In this podcast, Motley Fool analyst Asit Sharma and host Mary Long discuss:
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
A full transcript is below.
Before you buy stock in Circle Internet Group, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Circle Internet Group wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $950,198!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
This podcast was recorded on June 25, 2025.
Mary Long: Cruise stocks catch a wave. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. I'm Mary Long, joined today by Mr. Asit Sharma. Asit, great to see you. It is truly a pleasure to have you here today.
Asit Sharma: Same, Mary, I am truly honored to be with you today.
Mary Long: Here we go. Please honored all good vibes today. Before we dive into some deeper stories later on in the show, we're going to highlight some of today's headlines up top. So, Asit, we're going to start with some macro stories and then dive a bit deeper into some company specific news. First big thing that we're keeping an eye on is that the S&P and NASDAQ both closed at their highest points since February, leaving both indexes hovering around record highs, largely on the news of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. There are reports that fighting continues, but investors seem to be betting on peace. You got oil futures falling on the Ceasefire announcement. Gold moved in a similar direction, dropping to a two week low. You also have another part of the economy that's moving in a different direction. The housing market is falling from its pandemic highs. Data from the latest S&P index reports that home prices rose just 2.7% in April. That's down from their 3.4% gain in March. Redfin says sellers outnumber buyers 3-1 in this market and predicts that prices could slip 1% by late 2025. Asit, I think you want to double click on the housing market story. Anything you want to add there, give us a little bit of color.
Asit Sharma: Mary, this is an industry at the end of the day that is a supply and demand story. I think what we saw in the great financial crisis back in 2008, 2009, really put a stick in the story that house prices will always rise inexorably and be a great investment that's been challenged during the pandemic. We saw the reverse occur. Now here we are, where the economy is slowing down. There's a lot of uncertainty. Tariffs are a big story. Interest rates are still stubbornly high, people aren't earning as much. We see this outnumbering of sellers to buyers. What does this mean to me? Well, one thing it means is that lots of people have lots of equity tied up in their homes. On the other side of the coin, there aren't as many people now in this economy who are able and willing to buy those houses, so it becomes a little bit of a buyer's market when the sellers aggregate. I don't doubt that we could start to see prices slip by late this year. Historically, when you look at all the data we have that goes back, an enormously long period, it is unusual for house prices to fall, but we may be in that situation again, so keep an eye on that.
Mary Long: Earnings are slowing down, but we did get news from Carnival cruise lines yesterday, and as a result of its results, the stock was up 7% yesterday after market close. The company tripled its net income and raised its guidance. It expects adjusted net income to be 40% higher than last year at the end of the fiscal year. Asit, what stuck out to you in these results?
Asit Sharma: I think, for me, the thing that sticks out for Carnival in general over the last several quarters is the way that they have managed and boosted their yields. So all of their ships, they've decreased the ships supply in the past few years. They do a really good job of marketing, so they're getting more yield per marketing dollar. I think this whole strategy that Carnival has had of acquiring these small islands and making them destination places. The experience isn't all about the cruising has really resonated with cruisers out in the larger world. Many things they have done right. The other thing that really popped out at me this quarter is the amount that they're now spending on the interest that service their debt is less than it was just a few years ago. I think their long term debt peaked at around $32 billion, I think in 2023, and it's roughly $25 billion today. When you look at the commensurate effect of the interest expense on that debt, that's like half a billion dollars to the bottom line that they can add, and those over 12 month period. Those numbers really start to make the net income look a lot juicier if you're a long term shareholder. Paying down the debt, cutting the number of ships they have, having these destinations to drive interest and drive the yields, all these things together, just make a picture of a well run carnival cruise line. I think last point, CEO Josh Weinstein has done a tremendous job putting this company back on track.
Mary Long: It's not news for me to say that the word of the year certainly seems to be uncertainty. That's in regard to the economy, to geopolitics, any field you name it. Because of that, a person could be forgiven for thinking, hey, in an uncertain environment, people aren't going to be going on vacation as much. They aren't going to be tightening their wallets. Carnival doesn't seem to be facing that issue. In fact, Josh Weinstein seemed very enthusiastic and excited that people are getting great value out of their cruises. Why do cruise stocks tend to rise even when consumers start tightening their wallets?
