HAUZ vs. VNQI: How Do These Two Real Estate ETFs Compare on Yield, Cost, and Performance?

Source The Motley Fool

Key Points

  • HAUZ charges a slightly lower expense ratio but manages less than one-fourth the assets under management of VNQI

  • HAUZ delivered a stronger 1-year total return, while both funds posted similar risk profiles and top holdings

  • Both ETFs focus heavily on real estate, but HAUZ leans even more into the sector with less cash exposure

  • 10 stocks we like better than Dbx ETF Trust - Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF ›

Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (NASDAQ:VNQI) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (NYSEMKT:HAUZ) both target international real estate, but HAUZ edges ahead with a marginally lower fee, higher recent return, and a more concentrated real estate sector tilt.

Both VNQI and HAUZ offer exposure to real estate stocks outside the United States, appealing to investors seeking diversification in global property markets. This comparison looks at cost, performance, risk, sector makeup, and portfolio quirks to help clarify which may better align with various investment goals.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricVNQIHAUZ
IssuerVanguardXtrackers
Expense ratio0.12%0.10%
1-yr return (as of Mar. 16, 2026)11.7%13.4%
Dividend yield4.6%4.4%
Beta0.710.75
AUM$4.2 billion$1.0 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

HAUZ comes in slightly more affordable on fees at 0.10% compared to VNQI’s 0.12%, which could appeal to cost-conscious investors. VNQI offers a modestly higher dividend yield at 4.6%, edging out HAUZ’s 4.4% payout.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricVNQIHAUZ
Max drawdown (5 y)-35.76%-34.53%
Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$817$850

What's inside

HAUZ targets the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, resulting in an ultra-focused real estate portfolio: 96% real estate, 412 holdings, and just 2% in industrials and 1% in communication services. Its largest weights go to Goodman Group (ASX:GMG), Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd (OTC:MITEY), and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd (OTC:MTSFY), with the fund in existence for 12.5 years and no notable quirks such as leverage or hedging.

VNQI, by contrast, spreads its bets across 682 holdings with 80% real estate exposure, but holds a higher allocation to cash and other assets (16%) and a minor tilt to financial services. Its top names overlap with HAUZ, featuring Mitsubishi Estate Co Ltd, Goodman Group, and Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd, but with slightly lower individual weights. Both funds offer broad, index-based international property exposure with subtle differences in sector concentration.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

For those investors who want to build or increase their exposure to the real estate sector, both Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) are exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to consider. Here’s how they measure up to one another.

Let’s start with VNQI, which is one of the world’s largest real estate ETFs. Like many real estate ETFs, if focuses on real estate investment trusts (REIT), however this fund has an international focus, which might be appealing to investors seeking to diversify their real estate exposure.

In the head-to-head matchup, VNQI boasts a slightly higher dividend yield (4.6% vs. 4.4%). It also has a significantly higher AUM ($4.2 billion vs. $1.0 billion). This higher AUM makes it easier for investors to buy and sell shares by keeping the bid/ask spread tight for ETF shares.

Turning to HAUZ, it has the edge in several key respects. HAUZ has a slightly lower expense ratio (0.10% vs. 0.12%). It also has a better one-year and five-year performance history.

In summary, cost-conscious investors may favor HAUZ, which has also demonstrated better short and long-term performance. Those investors focused strictly on income may select VNQI given its higher dividend yield, along with those who value greater liquidity.

Should you buy stock in Dbx ETF Trust - Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Dbx ETF Trust - Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Dbx ETF Trust - Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $508,877!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,115,328!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 936% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 189% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 18, 2026.

Jake Lerch has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Goodman Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Natural Gas sinks to pivotal level as China’s demand slumpsNatural Gas price (XNG/USD) edges lower and sinks to $2.56 on Monday, extending its losing streak for the fifth day in a row. The move comes on the back of China cutting its Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) imports after prices rose above $3.0 in June. It
Author  FXStreet
Jul 01, 2024
Natural Gas price (XNG/USD) edges lower and sinks to $2.56 on Monday, extending its losing streak for the fifth day in a row. The move comes on the back of China cutting its Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) imports after prices rose above $3.0 in June. It
placeholder
My Top 5 Stock Market Predictions for 2026Five 2026 market predictions written in a native, news-style voice: AI’s winners and losers, broader sector leadership, dividend demand, valuation cooling as the Shiller CAPE sits at 39 (Dec. 31, 2025), and quantum-computing bursts—while keeping all original facts and numbers unchanged.
Author  Mitrade
Jan 06, Tue
Five 2026 market predictions written in a native, news-style voice: AI’s winners and losers, broader sector leadership, dividend demand, valuation cooling as the Shiller CAPE sits at 39 (Dec. 31, 2025), and quantum-computing bursts—while keeping all original facts and numbers unchanged.
placeholder
Bitcoin Price Forecast: BTC extends gains after third consecutive week of ETF inflowsBitcoin (BTC) extends gains, trading above $73,000 at the time of writing on Monday, following a bullish breakout from the consolidation pattern it had been trading since roughly the past six weeks.
Author  FXStreet
Mar 16, Mon
Bitcoin (BTC) extends gains, trading above $73,000 at the time of writing on Monday, following a bullish breakout from the consolidation pattern it had been trading since roughly the past six weeks.
placeholder
Gold rises on Middle East tensions; inflation fears temper rate cut bets and cap gainsGold (XAU/USD) edges higher during the Asian session on Tuesday, though it lacks follow-through and remains close to an over three-week low, touched the previous day.
Author  FXStreet
Yesterday 05: 50
Gold (XAU/USD) edges higher during the Asian session on Tuesday, though it lacks follow-through and remains close to an over three-week low, touched the previous day.
placeholder
Silver Price Forecast: XAG/USD consolidates above $79.00; bearish bias intact ahead of FedSilver (XAG/USD) lacks a firm intraday direction and oscillates in a narrow range during the Asian session on Wednesday as traders opt to wait on the sidelines ahead of the crucial FOMC rate decision.
Author  FXStreet
13 hours ago
Silver (XAG/USD) lacks a firm intraday direction and oscillates in a narrow range during the Asian session on Wednesday as traders opt to wait on the sidelines ahead of the crucial FOMC rate decision.
goTop
quote