SB Financial (SBFG) Earnings Call Transcript

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DATE

Friday, October 31, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. ET

CALL PARTICIPANTS

Chairman, President, and CEO — Mark A. Klein

Executive Vice President and CFO — Anthony V. Cosentino

Executive Vice President — Steven A. Walz

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

TAKEAWAYS

• Net Income -- $4 million, with diluted earnings per share of $0.64, up 83% from the prior-year quarter; adjusted EPS, excluding servicing rights impairment, was $0.68.
• Tangible Book Value Per Share -- Ended the period at $17.21, a 4.4% increase; excluding acquisition costs, up 8.9%.
• Net Interest Income -- $12.3 million, rising over 21% from $10.2 million in the prior year and accelerating at a 30% annualized pace from the linked quarter.
• Loan Growth -- Increased by $80.6 million, or 7.8%, marking the sixth straight quarter of sequential growth.
• Deposit Growth -- Rose by $103 million, or 9%, with $51 million attributable to Marblehead integration; organic deposit growth was 4.5%.
• Assets Under Care -- Surpassed $3.5 billion, comprising $1.5 billion in bank assets, $1.5 billion in residential servicing, and more than $60.563 billion in wealth assets.
• Mortgage Originations -- $67.6 million, lower than both prior-year and linked quarters, yet year-to-date residential loan originations increased 9% and residential loan sale gains improved 13%.
• Operating Expenses -- Decreased by 3% sequentially; year-to-date expense growth, excluding merger cost, was 9.5% versus revenue growth of 18.5%, reflecting 3.5 times operating leverage this quarter.
• Asset Quality -- Charge-offs returned to 0 basis points after 2 basis points previously; nonperforming assets totaled $4.9 million, and criticized/classified loans declined to $5.8 million from $7.2 million sequentially.
• Allowance for Credit Losses -- Stood at 1.44% of total loans, providing 345% coverage of nonperforming assets.
• Noninterest Income -- $4.2 million, increasing 2.9% year over year but declining 15.9% sequentially, with $460,000 of servicing rights impairment accounting for 60% of the decrease from the linked quarter.
• Title Revenue -- Year-to-date contribution up $400,000, or 32%, with internal referrals providing 28% of total title company revenue.
• Net Interest Margin -- 3.48% for the period, described as the likely "peak," with management projecting it will hold near this level through 2026.
• Loan-to-Deposit Ratio -- Consistent at 88%, with a target in the low- to mid-90% range.
• Share Repurchase -- 101,000 shares repurchased during the period at just under $20 per share; year-to-date repurchases total 252,000 shares using 45% of earnings.
• Dividend Declared -- $0.0155 per share, equating to a 3.1% yield and 24% payout ratio; marks the 13th consecutive annual increase.
• Marblehead Integration -- Finalized customer system conversion on Oct. 24, adding nearly 2,500 deposit accounts with a weighted average cost of 1.2%.
• Liquidity -- Immediate access to $190 million in FHLB capacity and $500 million of contingent funding; wholesale borrowings of $35 million at low-4% average coupon.
• Expense Outlook -- Q4 expenses expected in line with Q3's $11.15 million, with management projecting 3% to 4% expense growth pace for 2026.
• Mortgage Pipeline -- $37 million at period end, with 30% attributed to refinance activity.
• Commercial Real Estate (CRE) Concentration -- CRE constitutes less than half of total loans outstanding and equals 203% of regulatory capital, stated as below peer benchmarks.
• Agricultural Loan Portfolio -- Stable at $65 million, with a stated goal to expand to $100 million in the next year through newly added talent.

SUMMARY

SB Financial Group (NASDAQ:SBFG) reported marked improvements in profitability and tangible book value following successful Marblehead integration and continued disciplined growth in commercial and residential lending. Management noted ongoing margin strength and controlled expenses while planning to deploy liquidity toward further loan growth in competitive markets. The company signaled stable funding costs, proactive credit management, and targeted growth initiatives in both urban and agricultural markets for sustained performance into 2026.

