Honestly, the SpaceX Prospectus Is Far Worse Than I Imagined

Source Motley_fool

Key Points

  • Investor buzz is growing ahead of SpaceX's record-breaking initial public offering (IPO) on June 12, which combines two of Wall Street's hottest addressable markets: AI and the space economy.

  • SpaceX's valuation looks historically unjustifiable, while sales growth at AI start-up xAI is underwhelming.

  • Meanwhile, SpaceX's (perfectly legal) smoke-and-mirrors accounting can't mask substantial net losses.

  • These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›

Based on several reports, the largest initial public offering (IPO) in stock market history, SpaceX, is less than three weeks from becoming a reality.

Elon Musk's space and artificial intelligence (AI) conglomerate is seeking to raise approximately $75 billion and earn a $1.75 trillion valuation ahead of its expected June 12 debut. And thanks to recent rule changes by the Nasdaq exchange, SpaceX can be fast-tracked into the Nasdaq-100 after just 15 trading days.

Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

A toy rocket readying for launch atop messy stacks of coins and paperwork displaying financial data.

Image source: Getty Images.

Combining two of the hottest addressable markets on Wall Street -- the space economy and AI -- with Musk's track record of outsize returns (shares of Tesla have soared over 26,000% since their June 2010 IPO) clearly has investors excited. But one dive into SpaceX's prospectus (i.e., S-1 registration statement) should take the wind right out of its sails.

Admittedly, I wasn't a fan of the offering prior to its S-1 being made public. But the SpaceX prospectus is far worse than I could have imagined.

SpaceX's valuation is historically unjustifiable

For starters, history shows that every company at the forefront of a game-changing technology over the last three decades has topped out at a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio between 30 and 45 (with a little wiggle room at both ends). The key point being that P/S ratios above 30 for companies on the leading edge of Wall Street's hottest trends aren't sustainable.

SpaceX generated consolidated sales of $18.67 billion in 2025. If it snags a $1.75 trillion valuation, it would be trading at a P/S ratio of almost 94. Even at its roughly $1.5 trillion market cap on private-market trading platforms, its P/S ratio is still over 80.

An engineer checking wires and switches on a data center server tower.

Image source: Getty Images.

Where's the growth at xAI?

Perhaps the wildest realization from SpaceX's prospectus is that xAI, the AI start-up responsible for building and training large language model Grok, which has a total addressable market of $26.5 trillion (including AI infrastructure), per the prospectus, is apparently getting its lunch eaten by OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI start-ups.

According to CNBC, Anthropic is on pace for $10.9 billion in second-quarter sales after generating $4.8 billion in the first quarter. While Anthropic is delivering triple-digit sequential sales growth, SpaceX's first-quarter sales were $818 million -- up just 12.5% from the comparable period last year.

Even though Anthropic and SpaceX agreed to a compute partnership that'll see the former pay the latter $1.25 billion per month, Anthropic (or SpaceX) can terminate the deal with a mere 90-day notice.

SpaceX's smoke-and-mirrors accounting is an eyesore

Lastly, SpaceX's financial statements contained a lot of perfectly legal accounting gymnastics to mask an ugly bottom line.

In particular, the prospectus points to the company's steady string of positive adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of the sustainability of its multiple operating segments. But there's a milewide gap between the $6.58 billion in positive adjusted EBITDA reported in 2025 and the actual $4.94 billion net loss SpaceX recognized.

Depreciation and amortization from its capital expenditures-heavy approach, coupled with close to $2 billion in share-based compensation, collectively bridge $8.65 billion of this gap between adjusted EBITDA and net loss.

SpaceX isn't close to being profitable, yet it profiles as possibly the most expensive megacap stock on Wall Street.

Where to invest $1,000 right now

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 986%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500.

They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 26, 2026.

Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Nasdaq. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
goTop
quote