Alpha Metallurgical (AMR) Earnings Transcript

Source Motley_fool
Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Date

Aug. 8, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. ET

Call participants

Chief Executive Officer — Andy Eidson

Chief Financial Officer — Todd Munsey

Chief Operating Officer — Jason Whitehead

Chief Commercial Officer — Dan Horn

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

Risks

Management explicitly stated, "Met coal indexes have stayed depressed in recent weeks, and in the case of U.S. East Coast High Vol A and High Vol B, both pricing mechanisms reached multiyear lows that were last seen in 2021."

Quarterly commentary noted, "Metallurgical coal markets continue to be challenged with lingering concerns about weak steel demand and lackluster global economic growth expectations."

Management said of market volatility, "significant uncertainty remains about the broader implications of the trade war and how it will influence global growth prospects."

Takeaways

Adjusted EBITDA-- Adjusted EBITDA was $46.1 million in Q2 2025, up sharply from $5.7 million in the prior quarter.

Coal sales volume-- 3.9 million tons shipped in Q2 2025, up from 3.8 million tons in the prior quarter.

Met segment weighted average realization-- $122.84 per ton, up from $122.08 in the prior quarter.

Export met realizations-- $113.82 per ton for Atlantic/other mechanisms and $109.75 per ton for Australian indices, compared to $119.39 and $107.44, respectively, in the prior quarter.

Cost of coal sales (met segment)-- $100.06 per ton, improving from $110.34 per ton in the prior quarter, reflecting the best company performance since 2021.

SG&A expense (excluding non-cash and non-recurring)-- $11.9 million, down from $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2025.

Capital expenditures-- $34.6 million in capital expenditures, down from $38.5 million in the prior quarter.

Total liquidity-- $556.9 million in total liquidity at quarter-end, a nearly 15% increase from the previous quarter, driven by higher ABL facility availability.

Cash provided by operating activities-- Cash provided by operating activities was $53.2 million, more than doubling from $22.2 million in the prior quarter.

Guidance adjustments-- Full-year 2025 cost of coal sales guidance lowered to $101-$107 per ton. SG&A expense guidance range reduced to $48-$54 million for 2025; idle operations expense guidance increased to $21-$29 million for 2025; net cash interest income guidance raised to $6-$12 million for 2025.

2025 met tonnage commitments-- 69% of metallurgical tons committed and priced at an average $127.37 per ton for 2025; remaining 31% of metallurgical tonnage for 2025 committed but not yet priced.

Board buyback program-- Buyback program formally restarted after approximately five quarters of inactivity, to be executed on an opportunistic basis.

Kingston Wildcat mine status-- Slope development 93% complete, infrastructure progressing as planned, and first production targeted for late 2025.

Potential advanced manufacturing production credit impact-- Newly passed law designates met coal as a critical mineral; preliminary analysis estimates a cash benefit of $30 million to $50 million annually between 2026 and 2029.

Met coal market indices at quarter-end-- U.S. East Coast High Vol B: $149/ton, down 5.1% sequentially. Australian Premium Low Vol: $173.50/ton. U.S. East Coast Low Vol: $175/ton as of Aug. 7, 2025; U.S. East Coast High Vol A: $161/ton.

Summary

Alpha Metallurgical Resources(NYSE:AMR) delivered substantial quarter-over-quarter improvements in cost performance, liquidity, and operating cash flow in Q2 2025, along with incremental volume and pricing gains across its metallurgical coal business segments. The company took proactive measures to strengthen its financial standing through lower operating costs, updated guidance reductions, and the reinstatement of its share buyback program. Strategic clarity was reinforced by detailed visibility on 2025 tonnage commitments and a transparent update on the Kingston Wildcat mine’s timeline toward late-year production and future customer engagement. Management also highlighted the financial implications of new U.S. federal legislation granting met coal critical mineral designation and advanced production tax credits, with an estimated benefit of $30 million to $50 million per year beginning in 2026.

CEO Eidson reported, we ended the quarter with $557 million in total liquidity, nearly 15% higher than at the end of the prior quarter, with the majority of that growth coming from an increase in our ABL facility.

Todd Munsey stated, "We are lowering our cost of coal sales guidance for the year to a range of $101 per ton to $107 per ton, down from the prior range of $103 to $110 per ton."

Management clarified that the thermal byproduct tonnage is fully committed and priced at an average of $80.52 per ton at the midpoint of 2025 guidance.

