margins, higher returns on capital for a lot of businesses.

But the question is, what will happen to the labor markets with all of these automations? We're all asking this question. It's showing up in the sentiment studies now by the University of Michigan. Consumer confidence is at historic lows. I would just say that we're in this zone today where we're getting almost true Prado principle on spending, where 20% of households are spending and are controlling 80% of the wealth in the U.S. My concern is what happens if the labor market begins to fall, because we obviously still have persistent inflation, a number of other, you know, gas prices on the rise with the conflict in Iran. The question that I ask is, what happens to the consumer that is driving 70% of U.S. GDP historically? I think these confidence numbers out of the University of Michigan are pretty concerning.

Tyler Crowe: One of the things that I have noticed, because in that similar vein that I've been following, if you watched the consumer sentiment survey for I don't know, probably maybe up until like four or five years ago, even or two or three, you could almost do an inverse correlation of consumer sentiment to gas prices, and it was like almost a perfect mirror. Rising gas prices, consumer sentiment would fall to the floor. It was only a couple years ago, again, when we started seeing a lot of this AI anxiety, I guess you could say in society of labor, consumer sentiment. You started to see this decoupling, where we would have relatively low gas prices, but consumer sentiment continued to decline.

It's been a fascinating, like, topic of how the number one, maybe gasoline is not like the end all be all price signal that people used to think of in terms of consumer anxiety anymore. Perhaps they are looking at other things like healthcare costs, insurance costs, a lot of the other things that have been rising at rates above inflation for quite some time, and yes, there's been relief elsewhere. A lot of durable goods. Prices have at least in terms of total spend, have gone down, but a lot of we call them the things in our lives that don't necessarily spark joy, like buying your health insurance or your housing, have gone up at rates disproportional to what we are normally used to. There's just this additional layer on top of what you're talking about, because you have jobs anxiety as well as the household no joy costs seem to be going up as well.

Jon Quast: I mean, certainly, Tyler, there is what we call nondiscretionary spending, right? That's what you're talking about. It doesn't necessarily bring us happiness, but we need to spend it to survive. We need to spend it just to live. However, I would say there's a lot of contradiction out there in the data. I mean, on one hand, we are seeing that the sentiment is low. I think that pessimism is high, and yet at the same time, you do see some non-discretionary spend continue to hold up quite good. Just as one case in point, look at Carvana, reporting yesterday after the bell, reporting a record number of cars sold. As I understand the used car market right now, prices aren't exactly great if you're a buyer. The financing terms aren't fantastic either. It's not necessarily an ideal market to have a sudden surge in used car purchase activity, and yet Carvana really knocking it out of the park with a number of vehicles sold. That would seem to contradict this low sentiment, and then buying cars, and then gas prices could continue to rise. That's always out there on the horizon. It's hard to know what to make of this exactly.

Tyler Crowe: When you see these signals, consumer anxiety, perhaps, like you said, going to Carvana, maybe used cars instead of new cars, and spending going to the unessential places, is that, to you, any signal in terms of, like, perhaps I want to be holding more cash in my portfolio for opportunities. Maybe some of my more highly valued companies. I'm going to take more look at perhaps trimming those. How does what we're talking about here, with a theme of consumer anxiety, low sentiment affect your portfolio and investing decisions?

Tom Gardner: Well, I think we always have to put things in the context of valuation. We have to remember, in some areas where there are declines or flattening out, maybe the valuations have moved below those realities, and now there's going to be a long-term opportunity to invest. But I would say that what we're looking at today is an enterprise world, that the safest places to invest right now are in the capex boom, the AI infrastructure boom, valuations are rich, but demand is unlimited. I would be looking at, the infrastructure buildout, B2B spending, enterprise-driven revenue. I think when we start moving into the category of the consumer and how the consumer will spend, if it's not just the risk the layoffs that we see coming through from large tech, right? Those are big headlines. We're all going to keep seeing because these companies are going to continue to remap their employment towards the automation that they're seeing. They're the most advanced technological companies in human history, and they're telling us. It's the canary and the coal mine. They are letting us know automation works. We're not going to need as many people on the payroll to complete massive amounts of work, right?