• Management expects loan growth to remain at high single digits in 2026, funded through bond portfolio runoff, 4% to 5% deposit growth, and selective wholesale borrowings.
• The CFO said, "We believe that this quarter will likely represent the low point on funding costs as well as the peak in our net interest margin," indicating a stable margin outlook with some upward potential if liquidity is redeployed.
• Commercial loan pipelines contain approximately $40 million in unfunded commitments expected to be funded over the next 6 to 12 months, supporting forecasted portfolio expansion.
• SB Financial plans to slow the share repurchase program to preserve capital for potential future transactions while maintaining regulatory capital strength.
• Year to date, nearly $1 million in provision was set aside, with allowance coverage for nonperforming assets projected to increase above 400% if asset quality targets are met.
• Leadership highlighted a "hybrid office model" according to Mark A. Klein initiative and strategic staffing adjustments intended to control expenses and enhance operational efficiency in existing and new markets.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

• Marblehead: Acquired bank subsidiary integrated into SB Financial Group's core operations during the period.
• FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank, a key contingent liquidity provider for regional banks.
• OMSR: Originated mortgage servicing rights; intangible assets representing the value of servicing rights retained by the bank when originating and selling mortgage loans.
• CRE: Commercial real estate loans, including lending secured by income-producing properties.
• CECL: Current expected credit loss, an accounting standard for estimating allowances for potential loan losses.
• AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income, reflecting unrealized gains/losses impacting equity but not earnings.
• NPAs: Nonperforming assets; loans or properties where payments are overdue or unlikely to be collected as scheduled.
• Loan-to-Deposit Ratio: Ratio expressing total loans relative to total deposits, a measure of balance sheet liquidity and risk.
• Beta (Deposit Beta): Sensitivity of deposit rates to changes in benchmark market interest rates.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Mark A. Klein: Thank you, Sarah, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to our third quarter 2025 conference call and webcast. The third quarter reflected steady execution across our business lines and continued stability in our core markets and concentrated growth and expansion wins. I'm pleased to report that the integration of the head clients was successfully completed this past weekend. We welcome and value them as they are a key ingredient in our strategy to further leverage our community bank brand. We're also preparing to descend upon a new adjacent market just to our west into Napoleon, Ohio, and Henry County.

We are clearly excited about the potential of this market and especially the $800 million in deposits in the market we intend to aggressively pursue. Throughout the quarter, we maintained our focus on disciplined lending, core deposit growth, and careful expense management. While the operating environment remains competitive, we believe our balance sheet, lines of business, credit quality, and a growth mindset position us well for the final quarter of the year. Some highlights for the quarter include net income of $4 million with diluted earnings per share of $0.64, up $0.29 or approximately 83% compared to the prior year quarter. When considering the servicing rights impairment, adjusted EPS was $0.68 for the quarter.

This was our fifty-ninth consecutive quarter of profitability. Tangible book value per share ended the quarter at $17.21, up from $16.49 last year, or a 4.4% increase. Excluding the acquisition payment for Marblehead, tangible book value per share is up 8.9%. Net interest income totaled $12.3 million, an increase of over 21% from the $10.2 million in 2024. From the linked quarter, net interest income accelerated at a 30% annualized pace.

Anthony V. Cosentino: Loan growth over the prior year quarter was approximately $80.6 million or 7.8% and now marks the sixth consecutive quarter of sequential loan growth. Deposits grew by nearly $103 million or 9%, inclusive of the $51 million in deposits related to Marblehead. The deposit base and relationships from Marblehead have remained largely intact since the financial merger in January. When we exclude the Marblehead deposits, overall deposit growth was still healthy at 4.5%. Assets under our care continue to grow and now exceed $3.5 billion, consisting of bank assets of $1.5 billion, a residential servicing portfolio of $1.5 billion, and now wealth assets of over $60.563 billion.

Once again, this diverse book of assets provides stability across market cycles and continues to position us well for performance enhancement heading into 2026 and beyond. Mortgage originations for the quarter were $67.6 million, down from both the prior year and linked quarters. However, our pipeline has strengthened a bit with the thirty-year rate at or below the 6% level for most of this past month. We are well-positioned to recapture market growth with our 23 lenders positioned all across the Midwest in Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Columbus, and Northwest Ohio. As rates decline, operating expenses decreased to approximately 3% from the linked quarter and up slightly compared to the prior year.

Year-to-date expense growth, excluding the one-time merger cost, was 9.5%, well below the 18.5% year-to-date revenue growth. This acceleration of revenue over line item expenses represents an operating leverage of now 3.5 times this quarter and 1.8 times for the year through three quarters. Asset quality continues to be one of our competitive advantages. Charge-offs returned to more historic levels, and we successfully eliminated nearly $1.3 million in nonperforming loans from the linked quarter by way of payoffs and upgrades.

Mark A. Klein: In ClearSight, we continued the relentless pursuit of our five key initiatives. And I'll remind you: growth and diversity of revenue, organic growth for greater scale to improve efficiency, deepening client relationships for greater scope and more services per household, excellence in operational activity, and, of course, top-tier asset quality. A little closer look at revenue, diversity, and growth. Mortgage originations remained fairly consistent during the third quarter and continued to show solid improvement from earlier in the year. Total production was approximately $68 million, as I mentioned, just slightly below the level recorded in the same quarter last year.