COO Whitehead indicated, A 10% increase in tons per man-hour over the prior quarter contributed to lower labor and other fixed costs.

Industry glossary

ABL facility: Asset-based lending facility, a type of revolving credit secured by company assets.

Met coal: Metallurgical coal, a grade of coal used in steelmaking processes.

Atlantic and other pricing mechanisms: Contract price formulas for met coal exports tied to Atlantic basin (Europe/US) or other regional indices.

Section 45X: U.S. federal tax code provision granting production credits for advanced manufacturing, now including met coal as a critical mineral.

High Vol A/B and Low Vol: Subcategories of metallurgical coal defined by volatile matter content, important for pricing and utilization in steelmaking.

API2 index: Benchmarks seaborne thermal coal prices delivered into northwest Europe.

DTA: Dominion Terminal Associates, a major coal export facility in Hampton Roads, Virginia.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Andy Eidson: Thanks, Emily, good morning, everyone. Today, we announced our second quarter financial results, which include adjusted EBITDA of $46.1 million and 3.9 million tons shipped in the quarter. Despite the difficult market backdrop, the team executed at a world-class level, particularly from an operating cost perspective. We achieved significant quarter-over-quarter improvement in the cost of coal sales, bringing our costs down by more than $10 per ton compared to the first quarter. This represents the best cost performance for the company since 2021. As a result, we have lowered cost guidance for the year along with additional adjustments for our 2025 expectations for SG&A, net cash interest income, and all operations expenses that Todd will cover in more detail.

As we have demonstrated in prior years, we remain committed to fine-tuning guidance as we gain a better understanding of how the year is shaping up. The adjustments we are communicating today reflect our latest thinking about the back half of 2025 and our projected performance in the coming months. Metallurgical coal markets continue to be challenged with lingering concerns about weak steel demand and lackluster global economic growth expectations. Despite seemingly positive public statements in recent weeks from China committing to address their industrial overcapacity, and despite announcements about trade deals between the United States and some countries, broader uncertainty remains around the global economy and what impact higher tariffs may have.

Met coal indexes have stayed depressed in recent weeks, and in the case of U.S. East Coast High Vol A and High Vol B, both pricing mechanisms reached multiyear lows that were last seen in 2021. With that said, we also see continuing supply disruptions across almost all producer regions for various reasons. Combined with the potential impact of Chinese involution measures, the market could be heading toward a better supply-demand balance. This is a dynamic situation that we will continue to monitor closely. Especially in a cyclical business like ours with significant volatility, it's impossible to mark the top or bottom of the cycle when it's happening.

The catalysts that cause our market to shift in meaningful ways often reveal themselves in hindsight rather than real-time. One way we have responded to this uncertainty is to strengthen our balance sheet and our liquidity position. That simultaneously has positioned us for future opportunities when steel demand and market conditions improve. I'm pleased to report that we ended the second quarter with $557 million in total liquidity, nearly 15% higher than the end of the first quarter, with the majority of that growth coming from an increase in our ABL facility. This morning, we announced the Board's decision to restart the buyback program on an opportunistic basis.

While the program has been inactive for roughly the last five quarters, our commitment to shareholder return has not changed. We remain dedicated to cautiously observing the market shifts, and the timing and amount of share repurchases will depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, market conditions, stock price, and applicable legal requirements and covenants. With that, I will turn the call over to Todd for additional information on our second quarter financial results.

Todd Munsey: Thanks, Andy. Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was $46.1 million, up from $5.7 million in the first quarter. We sold 3.9 million tons in Q2, up from 3.8 million tons sold in Q1. Met segment realizations increased quarter-over-quarter with an average realization of $119.43 in the second quarter, up from $118.61 in Q1. Export met tons priced against Atlantic and other pricing mechanisms in the second quarter realized $113.82 per ton, while export coal priced on Australian indices realized $109.75. These results are compared to realizations of $119.39 per ton and $107.44 respectively in the first quarter.

The realization for our metallurgical sales in Q2 was a total weighted average of $122.84 per ton, up from $122.08 per ton in Q1. Realizations in the incidental thermal portion of the met segment decreased to $78.10 per ton in Q2 as compared to $79.39 per ton in the first quarter. Cost of coal sales for our met segment decreased to $100.06 per ton in the second quarter, down from $110.34 per ton in Q1. Increased productivity, lower labor costs, and reduced repair and maintenance expenditures were the primary drivers of the decrease in costs. SG&A, excluding non-cash stock compensation and non-recurring items, decreased to $11.9 million in the second quarter as compared to $12.6 million in the first quarter.