I think that is a headline signal that is causing the consumer to worry now, downstream of the large tech companies. If you have friends that have worked in some of these companies, you know that they had salaries in the couple hundred thousand dollars, and they've exit out to the marketplace, and they can't find comparable jobs at the same salary level. I think what we're going to see is increased caution in the consumers spend. I would be looking at anything that's discretionary, travel-related businesses, any big-ticket items, automobiles, big renovations. I think that what we're looking at is this bifurcation in wealth right now that is getting to somewhat extreme levels in the U.S. and around the world because of the technological boom. We have to begin looking at the health of the consumer and the companies that we're investing in that we're counting on those consumers to spend towards.

Jon Quast: One thing here that is somewhat related, we were talking about gas prices. It does not seem like the conflict in the Middle East is ending as quickly as everyone had hoped. It does seem like maybe the gas prices will stay higher for longer. That is interesting to what Tom was just talking about when it comes to travel. It does seem to there does seem to be some chatter that's starting around. What are my summer travel plans? Am I going over to Europe? Am I going overseas on a vacation, or am I staying here in the U.S. because of how high fuel prices are getting? Am I having more of a local vacation than a long-distance vacation? It does seem like that could be something to watch. Generally speaking, I don't make many changes in my portfolio based on, you know, kind of short-term data and how sentiment is because sentiment changes fast. But that's one thing that I am watching. What's going to happen with summer travel? I think that there could be some changes there.

Tom Gardner: Now, this may not be allowable in our format, but I would like to know what Tyler thinks, too.

Tyler Crowe: One of the things that I agree to a large extent on the downstream effects of the AI buildout that you were talking about, Tom, that seems to be the growth mega trend that is relatively immune to consumer sentiment because enterprise spending is going to be wholly tangential to what's happening on the consumer market. As far as, you know, consumer sentiment, one of the things that I, as an investor, tend to do in these situations is look a little bit like the Maslow's hierarchy of needs. When I do look at the consumer spending levels, it is going back down to the grocery stores of the world, the durable spendings, the Walmarts, the Targets, things like that, where the wallet share is going to be a bigger proportion there as people start to prioritize their spending in places like that. That seems to be the big trend that I would be focusing on in this in general.

But as to Jon's point, I'm not going to be making any drastic portfolio changes in the next couple of months, based on what we're seeing because to Jon's point, we could be moving along rather quickly in terms of sentiment. Coming up after the break, we're going to jump into the mailbag.

Hey, everyone. Thanks again so much for your questions. We really appreciate getting all of these. There's actually way more than we'd like to get to. Hopefully, we can start to whittle those down as our earnings season starts to wind down, as well. But if you do have a question for us, please email us at podcast@fool.com. That email podcast@fool.com. Two requests when asking any questions. Number one, keep it Foolish, and two, keep it short enough that we can read it on the air.

Today’s question comes from Tay Morglo, and it seemed very relevant considering our discussion about the Mag 7 earnings earlier today. Here's the question. Hi, Fools, so, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Tesla, and others have all made announcements over the last year about how they're creating their own chips so they can reduce reliance on Nvidia. Part of the both of thesis for Nvidia includes their outstanding margin because their chips are in such high demand. If all the bigger companies are going to be creating their own chips, and is this an existential threat to Nvidia over the long term? Thanks so much. I'm going to toss it to Jon first, and then, Tom, you go to have the concluding thoughts.

Jon Quast: It's the classic question regarding supply and demand, right? Let's look at net profit margin, net profit margin. It's at nearly 56% right now. That is absolutely world-class. If we realigned the clock five years ago, the profit margin now is about double what it was five years ago, and it was good five years ago. The question here from Tay is valid. There is extremely high demand for Nvidia’s products, and that is leading to historically world-class good profit margins. That's supply and demand at work. His question is basically, is this custom silicon coming in from these other tech giants? Is that going to bring balance to the market? Is supply now going to meet demand, and if it evens out, that would be bad for invidious profit margins.

To that question, I would say it's complicated. On one hand, it is logical to assume that if there are more custom silicon things coming in, that that is going to increase the supply, and it's going to then come into parity with demand. But there's a lot happening right now with AI that is continuing to boost that demand, and it's really hard to predict just how high it's going to boost it. But if you look at what is happening in the realm of agentic AI, we talked about Meta, we talked about Google, and we talked about Alphabet and Amazon, here's how many times they mentioned agent on the conference call for Microsoft 38, Meta 33 times, Alphabet 36, and Amazon 45. This is a huge thing, and it is actually accelerating the use of AI tokens.