Asit Sharma: Consumers tend to fool themselves in one sense, which is if you're looking at a vacation which is all inclusive, many of us trick ourselves into thinking, that's all that we're going to spend on that vacation. Cruise lines historically have enjoyed some periods where we've seen uncertainty in the economy, even a slight recessionary trend, where consumers will drop down from multi component vacation, so you're renting a car. You are staying in hotels, you're booking air flights to this one thing that if you book in the right time during booking season, you can get at a massive discount. Now, carnival is very savvy. Once you get there, they're really good at extracting your dollars anyway, but this is a lure for the general person out there in the economy who's starting to struggle a bit as a way to maybe make sure that they can stay within budget. Doesn't always happen. But this is part of the up and down momentum of this industry. Surprisingly, bad times can be good for the cruise line.
Mary Long: Bad times can be good for the cruise line. Does that mean that you, Asit Sharma, plan to catch a ride with any cruise ship stocks? Why fall on that side of the coin?
Asit Sharma: I am still trying to get some racks put on the top of my car for some kayaks we have that are sitting there very appealing. I want to get out on those kayaks at a local lake in Raleigh, North Carolina this summer.
Mary Long: Well, that's very different than a cruise so yes to kayaks, but it sounds like no, you're not [inaudible] ships.
Asit Sharma: Cruise you're not [inaudible] of Lake Johnson.
Mary Long: It sounds like no, Asit is not a fan of adding cruise ship stocks to his portfolio. Already, with that, we're going to take a quick break. Later on in the show, we'll be talking stablecoins and the luxury watch market. Asit, Circle Internet Group has been on a tear since going public earlier this month. Circle is the company behind USDC. That's the second largest stable coin by market share. So a stable coin is a token that's backed by an equivalent dollar denominated asset. Before we get to Circle's rise, and in more recent days, it's slight fall, what is behind all of this interest recently in stablecoins?
Asit Sharma: One of the things that stablecoins bring to the market is an avoidance of the fees that we pay to networks such as Visa and Mastercard when transactions are made. And most of the time, the merchant bears the brunt of those fees, but what do they usually do? Mary, they pass them on to you and me. And as time goes on, sometimes you even see that as broken out as a surcharge in certain service areas. The lure of the block chain didn't really pull a lot of retail interest in where transactions were concerned because of so many digital assets that came and went, there was fraud associated with some crypto assets over the last several years.
But the idea of a stablecoin, which is backed in many cases by reserves of currency, pegged to a currency like the US dollar and perhaps regulated, as we see with the Genius Act, which has been the news lately, that's starting to pull in more interest. Also, I think the technology of stablecoins has improved over the last few years. We saw Circle announce a partnership with Fiserv which is a really large payment processing company. You see many strands of the story starting to come together that we could have a viable alternative to some of the established payment systems that have been around for decades. Hence, this explosion in retail stock interest, for those of you who follow circle on the stock market, a recent IPO, I'm sure you have seen how this stock has exponentially enjoyed SIM interest. I'll put it politely there. Whether it stays up in that stratospheric level is another question.
Mary Long: To put some numbers behind those adjectives, Circle stock soared 168% on its first day of trading alone. It continued to rise in the weeks following. I think at its highest point, it was 700 and it had grown 750%. It's dipped a bit back down over the past few days. But, Asit, we're long term investors here, so let's zoom out and think not about what might happen over the next month, but maybe over the next five years. Where do you think Circle stock will be about five years from now?