While we have been disappointed overall in the residential market this year, our ability to generate residential real estate loans across our footprint still improved by 9% over year-to-date 2024. As a result, we have improved our residential loan sale gains now by 13% over the prior year to date. That said, we are absent from any meaningful refinance volume thus far in 2025. This quarter continued our trend of purchase and construction loans. Year to date, we have completed over 80% of our volume in purchase and approximately 7% from construction. Throughout nine months, we have done just $7 million in refinancing our own book.

As a result, our servicing rights have increased by nearly $1 million or 7% and are providing an additional $175,000 in annual revenue for 2025. Noninterest income was up 2.9% from the prior year quarter at $4.2 million and down 15.9% from the linked quarter. The increase from 2024 was driven by increased mortgage servicing rights as well as increased title service fees and other fee-based business line revenue. From the linked quarter, we saw a reduction due to the $460,000 servicing rights impairment that accounted for approximately 60% of the decline. Title has continued to be a bright spot in our fee income suite thus far in 2025.

The revenue contribution is up nearly $400,000 or 32% on a year-to-date basis. These results are especially meaningful given that our mortgage value is up just 9% year to date. Peak has expanded their customer base well beyond State Bank, and our commercial lenders have consistently increased their referrals. In fact, year to date, our internal referrals have provided our title company with 28% of their total revenue. Our wealth group is transitioning to a new strategic partnership with Advisory Alpha that we mentioned in prior quarters.

This will enable us to bring an expanded suite of marketing materials to the table and, most importantly, a number of CFP professionals that will be an added benefit to our current and future clients while strengthening our high-touch brand. Over the coming quarters, we intend to expand on the impact this strategic partnership will have on our client base. On the scale front, during the third quarter, we continued to make solid progress integrating the Marblehead team into our organization. Their staff has blended well with our State Bank team, and we've been very encouraged by their continued success in retaining longstanding client relationships and maintaining strong community ties.

We also recently completed the integration of Marblehead's customers into our core system on October 24, marking the final step in aligning operations and technology across our combined organization. This acquisition, while small, has enabled us to enter a new market and add nearly 2,500 deposit accounts with a weighted average cost of approximately 1.2%. As I mentioned earlier, deposit growth both with and without Marblehead has been a strong contributor to our earnings in 2025. We have been able to keep most of our excess deposit liquidity, which has averaged approximately $75 million invested overnight, expanding margin revenue.

As rates are expected to further decline in the coming quarter, we will be utilizing this liquidity to fund our solid loan pipelines across our footprint. Again, we have grown loans now for six consecutive quarters, with the annual growth rate of 7.8% well in line with our historical averages of high single digits. We understand that the majority of the growth has occurred in the Columbus market and in the commercial real estate product line. However, even with the impact of that somewhat lopsided growth over the past four to five quarters, Columbus represents just 40% of our loan balances and CRE is now less than half our total outstandings.

Additionally, CRE is in our loan portfolio and contributes and constitutes just 203% of regulatory capital, which is well below peer and well within regulatory benchmarks. Expanding relationships or more scope Our focus on relationship banking continues to guide how we serve and grow our franchise. We remain committed to understanding the needs of our customers and delivering the right mix of products and services to support them through various economic conditions. As part of that commitment, we've continued to refine and expand our hybrid office model that combines personalized end-market service with flexible digital and remote engagement. This approach has strengthened connectivity with clients while helping to enhance efficiency across our footprint.

We remain dedicated to this model in our new markets of Angola, Indiana, and soon-to-be Napoleon, Ohio, and have begun retrofitting several of our existing offices to better align resources with current levels of activity. As we disclosed in prior quarters, our markets have experienced disruption from mergers and acquisitions. We have been opportunistic in pursuing clients of the disruptive competitors but most importantly, been able to add depth to our business development teams, and in our urban markets and in our agricultural lending business line. All of these changes have been part of a concerted effort to be present and available in each of our communities. There is still a significant level of business activity in our legacy markets.

And as client rub heightens, we feel we are well-positioned to leverage our main street banking model with newly acquired talent to drive our acquisition of both loans and deposits higher. Referrals remain a key element in our quest to deepen existing client relationships. Year to date, we have now initiated over 1,100 referrals to business partners with 557 closing for approximately $62 million in additional business for our company.

Steven A. Walz: Operational excellence. A major focus for us throughout this year has been the acquisition and integration of Marblehead clients, employees, and community. We achieved the financial close of the transaction five months after the announcement and customer conversion nine months after the financial close. Despite the speed of those transitions, we have had little to no customer attrition, and the client-facing staff are here today taking care of their long-term clients. Our integration team has built a process and structure that will allow us to compete and complete future transactions quickly and efficiently. As we indicated last quarter, we believe that agricultural lending opportunities have begun to expand in our markets.