CapEx for the quarter was $34.6 million, down from $38.5 million in Q1. Moving to the balance sheet and cash flows, as of June 30, 2025, we had $449 million in unrestricted cash, compared to $448 million of unrestricted cash as of March 31. We had $182.9 million in unused availability under our ABL at the end of the second quarter, partially offset by a minimum required liquidity of $75 million. As of June, Alpha had total liquidity of $556.9 million, up from $485.8 million at the end of March. Cash provided by operating activities was $53.2 million in Q2, up from $22.2 million in the first quarter.

As of June 30, our ABL facility had no borrowings and $42.1 million of letters of credit outstanding. We are lowering our cost of coal sales guidance for the year to a range of $101 per ton to $107 per ton, down from the prior range of $103 to $110 per ton. The company is also reducing its 2025 guidance for selling, general, and administrative expenses to a range of $48 million to $54 million, down from the previous range of $53 million to $59 million. We are increasing idle operations expense guidance for the year, moving to a range of $21 million to $29 million, up from the prior range of $18 million to $28 million.

Lastly, we expect increased net cash interest income for the year and are moving the guidance to between $6 million and $12 million, up from the previously established range of $2 million to $10 million. In terms of our committed position for 2025, at the midpoint of guidance, 69% of our metallurgical tonnage in the met segment is committed and priced at an average price of $127.37. Another 31% of our met tonnage for the year is committed but not yet priced. The thermal byproduct portion of the met segment is fully committed and priced at the midpoint of guidance at an average price of $80.52.

Lastly, we have closely followed federal legislation related to metallurgical coal's designation as a critical mineral. Of note is the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which amends Section 45X of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 45X is commonly referred to as the Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit and allows certain manufacturers to claim a tax credit for a percentage of their production costs.

Andy Eidson: With President Trump's signing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, metallurgical coal has been added to the list of applicable critical minerals. Met coal produced between 2026 and 2029 will be eligible for the refundable tax credit. We are still analyzing the financial impact of this credit on Alpha. Based on preliminary analysis, we estimate that the cash benefit of the tax credit may be in the range of $30 million to $50 million annually, depending upon the amount of qualifying production costs incurred in a given year. I will now turn the call over to Jason to provide an update on operations.

Jason Whitehead: Thanks, Todd, and good morning, everyone. As I mentioned in our last earnings call, after the challenging winter months in January and February, we saw evidence of our cost production efforts beginning in March and continuing into April. I'm pleased to report that we were able to build on that positive momentum within the second quarter. I want to commend the operations teams for once again showing why they are the very best at what they do. Cost reduction efforts carried out in Q2 were twofold. A 10% increase over Q1 in tons per man-hour contributed to lower labor and other fixed costs, and the teams achieved these efficiency gains while reducing supply and maintenance expenses.

So hats off to everyone for their continued relentless efforts in reducing spend and laser focus on safe production. At $100.06 per ton, the second quarter cost of coal sales represents our best quarterly performance since 2021. Given the challenging met coal pricing environment, we are also incurring lower sales-related costs. There's been a lot of good work throughout the organization to analyze our spending at the mine level and look for ways to safely reduce or eliminate unnecessary costs. This work continues and remains important, especially as some of our suppliers are passing along increased costs because of tariff impacts on their respective businesses.

While we are proud of achieving our best cost performance in years, there is still more work to be done, and I look forward to our continued progress in these areas. Looking ahead, our Kingston team continues to develop work on the Kingston Wildcat, our new low vol mine. The slope development is now approaching 1,625 feet, approximately 93% of the way from the surface to the coal horizon. The mine is approaching the final stages before development production begins, with significant progress occurring on the supporting infrastructure around the mine. We are still on track with our previously communicated schedule, with expectations of first coal production and the ability to ship coal late this year.

As we approach the slope bottom, our sales teams have had opportunities to take potential customers on-site tours. We are seeing a lot of excitement building around this premium product as it comes close to hitting the market. With those operational updates, I will now turn the call over to Dan for some details on the market.