Asit Sharma: It's hard to say, of course, I'm going to hedge outright, Mary always do that. But I will take a bit of a stand here. I think this company has some potential because the market is so vast. When you think about transaction volumes for Visa and Mastercard, those are in the trillions every year, trillions of dollars crossing those platforms. Even getting a slice of that would be a substantial win for a business like this. What do they have to do to get there? They've got to have full transparency. To be this very easily defined and easily followed entity, they've got to comply with regulatory bodies around the world. They have to scale and be liquid at the same time, so they need a lot of capital to do this. They've got to seal a lot of deals with companies like Fiserv. In addition to sovereign body licenses, they have to wheel and deal out in the marketplace.
But if you can do that, the market is there for an alternative to current payment systems. I should say, this is also an alternative to slower moving systems like ACH payments and some peer to peer payments. We've got a story which could emerge, but we're going to have to follow the execution on so many fronts that I just mentioned for that story to pan out where this becomes a really valuable company. But I'm seeing all this just for some investors who might dismiss this company out of hand, just seeing it's almost meme stock like movement since the IPO. That doesn't mean that this can't be a good business off the different networks. When you look around this landscape, this company, in particular, stands out for the effort it's put in to show it is compliance minded. It is reserve fund minded. It wants to be known as the most legit of these networks. It's got some potential over the long term.
Mary Long: Thinking of the broader landscape of this space, a name that a lot of investors are probably pretty familiar with is Coinbase. How is what circles doing different than what Coinbase is, and maybe where do these crypto adjacent companies overlap?
Asit Sharma: I think Coinbase is a company that's just benefiting from the general rise in digital assets. It's a trading platform. Mary, it is a company that rises when volumes of different coins rise. That's a really good place to be in this whole ecosystem. A company like Circle, may make it. It may not. It may be usurped by an even better competitor or regulations may change, or the demand for this may decrease. I'll give you one great example of how this could happen. Although it is blockchain based, we still don't have really great mechanisms for fraud prevention, the way that like Mastercard does or Visa or American Express. These companies that have been around for a long time and have made huge investments in their payment services. The rigidity and structure and backbone of these networks are yet to be proven. Whereas coinbase is over here just being a middleman, a broker. I always like those businesses because as long as there's trading, they'll find a way to make money, whether they're selling order flow, whether they're making it on the transaction, whether they are making it on the spread of holding assets and making interest off those assets. There's so many ways for a middleman like coinbase to make money. If you ask me, right now, which is going to be around in five or 10 years with a higher probability, I would say coinbase. Both can succeed in this environment, but they are different. They don't at this point, have a lot where they have confluence in the things they do.
Mary Long: We'll close out with a story that I really wanted to be sure to hit on with you, Asit, because you and I have talked about the luxury goods market before, and I came across a fascinating story in the Walls troop Journal the other week that I thought you'd have some really interesting takes on. This one is about an American fund manager named Stephen Wood, who's taken a 0.5% stake in the Swiss watch company Swatch. He was gunning ultimately unsuccessfully, but he was gunning earlier this year for a board seat at the company, and Wood's hope is for Swatch to capitalize on its highest end brands to lean into its luxury offerings. I'm going to link to this article in the show notes because I think the listeners would be really fascinated at this just like this wild look at business strategy and family dynamics. There's a lot to unpack there. But we'll focus on Swatch, the company for now. Swatch currently owns 16 brands across various price points. You can get Brugue for almost $44,000, whereas a Swatch watch could run as low as $40. What do you think of this play, Asit? Do you like it, or do you see it more as an example of diversification?
Asit Sharma: It might be dears vacation, Mary. It might be too little too late. I like that 0.5% stake. If he can get up to 1%, he might have some more say and maybe got a seat on the board. But Swatch is a business which was in currency years and years ago, decades ago actually was when I think it was at its brand peak. That would have been a great time to capitalize on that brand and to offer some super luxury items, attract the massively affluent who also loved the watches that were going for whatever it was at that time, probably $30. Inflation adjusted. But I'm not so sure that's a great strategy today because the brand doesn't have the cachet simply put, and this is a business which has stalled in its revenue growth. I do think that Swatch is making a little bit of a comeback. I notice some of the younger generation now are starting to wear Swatches you see them more in circulation than in the past, so that's good for the brand.