In fact, we recently added another experienced lender in the ag production sector and will undoubtedly allow us to solicit a number of well-established ag production relationships across the Tri-State region. Our balances have been steady at $65 million for some time, but our commitment and renewed emphasis are intended to deliver us a $100 million portfolio a year from now.

Mark A. Klein: Finally, asset quality. We continue to reveal a high level of asset quality metrics as with prior quarters. I mentioned, charge-offs fell to zero basis points from just two basis points in the second quarter. Non-performing assets totaled $4.9 million. We remain focused on maintaining our strong asset quality as demonstrated by the continued management of our criticized and classified loans, which stood at $5.8 million, down from $7.2 million in the linked quarter. Our allowance for credit losses remained robust at 1.44% of total loans, not providing 345% coverage of non-performing assets. We did make real tangible progress to reduce non-performing loans this quarter, but we still have room for improvement.

In fact, our top quartile performing peer group has been consistently 10 to 15 basis points lower than us on this ratio. We do feel that we have additional opportunities to reduce it further and are targeting a 25 basis point level of NPAs in the coming quarters. Now I'll turn it over to Tony for additional comments on our quarterly performance. Tony?

Anthony V. Cosentino: Thanks, Mark. Good morning, everyone. Let me outline some additional highlights and details of our third quarter results. Starting with the income statement, in the third quarter, operating revenue increased to $16.6 million, a 15.9% rise from the $14.3 million in the prior year and a 3.5% decrease from the linked quarter. Net interest income growth was and has been the main driver, with it reaching $12.3 million in the quarter, up 21%. Loan income topped $16 million for the second consecutive quarter, reflecting our higher level of outstandings and the contractual repricing of the portfolio.

Loan yields in the quarter reached a new high of 5.95%, up 23 basis points, and as a direct result, pushed our earning asset yield up 18 basis points to 5.31%. Year-to-date ROA was 90 basis points, up 17%, with our pre-tax pre-provision ROA at 1.29%, a 28 basis point improvement over the 2024 third quarter year-to-date performance. Despite the growth in the balance sheet and the need to fund our earning asset growth, funding costs have been very stable. Total interest expense for the quarter of $6.5 million was up just $113,000, less than 2% from the prior year.

Our year-to-date interest expense is up $430,000 on a dollar basis, comparing very favorably to the $7.1 million if interest income has risen. Year to date, our rate on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.33% for the quarter, down 19 basis points from the prior year as the impact of Marblehead's lower-cost deposits and organic deposit growth in a number of our markets has held down funding costs. We believe that this quarter will likely represent the low point on funding costs as well as the peak in our net interest margin of 3.48%.

We do have several more quarters of asset repricing, and we will continue to roll off bond balances into higher-yielding assets, but funding costs will likely rise to offset that margin appreciation. As has been the case for most of the last two years, fee income has been fairly consistent at between $4 million and $5 million per quarter. With the level of our margin revenue increasing substantially, the fee income to total revenue percentage has trended down from our historical averages to the now mid to high 20 percentile range. This quarter, we had a higher OMSR impairment, the improvement in rates, which was more than offset by the increase in our equity from the lower AOCI debt level.

Total mortgage banking contribution this quarter of nearly $1.5 million was higher compared to 2024 by over 10%. We continue to utilize a hedging program, which allows us to not only maximize gain potential but also minimize our rate exposure. With an expanding pipeline, the gain on sale yield thus far in 2025 is 2.08%, slightly down from 2024. The sale percentage this quarter of nearly 100% has increased our year-to-date originated sale percentage now to 88%. Operating expenses, as Mark commented, continued to be well controlled as they were down from the linked quarter by 3% and up from the prior year by just $500,000 or 4.5%.

This sub-5% growth level includes all of the operating costs for Marblehead fully integrated into our current environment. We've increased total headcount by just five from the prior year as we have made structural changes in mortgage and support to offset the new additions for Marblehead and for our lending staff. Now let's review the balance sheet. Mark touched on our growth metrics for both loans and deposits, which have been critical to our earnings expansion this year.

Looking into 2026, we expect that we will deliver another high single-digit level of loan growth, which we intend to fund with bond portfolio runoff, 4% to 5% deposit growth, and supplemented by targeted wholesale borrowings that complement our current balance sheet structure. We have not been a large player in the wholesale market as our stable deposit franchise has been able to deliver the funding needs for us to self-fund our asset growth. We currently have just $35 million of wholesale borrowings with an average coupon in the low 4s. All of our liquidity ratios are currently well within policy.