Dan Horn: Thanks, Jason, and good morning, everyone. Metallurgical coal markets, heavily influenced by depressed steel demand, continue to experience lackluster pricing and, in some cases, further deterioration over the course of 2025. The quarter brought continued economic uncertainty due to policy changes, geopolitical unrest, ongoing trade negotiations, and shifting trade policies across the globe. Further information from the United States about exemptions to its proposed tariffs and trade agreements negotiated between certain countries and the American administration have provided some insight into the isolated impacts of the change in trade strategy. However, significant uncertainty remains about the broader implications of the trade war and how it will influence global growth prospects.

Many economists cite trade uncertainty in their projections of slowing growth for the remainder of 2025, potentially higher inflation levels as a result. As global economic conditions continue to be shaped by changes in trade, monetary, and fiscal policies, the metallurgical coal market will also be influenced by these factors. Of the four indices that Alpha closely monitors, the U.S. East Coast High Vol B Index represents the largest move within the quarter, a reduction of 5.1%. The Australian Premium Low Vol Index increased from $169 per metric ton on April 1, 2025, to $173.50 per metric ton on June 30. The U.S.

East Coast Low Vol Index rose from $174 per metric ton in April to $175 per metric ton in June. The U.S. East Coast High Vol A Index fell from $168 per metric ton at the beginning of the quarter to $161 per metric ton at quarter close. The U.S. East Coast High Vol B Index decreased from $157 per metric ton to $149 per metric ton at quarter end. Since the quarter close, the Australian Premium Low Vol Index has seen modest improvement, while the three U.S. East Coast indices have remained roughly flat or fluctuated slightly lower.

Andy Eidson: As of August 7, the Australian Premium Low Vol Index increased from quarter close levels to $183.20 per metric ton. U.S. East Coast Low Vol, High Vol A, and High Vol B indices measured $175, $157, and $147.50 per ton, respectively, as of the same date. In the seaborne thermal market, the API2 index was $106 per metric ton as of April 1 and increased to $107.75 per metric ton on June 30. Since then, the API2 index has dropped to $103.75 per ton as of August 7. With regard to logistics, the team at DTA completed the previously discussed Q2 outages in connection with the multiyear infrastructure enhancement project.

We are pleased to report that the planned work during these periods occurred on time and with minimal disruption at the facility. While the coal markets remain challenging, we maintain our focus on providing excellent service as we fulfill contracts with our long-term customers. As is customary at this time of year, we are currently engaged in discussions with North American customers about contracting these tons for 2026. Those conversations are ongoing, and we will announce the result of these negotiations at the appropriate time. Operator, we are now ready to open the call for questions.

Operator: Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question and answer session. Our first question comes from Nick Giles with B. Riley Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Nick Giles: Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. Guys, your cost improvements quarter on quarter were astounding. So I want to commend you on that. Can you walk us through where the savings came from? I mean, how much was attributable to lower labor costs? How much to repair and maintenance? And how much on other operating efficiencies? And my second question is really, can you speak to the sustainability of these costs? Thank you very much.

Andy Eidson: Hey Nick. Thanks for the comment. I appreciate that. As far as the piece parts of the cost breakdown, I'll probably look to Jason or Todd to comment on that. I think the bigger move, and if you look at it relative to Q1, which was, you know, on the trend we've been, it was atypically high just because of, you know, some weather issues and other things we discussed in the Q1 earnings call. Some of this has been mean reversion, particularly on the surface months.

But just across the board, the higher productivity, getting more tons out, increasing the denominator, that was a force multiplier on the initiatives that we've been taking on internally, particularly the operations team, to take down the absolute dollars of expense we've been seeing in supplies and maintenance. So it's kind of a twofold attack. Comments on the sustainability, I don't want to get too early into Q3, but we're doing pretty well. I do think that the changes we've made are kind of fundamental to what we do. And we're certainly hopeful that we can maintain this run rate. But again, I'll turn it over to Jason and Todd for more detailed comments.

Jason Whitehead: Good morning, Nick. This is Jason. I don't really have a lot to add. Andy said it. You know, I would say roughly it's the savings was fifty-fifty on productivity and then actual spend. But the productivity being up around 10% quarter over quarter really helps a lot. And as Andy mentioned, the first quarter was rough, but a lot of weather-related delays and absenteeism and things like that.

Nick Giles: Guys, it's really helpful. Maybe just a follow-up. As we start to think about 2026, you used the word fundamental. How much further improvement could we see? I know some of that will come from the 45X tax credit. But is it fair to assume that we could see 2026 costs dip below the $100 mark?