Asit Sharma: But trying to do this barbell strategy with this type of brand, which has been around the block, I think that's difficult. I'm going to say it's a do worse idea than maybe others would have. We'll see. I never want to count an enterprising entrepreneur out, but I'm skeptical.
Mary Long: You're not the only person that's skeptical. 27% of Swatch shares are short interest. Net profit fell 78% last year. I asked you the five year question on our last story. I'll ask you for this one, as well. Where do you see Swatch going in five years time?
Asit Sharma: This is a business that can plod along, maybe meet the market or hang out with the market. The one thing to remember about Swatch is that it's got a really strong balance sheet. It doesn't have much in the way of long term liabilities, and it's got a really, great haul of current assets. It's something like 10 billion Swiss francs in current assets. Now about 7.6 billion of that is Swatch inventory, but the company turns its inventory over pretty regularly. This isn't a company that is just about to collapse. I think with a little bit of, brand revival, they will plod along. Do I see them outgunning the market and maybe suddenly catching fire? I don't know. I will say this, before we head out. I did actually buy a Swatch in an airport for my wife last year, simply because at one point in our illustrious career as a couple, we were too poor to afford what was then, Married probably that $30 Swatch price point. We happen to see this really beautiful store in the Istanbul airport. And I was very surprised at the number of Swatches that they have now. It's an explosion of color and lots of different styles. Maybe they'll catch fire with something, but I don't see this being an alternative to some other of the really higher end luxury companies you and I have talked about that make for better long term investments.
Mary Long: I was going to say, you keep an eye on the luxury goods market. Is there a company that comes to mind that has already caught fire or that you think could continue to do so in the future that plays in the luxury space?
Asit Sharma: Well, I've been talking up Ferrari for the last couple of weeks. I've been looking at symbol R-A-C-E. The thing that is really dawning on me over time is how well they sell into demand and how disciplined they are in restricting their output. I noticed just for fun, internally here at The Motley Fool, we have something called the Fool's errand, where we award randomly through a game that we play every month, some time off to valued Fool members. This month's theme was Ferrari, and our team did a great job of explaining that business model much better than I did on Motley Fool Money last week. But I will say that is catching my eye as a company that's going to benefit from the tailwinds of the F1 interest that's growing, and also just the amount that they spend in R&D research and development. They really love engineering. It's an engineering first company. Sometimes what propels a brand isn't really about status, but it's about the product itself, and they've always kept their eye close to that.
Mary Long: That's about all the time that we've got for today. Asit, thanks so much for spending the morning with me here on Motley Fool Money. Always appreciate having you on.
Asit Sharma: Always a pleasure, Mary. Thanks so much.
Mary Long: Before we go, a quick programming note that this will be one of my last shows hosting Motley Fool Money. Working on this show each day for the past few years has truly been a highlight of my career. My favorite part of this job is that I get to read articles and books and go down rabbit holes every day and then have conversations that help me to better understand the world. I have learned so much, and it's my hope that by virtue of listening, you feel that you have too.
I don't know exactly what comes next, but I do know that I plan to continue podcasting. If you want to see what I'm up to, LinkedIn is the best spot to find me. Until then, thank you. To each of you who have listened to Motley Fool Money for the gift of your time and your attention. I hope you feel that it was well spent and that you're a little smarter, happier, and richer because of it. I also can't go without giving a very special thank you to the Motley Fool Money team. That's Chris Hill, Dylan Lewis, Ricky Mulvey, Rick Engdahl, Dan Boyd, Tim Sparks, and all the wonderfully smart and kind and funny analysts that are regulars on the show. You all are the epitome of foolishness. What a gift it's been to work with each and every one of you. Until next time, Fool on.
As always, people in the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. Don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards, and I'm not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For Motley Fool Money, I'm Mary Long. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.
American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Asit Sharma has positions in Mastercard. Mary Long has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Mastercard and Visa. The Motley Fool recommends Carnival Corp., Coinbase Global, and Redfin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.