We have immediate access to over $190 million in FHLB capacity with nearly $500 million in total contingent funding options. Our loan-to-deposit ratio remained consistent with the linked quarter at 88%. We believe that the low to mid-90s is a target level for this ratio that will balance profitability and liquidity risk. Given the stable nature of our deposit franchise with an average account balance of roughly $22,000, our deposit betas are very predictable and allow us to rely upon that funding base moving forward. On capital management, during the quarter, we repurchased 101,000 shares at an average price of just under $20, roughly 115% of tangible book and 95% of tangible book adjusted for AOCI.

We have now bought back nearly 252,000 shares this year for $4.5 million, using 45% of our earnings. As Mark mentioned, tangible book value per share was up in the linked quarter by $0.77, driven by a $2.1 million benefit on AOCI, higher earnings, and a reduction in share count from the buyback. And lastly, asset quality. Total delinquencies were slightly lower than the linked quarter at 45 basis points, with the bulk of the reduction in the ninety-plus day category. Since the prior year, total delinquent loans are down $1.7 million, and total classified loans were also well down from the prior year by nearly $1.3 million or 21%.

Our allowance for credit losses increased one basis point but remained consistent with portfolio trends and in line with recent quarterly loss rates. Given the general improvement in our CECL metrics and the improvement in NPLs this quarter, and what potentially will be upgraded in the near term, it is more than likely that this is the high end of our reserve level going forward. I will now turn the call back over to Mark.

Mark A. Klein: Thank you, Tony. We remain very encouraged by our potential to deliver a strong performance in the last quarter and full year for 2025. Anticipated further reductions by the Federal Reserve, potentially expanding mortgage volume coupled with a larger balance sheet and higher margin, should provide the tailwind we expect as we close out the final quarter. We continue to see strong loan pipelines, and the new lenders we have added to our team are anxious to deliver new loan and deposit relationships. We announced a dividend last week of $0.0155 per share, equating to a 3.1% yield and just 24% of our earnings. This will complete our thirteenth consecutive year of increasing our annual dividend payout to our shareholders.

Now we'll open the call up for any questions.

Operator: Jamie, we are now ready for questions.

Operator: To withdraw your questions, you may press 2. To ensure the best sound quality. Once again, in order to ask a question, please press star and 1. And our first question comes from Brian Joseph Martin from Janney Montgomery. Please go ahead with your question.

Brian Joseph Martin: Hey, good morning, guys.

Mark A. Klein: Hey, Brian. Good morning, Brian.

Brian Joseph Martin: Hey. Thanks for the update there. Just, I don't know, Mark, maybe just can you, whomever, I guess, just on the loan growth, can you just talk about it anyway? It sounds like, Mark, your last comments about maybe some recent hires. I don't know if they're recent or someone you're talking about over the last six to twelve months you've hired.

But just the pipeline and the hires, sounds like the ag will be a little bit of a focus here given the new addition there, but just how we think about the growth, the pipelines, and the growth the next, you know, six to twelve months and particularly, I guess, maybe just geographically, it sounds like there's good growth everywhere, but maybe a little bit more in ag here in the short term.

Mark A. Klein: Yes. As you know and as I indicated, we hired a new seasoned ag lender from a competitor that has gone through some M&A, and that individual managed over a $100 million portfolio. So we're clearly expecting some opportunities there, given the disruption in the landscape and the opportunities there. We've also replaced an individual in the Northern market with a seasoned individual that has been with some larger banks that clearly managed a larger portfolio as well. So those are a couple of areas that we are pretty optimistic about.

And then we've also certainly continued to have good traction from the Columbus, Ohio market under the leadership of Adam Gressel and the two lenders that we have in that market. And, as I mentioned, CRE continues to be the focus, but C&I still is on our radar in all of our markets. Steve Walz can give a little bit of color on growth in the other markets we have, Steve, which has been a little more limited.

Steven A. Walz: Sure. Yeah. Thanks, Mark. Yeah. Brian, I think, you know, you heard discussions in the comments about our expectations about Ag and what can be delivered there. We do certainly expect that addition to aid our, call them, legacy markets that have been certainly flatter growth. That being said, it doesn't change our expectation that Columbus will continue to deliver high levels of growth, but also those other growing more urban markets do expect to play along as well. So we certainly expect a little pickup in ag, we do have expectations broadly. That the additions we made will enter to our benefit, broadly.

Brian Joseph Martin: Gotcha. And can you, I guess, is there how is the pipeline of, you know, kind of unfunded commitments far as those funding up here? I guess, is there a still pretty healthy balance of what you guys expect to fund up there that's kind of already booked and just you know, kind of waiting to be funded?

