IBM's quantum processors delivered 34% better bond trading predictions for HSBC using over a million real trades from European markets.
Quantum computers are actually slower than classical systems, but they find hidden patterns in noisy financial data that regular computers can't detect.
This isn't quantum supremacy but something potentially more important for investors: proof that quantum computing can start generating business value very soon.
British mega-bank HSBC (NYSE: HSBC) just achieved something remarkable with quantum computers from IBM (NYSE: IBM) -- 34% better predictions in bond trading using real market data. The companies announced this result in separate press releases this week, referencing a joint research paper with the thrilling title "Enhanced fill probability estimates in institutional algorithmic bond trading using statistical learning algorithms with quantum computers."
That may sound drier than an Arizona doorknob, but it's actually kind of a big deal. This isn't another "quantum will change everything in 10 years" story -- IBM can deliver something modestly useful today.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
HSBC and IBM achieved significantly stronger prediction results on current quantum hardware, using data from over a million real trades. HSBC says they're "on the cusp" of actually using the underlying system in day-to-day operations.
Image source: Getty Images.
Here's what investors need to understand: This breakthrough isn't about quantum computers being faster (they're actually slower). Instead, IBM's quantum processors found hidden patterns in noisy market data that classical computers simply couldn't see. Think of it like classical computers seeing in black and white while quantum adds color -- you're not processing faster, but you're seeing things you couldn't before.
For IBM investors, this adds support for Big Blue's entire quantum strategy. While smaller specialists like Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) and IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) are still working to prove that their technology works at all, IBM just demonstrated real business value in partnership with a major bank. Their quantum-as-a-service model, where clients access quantum computers through the cloud, suddenly looks like a fairly near-term revenue stream rather than a costly science project.
But let's be realistic about what quantum can actually do today. There's clearly more work required before this technology earns its stripes as a cost-effective computing solution.
Financial researchers from HSBC put their heads together with quantum computing experts from IBM to build a clever hybrid system where quantum computers grab tons of financial data to do the deep analysis offline. The analysis involved overnight portfolio optimization, risk analysis between trading sessions, and finding new patterns in historical data. I'm talking about millions of real-world bond trades on European markets, analyzed months after the fact to see if the quantum computers could come up with accurate trade predictions.
In a production-level version of this research effort, the analysis would happen quickly, perhaps even with trading data as it happens, rather than looking back at older info. Then classical computers would step in to use these insights for real-time trading.
The quantum computer is like a brilliant strategist advising a fast executor. This architecture could work across many financial applications where better insights matter more than raw speed. To be clear, the HSBC and IBM research teams didn't brag about hyper-fast conclusions -- just high-quality predictions of future trades based on older data.
The investment implications are clear. IBM has moved quantum computing from laboratory curiosity to a potential business tool, though it's a specialized tool for specific problems, not a magic bullet. On the other side of the collaborative fence, HSBC could get a competitive advantage in trading and position itself as a tech-forward bank. Both companies would love to speed up the quantum computing analysis, generate even more accurate predictions, and make the whole system more cost-effective, of course. It's still a big baby step in the right direction.
Meanwhile, smaller quantum companies face pressure to show similar real-world results or risk being left behind.
In an unexpected turn of events, the quantum computer's "noise" -- usually considered a problem -- actually helped the researchers find better patterns in messy financial data. They don't fully understand why yet, noting that more research is required, but HSBC doesn't necessarily need to understand this effect before using it profitably. It doesn't take much of an edge to produce strong financial results when you operate on HSBC's massive scale.
For investors watching this space, the message is clear: quantum computing's revolution will be evolutionary, enhancing rather than replacing current systems. But that evolution is already underway, not in some distant future. The smart money should watch how quickly IBM can mirror this success in other areas -- credit risk, fraud detection, portfolio optimization -- where better pattern recognition beats pure number-crunching speed.
Quantum-based data analytics might never enter the arena of microsecond trade execution in real time, but that's OK. Good data can be more profitable than fast trades -- in the right hands.
This isn't the quantum supremacy moment where quantum computers overtake classical ones entirely. It's potentially more important for investors: the moment quantum computing starts making money for its end users (HSBC in this case).
Before you buy stock in International Business Machines, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and International Business Machines wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $652,872!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,092,280!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 189% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of September 22, 2025
HSBC Holdings is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Anders Bylund has positions in International Business Machines. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends International Business Machines. The Motley Fool recommends HSBC Holdings. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.