For example, here's one of the things that Amazon said, Amazon bedrock, so this is one of its AI models. It processed more tokens in the first quarter than in all prior years combined. That's how much compute is the demand for AI compute is accelerating. On the one hand, there are more things coming into the market. On the other hand, the market is growing so fast that it's possible that this imbalance between supply and demand remains even with the newer entrants into the market. Moreover it's not necessarily unplug and Invidia GPU and just plug something else in. It's not that simple. There's a software component that goes with this. Nvidia CUDA software is very important. Really, what I think you're going to see is you're going to see these new products coming in, such as the TPUs and whatnot, they're going to be coming in handling some of the workload, but I don't think that that reduces Invidia's demand over the next several years, at least.

Tom Gardner: Well, I have so many things to respond to that I'm just going to extend today's podcast by 45 minutes. Thank you very much. It's so interesting to watch companies go through technical transformation. If you go back to when The Motley Fool was beginning, you really got an advantage if you were Internet native, right? If you didn't have to transition out of magazine, newspaper, print, big distribution, ink, all of a sudden, you're just native HTML, you're building right to the Internet.

The next stage would be native Cloud. Are you a Cloud native company? Do you have to migrate into the Cloud, move everything onto AWS, decide what to keep on premise, or can you just build clean in the Cloud? Companies that were doing that got a very big advantage. Now, the pace of this technical change is happening so quickly.It's how can you get to the next native environment as quickly as possible? You want to be AI native. Every company would wish right now that they were AI native with their workflows, 100% of workflows in AI, and we're very quickly moving to agent native, and how the proliferation and the demand here is it's beyond comprehension when looking at almost any other growth scenario in human history.

To that extent, this is why we see a $5 trillion market cap for Nvidia. The demand is massive. As Jon mentioned, they've locked in their clients with their CUDA software. Their software ecosystem is the one of the greatest competitive advantages in human history. You have enterprises, startups, governments, researchers, everyone is relying and they can't on Nvidia, and they can't spend $5 billion to build their own custom chip, right? The mass of the market is completely locked in with Nvidia.

However, the hyperscalers, the Googles, the Amazons, the Metas that are building their own chips. Amazon now has a run rate of $20 billion item for its internal chip business. What they're going to do is they're going to move their internal workloads, their repetitive AI workloads onto their own chips. This will place margin pressure on Nvidia because we're not talking about the hyperscalers just being some side businesses that aren't that important, right? They are significant. I do think we're going to see a flattening out of Nvidia's margins and their returns on invested capital.

Now, as Jon's pointed out, that comes against the tidal wave of demand everywhere else for what Nvidia has to offer. I would simply say that as an individual shareholder, and I'm sure most of our listeners here have individual shares of Nvidia and definitely have it in index funds, of course, the thing to look for in the business now is the direction of I would say gross margins, operating margins, return on assets, return on invested capital. Just see, are they losing? Is that rim of demand from the hyperscalers that they're now able to build their own custom chips to meet that internal work that they're doing? Is that going to start to impact margins? If we see any material margin declines, and then I think you need to start getting a little bit worried about the valuations for Nvidia. Obviously, Nvidia's business is going to be glowing for the next 10-plus years. The question is, the price we're paying for a share of Nvidia stock, tied to the historic margins and returns on capital. If those begin to diminish, then we could see some cap and some ceiling on Nvidia’s valuation.

But as far as I can see right now, I think Nvidia has rewarded its shareholders for so many good reasons. Jensen Wang is arguably the greatest leader in American history in business, and I don't see any reason to part ways with shares of Nvidia, but I would just be watching their margins and returns on capital and see what happens, particularly take a look, follow Amazon's chip business, and start to see what those impacts are on long-term margins for NVDA.

Tyler Crowe: Yeah, just my quick thought on it is it really does seem like a Rorschach test of how much do you see growth in AI capex spending? Because if it's going to remain incredibly high, then maybe not as much of an issue, because it's a little bit of the tide lifts all boats ways. Because, as we've said, throughout this entire podcast, demand right now is overwhelming. We could probably go, as Tom said, another 45 minutes. But he is a very busy man, and we need to give him back some of his time, and I think that's going to be all the time we have for today.

As always, people on the program may have the interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosures, please check out our show notes. Thanks for producer Dan Boyd and the rest of The Motley Fool team. For Tom, Jon, and myself, thanks for listening, and we'll chat again soon.

Jon Quast has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Tom Gardner has positions in Meta Platforms and Tesla. Tyler Crowe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Micron Technology, Microsoft, Nvidia, Target, Tesla, and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Kroger. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.