Steven A. Walz: There remains a number of dollars in unfunded commitments. We continue to some of those dollars as they roll obviously into the permanent loan structure. We continue to grow in that area as well, and we expect certainly over the next six to twelve months and in this quarter as well, continue to kind of hold serve with where we've been on a growth rate, Brian.

Mark A. Klein: Tony, any additional color on the pipeline?

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yes. I think as Steve and Mark mentioned, we probably have $40 million of unused line commitments that we think will fund in the call it the next six to twelve months. I think most of our lending that's been commercial real estate, especially in the Columbus market, has probably been shorter term, kind of three-year type transaction. So we're probably one year into that process. So we feel like there's still significant potential there to expand that. I would think Q4 we're probably going to do a similar growth level that we did in Q3, call it, you know, $15 to $20 million of growth.

And our initial expectations are kind of an $80 million to $100 million 2026 number. And call that 40% funded by things that we've already booked and 60% from new activity. I guess, I'd lay it out at a high level.

Brian Joseph Martin: Gotcha. Okay. Yeah. And, Tony, I guess, maybe can you talk about the ability? I heard your comments on the margin, but just you know, I know you still have a fair amount of liquidity, but you also talked about growing deposits and potentially using some, you know, some borrowings. Just frame up, I mean, I guess, the loan growth here, you know, in the next six to twelve months in terms of how you fund that, I guess, is it primarily gonna come from the liquidity or I guess, is that not the case? Just trying to get your work that down a bit.

Feels like if you work that down a little bit, you know, it probably, you know, helps the margin a little bit. But I think, again, you also talked about the competitiveness. So, you know, just how you can frame up the margin outlook and just that utilization of that liquidity.

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yeah. I mean, you know, in a perfect world, you know, let's say we've got $50 million of, you know, $50 to $75 million of available liquidity today that we're investing overnight. If I didn't think there was gonna be a significant increase in the competitive nature of deposits, you know, I think we turn that $50 million to $75 million immediately into our loan pipeline, which we'll probably call that a 300 basis point improvement over what we're earning today. And I've just kind of believed on the ground from what I've seen that funding costs and competition are gonna get tougher. So I really think we've had a very stable deposit base that there's no but there.

I do think that there's going to be some pretty good competitive offerings from competition in the early part of 2026. And I think our customers will be subject to some of that desire and emphasis about potentially wanting higher rates, which concerns me a little bit that will squeeze our margin. But if I think we can hold where we are, and just use that $75 million, then I do think margins will increase from where they are today.

Mark A. Klein: Well, unfortunately, Tony, the runoff and the amortization in the securities portfolio certainly had some inertia and some backwind as well.

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yes.

Brian Joseph Martin: Okay. And so it's just big picture or broadly Tony, you know, given the competitive pickup here, I guess if your margin peaks this quarter, I guess, do you just see it kind of being just a little downward drift given, you know, the factors you've kind of outlined there. It doesn't seem like there's a big shift lower just doesn't seem like it's going a lot higher. It's more of the offset with, you know, some of the repricing that you're going to have and then you're just being offset by maybe the competitive factors a bit. Is that kind of how to think about it?

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yes. Because I do think, yeah, I do think, you know, three and a half is a good solid margin level for us given our asset size and given where we are. I think we're probably going to hold that margin level throughout 2026 because we're going to have repricing on the asset portfolio, bond roll-off that will be higher, you know, reuse of liquidity, that will be a higher number. And a little bit of headwind from funding costs potentially. But, you know, if we have fairly dramatic rate decreases in the short term, our prime-based, call it, every 25 basis points cost us, you know, call it $350,000 on an annualized basis.

You know, kind of our prime-based HELOCs, etcetera. We probably got 75 basis points of move before we hit our floors. So we're kind of in that window of, you know, how you recover from that if it's a fairly rapid decline in fed rates?

Brian Joseph Martin: Got you. Okay. That's helpful. And, just that's fine. I think that was it on that. And then how about just in terms of the credit quality, sounds as though there's opportunity. You know, this is kind of the peak on the reserve coverage. I guess, can you just kind of frame up? I mean, I guess, credit quality holds and there's no big and you do see a little improvement here, it sounds like there's some potential improvement. Maybe just frame up what that improvement could look like and just where you're thinking on reserve coverage, you know, over time as you kind of continue to, you know, bring that the credit numbers down, they a little bit more.

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yeah. I mean, I'm happy to start. I do think we probably have got, call it, you know, $500,000 to a million of current non-performing that we think we have a better than average chance that we're going to be able to either upgrade or get those paid off in the next, call it, six months. And then I think that will be, as we talked about, kind of that 25 basis point level of NPAs, which I think is probably the low point that we'll see. So I think that adds some downward pressure in the current world of CECL about where our reserve is.