Andy Eidson: Well, Nick, you've put me on the spot here because I typically don't like to talk about '26 before we have a budget in front of us. I really don't want to comment there. I mean, I'm always hopeful, and Jason always drives the ops team to find every nickel and dime they can. So, look, we missed sub-100 by $0.07. So is it possible? Certainly, it's possible, and we're going to do everything that we possibly can to continue pulling down. I think we've already found all the lowest hanging fruit. It gets more difficult, and obviously, the curve gets steeper as you dig deeper in. But Jason always refers to the land of opportunity.

Every time you think you've found everything there is, you stumble upon something else. So hopeful we can continue to make improvements. We'll just have to wait and see to the degree that we can achieve those gains.

Nick Giles: Andy, I appreciate that. And don't want to get too ahead of myself there either. So I do appreciate that. But my next question is really turning to how you're approaching domestic contracting. I mean, even if you priced in line with others on a 2025 basis, I think that could imply a downward move of over 10%. So how are you holding the line here, especially as makers might be looking for pricing to be more market-based in nature?

Dan Horn: We're going into this like we do probably every year at this time. We go in with our view of the market and remind the buyers, and I'll remind you, that we're selling a twelve-month term piece of business. We're not selling a spot ton today. There's a world of difference between the two. And so our view is, you know, we need to sustain our business in 2026. Yeah. We need pricing that works for us over twelve months. You know, of course, there's an eye on what the today price is. You can't ignore that.

But we're going in without giving you numbers, saying that we need pricing that sustains us next year regardless of what the seaborne market does.

Nick Giles: And I appreciate that. Maybe one more for you. I mean, in 2Q, there was almost a swap sequentially in volume terms of tons that were priced using other pricing mechanisms versus ones that were priced using Australian indices. Any color you can add on that? You know, really nice to see that realizations were able to tick up quarter on quarter. I know that can't be said for everyone.

Dan Horn: I would just say that in any given quarter, you might, we might, it's not unusual for us to have heavier shipments to Asia, for example, or maybe next quarter more to Europe. It can happen. It's up to the buyer's schedule. We certainly don't plan that. It's up to the buyers bringing in their vessels. So it was, you know, in the course of a whole year, you know, the tons are the tons, but in a quarter-to-quarter, you can see some variability. We don't control that.

Nick Giles: Fair enough. Guys, well, again, a really nice job. Keep up the good work.

Andy Eidson: Thank you.

Operator: Our next question comes from Nathan Martin with The Benchmark Company. Please proceed with your question.

Nathan Martin: Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone. Just to echo Nick's comments, congrats on the strong cost quarter. Sticking with that just for a second, guys, the updated cash cost guidance for the full year, what met price are you assuming in the back half of the year?

Andy Eidson: Yes. I think we're just kind of holding flat with where we are. I mean, we've already got the domestic piece, the fixed price portion has been there all year long. I think we're just kind of holding us where we are. If you look across from January to now, there's not been a whole lot of variation. So it's a pretty tight band, and that's usually how we do it.

Nathan Martin: Okay. Andy, got it. And I guess maybe taking a step back, macro type question. You know, Alpha sells a large portion of its exports to India and Brazil. So it would be great to get your thoughts around some of the recent escalation in trade tensions and tariffs there and how you think that could impact your business if you had any conversations with customers?

Dan Horn: Yes, this is Dan. At this point, we haven't had any pushback or negative feedback along those lines. In fact, we continue to get solicitations from the two countries you mentioned. Business as usual. So to date, we've had no negative feedback at all.

Nathan Martin: Okay, Dan. Appreciate that. Let me, everyone's focused, I think, on the persistently weak export markets for the most part, but, you know, Alpha is one of the, I mean, I guess, the largest seller of met coal to domestic markets. Where, again, pricing is more favorable this year at least to export. You know, I was hoping you could share with us first how many domestic tons you guys now have contracted for 2025? And then have you been able to pick up any business given the hardships some of your peers have had in this market, you know, as we've had idlings, bankruptcies, etcetera?

Dan Horn: Well, you know, in this year, we're, I think the number is somewhere around 3.5 million tons plus or minus that we'll ship. We really haven't picked up. There's not been much spot activity this year. Some years there is. I would say, not so much. And the customers will largely dictate how much we get. Obviously, price negotiations are highly important, but so are their loyalties to certain brands, to certain coals for technical reasons. You don't see as much substitution and in and out that you do on the seaborne market. It's a little more steady state most from year to year. If that's helpful.

