President Trump has warned of an "economic disaster" similar to the Great Depression if the Supreme Court rules against tariffs imposed under IEEPA.
Since Trump's baseline tariff took effect in April, hiring has slowed, unemployment has increased, inflation has accelerated, and consumer sentiment has fallen toward a record low.
If the Supreme Court rejects the IEEPA tariffs, the unanticipated government borrowing required to repay the taxes could cause the stock market to drop.
The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), the best barometer for the entire U.S. stock market, has advanced 17% in 2025 despite economic uncertainty created by President Trump's tariffs. Duties imposed to date have raised the average tax rate on U.S. imports to 16.8%, up from 2.5% last year, according to the Budget Lab at Yale.
The average tariff rate has not been so high in 90 years, and it has never increased so quickly. Trump justified most duties with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law that never explicitly affords the president the power to levy tariffs. In fact, the law never mentions the word "tariffs."
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
Consequently, the Court of International Trade determined the IEEPA tariffs were illegal in May, and the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the decision in August. The Supreme Court heard arguments in November, and most of the nine justices reportedly expressed doubts about legality. A final decision is likely in the coming weeks.
President Trump has warned of an "economic disaster" if the Supreme Court rejects his authority to impose tariffs under IEEPA. He wrote on social media, "It would be 1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION!" Does that mean the stock market could crash? Here's what investors should know.
Image source: Official White House Photo.
The U.S. Constitution affords Congress (not the president) the power to impose and collect taxes. So, the Trump administration has attempted to split hairs. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently said, "I don't believe tariffs are a tax." Most economists disagree. So do the New Oxford English Dictionary and the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, both of which define tariffs as taxes or duties on imported goods.
Treasury Secretary Bessent also argued the tariffs were "good for labor," echoing President Trump's assertion that his trade policies will bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S., thereby strengthening national security. But recent economic data suggests his tariffs have had the opposite effect.
Additionally, Bessent recently said the Supreme Court rejecting President Trump's tariffs would be a "loss for the American people." But that comment is at odds with recent data. The University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment has averaged 57.6 in 2025, the lowest annual average in history.
To summarize, since Trump began imposing tariffs earlier this year, hiring has slowed, unemployment has increased, manufacturing activity has declined, and consumer sentiment has plunged. Meanwhile, inflation has worsened in every month since the baseline tariff took effect in April.
Those trends would likely reverse if the Supreme Court rules against the tariffs. Of course, any improvement in the economic climate would be good news for stocks, especially an uptick in consumer sentiment. Consumer spending accounts for about two-thirds of GDP, making it the primary engine of economic growth. However, the S&P 500 could still decline if the Supreme Court rejects Trump's tariffs, but not because it would cause a depression.
The case before the Supreme Court only challenges President Trump's authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Revenue collected under that statute totaled about $90 billion in fiscal 2025 (which ended in September), according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
If the Supreme Court determines the president exceeded his authority, revenue collected under IEEPA tariffs would likely have to be repaid. Indeed, a growing list of U.S. companies (including Costco Wholesale) have filed lawsuits or submitted claims to ensure they are reimbursed, according to The New York Times.
That could be a problem for the stock market. The government didn't plan for that expense, so it would borrow money by issuing Treasury bonds. But bond investors concerned by growing federal debt -- a problem tariffs were supposed to alleviate -- would want higher interest rates to offset the risk. And higher yields typically hurt the stock market by making Treasuries more attractive.
In that scenario, the S&P 500 could decline (perhaps sharply) if the Supreme Court rules against the Trump administration. However, no matter what happens in the coming weeks, investors should focus on long-term returns. The S&P 500 returned 10.4% annually over the last three decades and similar results are likely over long periods in the future.
Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $540,587!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,118,210!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 991% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 195% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of December 1, 2025
Trevor Jennewine has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Costco Wholesale. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.