If you look at any comparison we have relative to peer or relative to where we are, our reserve level at 144 is at the high end, which is fantastic. But I do think we're going to have some pressure that potentially we're not going to take reserve back, but we may not be putting as much in as we have this year. I mean, we put in almost $1 million this year through nine months. So a pretty strong level of provision we've set aside in what has been a great credit quality year.

Steven A. Walz: Brian. I'd just add, we've talked about it in prior quarters here. We've got a very robust loan review process and have been confident that we understand where our weaknesses are. So the pace of improving that ratio has been a function of the time it takes to get controlled collateral in some instances, just being a little longer than we expected. It's not really a result of, well, one troubled credit fell off and was replaced by another. Again, we remain confident. We know our portfolio well. It's really just been a pace at which we thought we could clean some of those up that has frustrated us.

Brian Joseph Martin: Yeah. No. Understood. And that reserve ratio, Tony, I mean, maybe it gets down to the one twenty-five, one thirty type of level. Is that where we over time, you could see it go as things progress? Or is that do you have kind of a target as far as where you're thinking that ends up, you know, down the road?

Mark A. Klein: Well, before Tony answers, I gotta tell you, Brian, you know, he and I are kind of bookends on that strategy. If we grow $150 or $200 million, I can see it going down to that, but I see it going down to that just because we have charge-offs or less reserve. This is not going to happen.

Anthony V. Cosentino: Think more is always better in that arena.

Mark A. Klein: Yeah. Totally agree.

Anthony V. Cosentino: I would say I worry less about the percentage than kind of the full dollar amount. I would get if we're here next time this time next year, we're probably in the range of, call it, $16 million on a reserve level from our $15.3 million that we're at today. And then where that reserve percentage is, if we grow $80 million to $100 million, it's probably at $139,000,140 million, something like that. So it's not terribly out. But our coverage of NPAs at that point, if we get to where we think we are, is probably over 400. So we feel pretty good about where it is.

Brian Joseph Martin: Yeah. Okay. That makes sense. I mean, you guys have done a great job on credit. And like you said, the reserves are, as Mark said, always bigger or stronger or better. Bigger is always better, but, you know, certainly have to understand the modeling as well and where the credit picture looks like. But okay. And then maybe just one of the last two here, just on the expense outlook. Can you talk about kind of where we're at today? I guess I know that could change a lot, with mortgage production and whatnot. There's some volatility with that.

But you guys have done a great job on the expense side and just kind of, you know, trying to get my arms around, you know, what that looks like, you know, in the coming quarters. Is just next twelve months? How do you wanna frame it up? Just kind of the trajectory from kind of the current expense run rate, how should we should think about it?

Mark A. Klein: Well, Brian, just a couple of comments, and Tony can certainly clean this up. But as well know, technology has become a big factor in the expense side. And we continue to work hard to remain relevant in that space, but that certainly is going to continue to accelerate on into the next, foreseeable future. And then, obviously, from a people perspective, we're seeing a lot of pressure, if you will, in various markets to identify and attract the talent that we need. So pressure is clearly on the expense side, which certainly adds fuel to the fire when we talk about balance sheet expansion and stabilized or widening margins.

But it's going to get a little more difficult as we move forward, which again, so critical to expand the balance sheet. And Tony, I know you probably have some additional ideas on that.

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yeah. I mean, you know, I think Q4, you know, we did $11.11 5 in total expense in Q3. I think Q4 will be in a similar number. I do think mortgage volume will be up, call it, 15% versus where it was in the linked quarter, probably somewhere around $80 million. So that will drive a little bit higher expense. But call it 11.5% in Q4, you know, which would give us, you know, call it 46 and some change, for all of 2025. You know, I mean, I hate to say I feel good about it where expenses are, but I do.

I mean, we've added some staff and some things, but we made some structural changes on support in mortgage. And we continue to find those kind of opportunities of people doing more jobs, kind of linking things together and doing some of those kinds of things. I do think our hybrid strategy on branches will allow us to retrofit some that will reduce some headcount. So I feel pretty good that a 3% or 4% pace in 2026 would be okay at this point.

Brian Joseph Martin: Gotcha. Okay. Yeah. It makes sense. The, like you say, the hybrid and some of the other, you know, like, done on the mortgage side has really helped, and, you know, we'll see what happens with the volume, which is kind of maybe the last thing I wanna ask Tony just to Mark I just in terms of, you know, Mark's comment about the, you know, the thirty-year being below six and really no refinancing done this year, I guess, how do you think about just the mortgage volume for next year?

I mean, I think if, you know, if you don't know what you know, we guess you could talk a little bit about the fourth quarter that's front and center, but just in terms of what you're thinking in terms of where rates are today and the people you have on the ground, what should be, you know, kind of big picture outlook.