Nathan Martin: Yeah. No. That makes perfect sense, Dan. I appreciate that. And then maybe while I have you, just, you know, coming back to DTA, I appreciate your prepared remarks. Can you just remind us, are you guys still expecting to spend, I think, roughly around $25 million a year or so on that project? And then, you know, again, when are you hoping that gets completed?

Andy Eidson: Yeah. Yeah. This is Andy, Nate. That's about the same cadence. I don't think that's changed any, I think. Repairs and enhancements should be finished by, what, 2028. Correct, ZIP code?

Nathan Martin: Okay. Great. And then just one final one while I have you too. I mean, just given Alpha's a customer of both Eastern rails, just wondering if you could share your thoughts on the recently announced Union Pacific Norfolk Southern merger and how you think that potential combination could impact your business?

Andy Eidson: Yeah. That's a tough one to figure, and, obviously, I would defer to Dan on any specific comments. But I mean, our relationship with Norfolk Southern has always been extremely strong. They've done a nice job for us, and we're very comfortable with them. So it's a little bit of the we don't know what we don't know in relation to UP. So we'll just have to wait and see on that as well, but we've had really good service with Norfolk Southern, and so it's hard to imagine it can get materially better.

Dan Horn: Yes, I'll just add, Alpha's footprint, we don't have any operations west of the Mississippi, nor do we ship any met coal in that out west. Our network is essentially mining coal in Central App and taking it to the ports of Hampton Roads. And we hope that there would be minimal impact because of that.

Nathan Martin: Alright. I'll leave it there. Appreciate the time, gentlemen, and good luck in the second half.

Andy Eidson: Thank you, Nate.

Operator: We have reached the end of the question and answer session. I will now turn the call over to Andy Eidson for closing remarks.

Andy Eidson: Thanks again to everyone who dialed in to be with us this morning. We appreciate your interest and your support of Alpha. We hope you all have a great weekend.

Operator: This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. And we thank you for your participation.

Where to invest $1,000 right now

When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor’s total average return is 1,047%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500.

They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.

See the stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Bitcoin Moving With Stocks, But Ethereum’s Correlation Is FadingBitcoin has been showing notable correlation to the stock equities recently, but data shows Ethereum is charting a more independent path. Bitcoin & Ethereum Showing Different Degrees Of
Author  NewsBTC
7 Month 10 Day Thu
Bitcoin has been showing notable correlation to the stock equities recently, but data shows Ethereum is charting a more independent path. Bitcoin & Ethereum Showing Different Degrees Of
placeholder
Ripple’s $21 Trillion Dream: What Capturing 20% Of SWIFT Volume Means For XRPRipple Labs, a crypto payments company, continues to set its ambitions and those of XRP higher than ever as it edges closer to disrupting the global financial messaging giant SWIFT. After Ripple CEO
Author  NewsBTC
7 Month 14 Day Mon
Ripple Labs, a crypto payments company, continues to set its ambitions and those of XRP higher than ever as it edges closer to disrupting the global financial messaging giant SWIFT. After Ripple CEO
placeholder
Philippines' GDP Growth Rises to 5.5% in Second Quarter of 2025The Philippine economy expanded at a marginally faster pace in the second quarter of 2025, with GDP growing 5.5% year-on-year.
Author  Mitrade
8 Month 07 Day Thu
The Philippine economy expanded at a marginally faster pace in the second quarter of 2025, with GDP growing 5.5% year-on-year.
placeholder
Asia Stocks Cautious Before China Tariff Deadline; Australia Sets Record HighMost Asian stock markets were little changed on Monday as investors looked ahead to the looming expiration of the U.S.-China tariff truce, while Australian equities climbed to new highs on rate-cut expectations.
Author  FXStreet
3 hours ago
Most Asian stock markets were little changed on Monday as investors looked ahead to the looming expiration of the U.S.-China tariff truce, while Australian equities climbed to new highs on rate-cut expectations.
placeholder
Oil Prices Extend Losses as Traders Eye US-Russia Summit, Inflation DataOil prices declined in Asian trading on Monday, adding to sharp losses from last week as expectations of progress in U.S.-Russia talks dampened geopolitical risk premiums, while weak inflation data from China weighed on demand sentiment.
Author  FXStreet
3 hours ago
Oil prices declined in Asian trading on Monday, adding to sharp losses from last week as expectations of progress in U.S.-Russia talks dampened geopolitical risk premiums, while weak inflation data from China weighed on demand sentiment.
goTop
quote