Mark A. Klein: Well, as you know, Brian, we're geared up for and structured for that $450 million to $500 million number that we've talked about forever. We're still structured like that. We've improved marginally, but we're looking for a sub-six, much like everyone is looking for a sub-six and something with that 5.5% kind of a number or 5.25% would be a great boost to that level of volume. But this year certainly has been better than the one before. But we have the capacity and 23 different producers that are highly incented to find additional volume.

I would certainly like to think that we would get Tony's got his number, I'm sure, but I'd certainly like we'd get back into the 400 range as rates decline, particularly on the ten-year. Now I know it bumped back up here recently, but that would be a welcomed boost to our earnings, if you will, if we could get something in that 5% range. Comments, Tony?

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yes. I think, like I said, we'll likely do $80 million in the fourth quarter, which will be a nice solid improvement from the $68 million we did this quarter. I do think mortgage volume will tend higher. You know, we're now in, call it, the fourth year of this kind of tough rate environment, and there becomes a point where you do have a kind of a backlog of things. Looked at the pipeline this morning of $37 million, and there were an awful lot of refinances on there, probably, you know, call it $12 million of that. So, you know, about 30%, which would be a big number.

So you get this initial move when you get the rate below six. And then I think if you see that for an extended period, you might get back to a 20% refinance level. And if that's the case, then I think the $320 million to $350 million range is probably pretty solid. You have an outside chance to get to the kind of a four handle in 2026. We'll see how this quarter goes.

Mark A. Klein: Just short of my number, 400, don't have any optimistic CEO. A roundup.

Anthony V. Cosentino: To the four handle.

Mark A. Klein: Somewhere in there. Something north of four. How about that, Brian? Would be good to date.

Brian Joseph Martin: There you go. Well, I wanna ask for best out of rates because it'll drive a lot of it too. So, and I guess everything good with the Marblehead transaction in terms of the integration. I guess no, I guess, yeah. Mark, you talked a little bit about the opportunity. You know, anything you're seeing in that market that, you know, is something we should, you know, hear about in terms of any initiatives you've got there? I know it if there's opportunity there, but just trying to frame up the integration went well and those cost savings are all, I guess, effectively in the numbers now in terms of when we look at next quarter.

Mark A. Klein: Yes, they generally had a smaller staff, and, you know, we're getting back in the game up there. They were basically on the sidelines for at least a couple of years, you know, given their capital position. So we got some work to do. But clearly, there's opportunities up there, and we intend to pursue those. The staff that was there is still there. And we're leveraging that brand that's 117 plus years old into ours.

So we have high expectations that, coupled with wasn't your question, but you couple that with the new market we're going into in Henry County collectively has, as I mentioned, $800 million in deposits there that strangely enough, $700 million of that $800 million rested in community banks. That I would say below, you know, $3.02, $3 billion. Now it's like $300 million. So there's a lot of deposits that have gone to regional players, and our intent is to pursue those aggressively.

So everything to the North and a little to the East, I guess, of us, which would be the Henry County thing, is where our focus is gonna be in addition to that Columbus market that we all know is on fire.

Brian Joseph Martin: Yeah. Okay. And I guess in terms of, you know, capital, balancing, you know, potential, you know, M&A versus, you know, the continued repurchase of shares, you know, what's the mindset today, you know, in terms of how you're thinking about that, you know, how we should think about it, you know, in the coming quarters?

Anthony V. Cosentino: Yeah. I think, you know, I think we're getting to the point. Obviously, our, you know, our dividend shareholder dividend is going to be above $4 million next year based upon where we are. So that's getting to be meaningful. We obviously are fine on a regulatory capital basis, but I would say we're probably going to probably slow down the buyback a little bit. Just so we can retain a little bit of capital for potential transactions if they come together. Although we still have a tremendous amount of excess earnings. Obviously, our debt reprices next year, mid-year.

So we've got some things we got to think about there whether we, you know, refinance or, you know, expand or do some things there. So, I think on the capital front, we have a lot of opportunities and options as we sit today.

Brian Joseph Martin: Gotcha. Okay. Well, I appreciate, Ali. I'll take in all the questions and the update, guys.

Mark A. Klein: That's alright. Thanks, Brian.

Anthony V. Cosentino: Have a good one.

Operator: To withdraw your questions, you may press star and 2. And it's showing no questions at this time. We'll end today's question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any closing remarks.

Mark A. Klein: Once again, thank you for joining us this morning, and we certainly look forward to bringing you up to date on our full year results in January. Thank you for joining. Goodbye.

Operator: And with that, ladies and gentlemen, we'll conclude today's conference call and presentation. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.